Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Developments Transmission Workgroup 3rd November 2011.
Advertisements

Framework Guideline on gas capacity allocation Stefanie Neveling, Co-Chair CAM TF 20 th Madrid Forum, 27 September 2011.
EU Implementation Programme Action TR1003: All to consider how to address EU developments going forward and send any identified issues to:
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
European Developments: Capacity Transmission Workgroup 6th October 2011.
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Transmission Workstream 7 th August 2008.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May : EU Capacity Regulations – Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
Proposer: insert Panel Date: insert 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title Guidance: These slides are meant to provide a brief overview for the UNC Panel, to introduce.
EU Gas Balancing Code – Nomination Update [Revised to reflect action TX1002] Action TX1002: EU Balancing Code/Nominations: Provide an overview of what.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February : Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.
Proposer: Hayley Burden Panel Date: 17th April : Mod Title: Imbalance Charge amendments required to align the UNC with the Network Code on Gas.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May 0501: Treatment of Existing Entry Capacity Rights at the Bacton ASEP to comply with EU Capacity Regulations.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
European Developments Transmission Workgroup 3 rd May 2012.
GC0104 – Demand Connection Code (DCC)
Transmission Workstream 6 January 2011
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 20/10/16
Capacity Conversion – 616s
Review of Demand Estimation Times for Modification Proposal 461
EU Implementation Programme
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
Transmission Planning Code – Draft Document
Background and Process
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Grid Code Review Panel 16th August 2017
Transmission Planning Code
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Transmission Workgroup – 1st December 2011
Proposer: BP Gas Marketing Ltd Panel Date: 17 April 2014
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
Review of System Alerts
Review of industry code governance
Annual Review - Methodology Statements
UNC Modification Proposal “Allocation of Daily NTS Entry Capacity Within-Day” Richard Fairholme.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
UNC 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Update on Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
Proposer: Penny Garner Panel Date: 19 April 2018
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Transmission Workgroup 6th March 2014
Transmission Planning Code Review
Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 7 February 2014
Modification 501 slides for Workgroup
UNC Modification Proposal 0385 Inclusion of DNOs as Users in User Pays Arrangements Phil Lucas 7 June 2011.
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
EU Developments.
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd
Optimisation of Entry Capacity Modification Proposal
Open Letter - Summary of Responses
Review: Entry Capacity Transfer and Trade Methodology Statement
Gemini Code Contingency Review
Transmission Workstream, 1 Mar 07
Modification 0621 / GB Charging Project DSC Change Management Committee update June 2018.
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
Capacity Access Review
Proposer: Tracey Saunders, Northern Gas Networks
Presentation transcript:

Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16 0597: Rules for the release of Incremental Capacity at Interconnection Points Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16

Why change? New UNC rules are required to allow compliance with the amended EU CAM code. There are currently no applicable rules in the GB commercial framework regarding the release of incremental capacity at Interconnection Points.

Options The incremental process shall be reflected in the GB network codes to provide clarity on how the EU wide process fits in with the existing GB commercial framework. In the event National Grid were to implement the CAM rules without a corresponding UNC modification then there would be a lack of transparency and clarity around the process. National Grid shall also propose corresponding changes to capacity methodology statements as appropriate (however these must be as well as, not instead of the UNC modification).

Solution The solution can broadly be split into 4 sections. Rules for a demand assessment process whereby industry can signal to National Grid a need for incremental capacity Rules for National Grid conducting an industry consultation regarding how it will release any incremental capacity. Setting the framework for submitting the formal project proposal to the Regulator(s). Setting the framework for rules on how National Grid will allocate incremental capacity.

Recommended Steps The Proposer recommends that this modification should be: Not subject to self-governance because the proposal May have a material effect on competition in the shipping and transportation of gas as well as the security of supply for GB. Will introduce different rules for releasing incremental capacity at IPs compared to non-IPs which may be appropriate for the Authority to consider. Workgroup assessment to develop the modification for 3 months (Nov, Dec, Jan).