Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

17 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 US DHCAL integration with CALICE DAQ Paul Dauncey.
Measuring Cosmic Ray Flux with a trigger and CAMAC readout - Page 1 Connect the Fluke 415 HV supply output to the input of the voltage distribution box.
The Angra Neutrino Detector Detector, VETO and electronics conceptual design Laudo Barbosa (May 18th, 2006) Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF)
24 September 2002Paul Dauncey1 Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
28 February 2003Paul Dauncey - HCAL Readout1 HCAL Readout and DAQ using the ECAL Readout Boards Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
20 Feb 2002Readout electronics1 Status of the readout design Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Basic concept Features of proposal VFE interface issues.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
2 July 2003Paul Dauncey - DAQ1 Progress on CALICE DAQ Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
MINER A NuMI MINER A DAQ Review 12 September 2005 D. Casper UC Irvine WBS7: Electronics and Data Acquisition  Overview (this talk): D. Casper  Front-end.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
4 Dec 2001First ideas for readout/DAQ1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Contributions from all of UK: result of brainstorming meeting in Birmingham on 13.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 CALICE: Status report Paul Dauncey, Imperial College for Birmingham, Cambridge Manchester, UCL Outline: CALICE and the ECAL.
LCWS Apr 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group: A. Baird, D. Bowerman,
29 January 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE DAQ1 UK ECAL Hardware Status David Ward (for Paul Dauncey)
2 April 2003Paul Dauncey - CALICE DAQ1 First Ideas For CALICE Beam Test DAQ Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK for IC, Manchester, RAL, UCL.
21 January 2003Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics1 UK Electronics Status and Issues Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
14 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
DAQ MICO Report Online Monitoring: –Status All histograms are now implemented Still not fully online –Only monitoring from data file (slightly offline,
7 Nov 2007Paul Dauncey1 Test results from Imperial Basic tests Source tests Firmware status Jamie Ballin, Paul Dauncey, Anne-Marie Magnan, Matt Noy Imperial.
26 Jan 2010Paul Dauncey1 DESY beam test preparations Paul Dauncey.
18 Jan 2006DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 DAQ/Online: readiness for DESY and CERN beam tests Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
ECFA Sep 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P.
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
LHC Collimation Project Integration into the control system Michel Jonker External Review of the LHC Collimation Project 1 July 2004.
16 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 DECAL beam test at CERN Paul Dauncey for the CALICE-UK/SPiDeR groups: Birmingham, Bristol, Imperial, Oxford, RAL.
HBD electronics status All the ADC and XMIT boards are installed. –Top 3 crates are for the ADC, XMIT boards –Bottom crate is for test pulse boards/future.
Update on the Triple GEM Detectors for Muon Tomography K. Gnanvo, M. Hohlmann, L. Grasso, A. Quintero Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL.
1 October 2003Paul Dauncey1 Mechanics components will be complete by end of year To assemble ECAL, they need the VFE boards VFE boards require VFE chips.
5 February 2003Paul Dauncey - Calice Status1 CALICE Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London For the CALICE-UK groups: Birmingham, Cambridge, Imperial,
26 September 2003Paul Dauncey - DAQ1 System-wide triggering and DAQ issues Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
Trigger Commissioning Workshop, Fermilab Monica Tecchio Aug. 17, 2000 Level 2 Calorimeter and Level 2 Isolation Trigger Status Report Monica Tecchio University.
Update on the project - selected topics - Valeria Bartsch, Martin Postranecky, Matthew Warren, Matthew Wing University College London CALICE a calorimeter.
LCWS Apr 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For CALICE-UK electronics group: A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey,
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
1 Plans for first beams - - triggers from the BRM group (BSC, BPTX) Gábor Veres for the BRM group CMS Trigger Technical Coordination Meeting 8 October,
Custom mechanical sensor support (left and below) allows up to six sensors to be stacked at precise positions relative to each other in beam The e+e- international.
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
ECFA Workshop, Warsaw, June G. Eckerlin Data Acquisition for the ILD G. Eckerlin ILD Meeting ILC ECFA Workshop, Warsaw, June 11 th 2008 DAQ Concept.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
G. Drake Electronics for DHCAL R&D Oct. 13, 2005 p. 1.
Technical Review: DAQ/Online
Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee
PreShower Characterisations
Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Vito Palladino Straw Working Group 23/3/2015
CALICE(-UK) Status Paul Dauncey 28 Apr 2004 Paul Dauncey.
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
PADME L0 Trigger Processor
Luminosity Monitor Status
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
SEABAS/EUTelescope Integration Idea
ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints
CDR Project Summary and Issues
EMC Electronics and Trigger Review and Trigger Plan
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
UK ECAL Hardware Status
CALICE Readout Front End FPGA Development
Post CALICE thoughts Paul Dauncey 28 Apr 2004 Paul Dauncey.
BESIII EMC electronics
Tracker Software Status
DECAL beam test at CERN Paul Dauncey for the CALICE-UK/SPiDeR groups:
Imperial laser system and analysis
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
Proposal Organisation
Paul Dauncey Imperial College London
Presentation transcript:

Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

Trigger requirements Need clean data to compare carefully with simulation No double particle events, beam halo, cosmics, etc. Must veto any events with more than one particle Obvious: no trigger if previous particle within ~1ms Less obvious: no trigger if following particle with ~150ns, i.e. before VFE sample-and-hold time CR-RC shaping in units of shaping time tS ~ 180ns 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

Trigger issues Want to discuss the issues for triggering here No commitment for providing trigger yet (certainly not from the UK!) I hope this starts a discussion of what will be needed UK interest here as we are building readout electronics and DAQ which uses the output of the trigger logic Soon need to decide what logic goes where I will describe a possible system “Straw man” proposal to get people thinking How much we actually use is still to be decided 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

“Activity” and “Trigger” Assume for now a simple scintillator trigger Concept works fine for scintillating fibre hodoscope also Define two levels of scintillator logic condition “Activity”; OR of hits in the scintillators, i.e. any activity “Trigger”; AND of hits in the scintillators, i.e. good central beam particle 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

“Activity” and “Trigger” (cont) Use Activity to veto Trigger if too close in time If Trigger within ~1ms of last Activity, then prevent Trigger from being issued If Activity within ~150ns of Trigger, then abort Trigger Cannot hold Trigger during the ~150ns as it must reach the VFE chip in time to produce sample-and-hold (~180ns) Electronics must allow Trigger without subsequent readout Only other possibility is to read out state of Activity and not use events with it set when reading offline Need to be aware of “race condition”! Trigger clearly also produces Activity so must be sure it does not kill itself Requires careful signal shaping/timing 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

Cosmic pollution? Do we need to include “cosmics” top-bottom scintillators in the Activity logic OR so as to veto events with a cosmic as well? Will scintillator fit under support table for calorimeters? Risk of bias by vetoing events with large showers leaking out of sides? What is the cosmics probability to be in time with our few ms sensitive time? If low, then can be neglected 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

BaBar ECAL beam test trigger logic 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

Different Triggers Do we want other trigger conditions besides beam? Cosmics? (Now selecting them!) Anti-beam (i.e. noise events)? Clock trigger? Any others? Should these be parasitic between beam bunch trains? Exactly equivalent conditions as data taking Makes control more complex Need VME control of trigger type From where? UK electronics??? 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

Logic implementation Where will the vetos and aborts be done? Activity preventing Trigger needs Logic to generate veto Trigger aborted by Activity needs Logic to generate abort or VME interface to read out Activity status What are the signal levels to be used? NIM? LVDS? TTL? We need to be able to plug the cables into the UK crate How much of this logic should be in the UK electronics? 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

UK trigger board Single board which handles trigger input to UK electronics Distribution to readout boards within crate (and elsewhere?) Holds off further triggers until readout complete Hold off is reset via VME at end of event read Minimum functionality needed Inputs: Trigger, Abort; from trigger logic. All other timing, veto, abort etc. done in NIM Output: Hold; to trigger NIM logic to prevent further triggers Maximum extra functionality we might add Input: Trigger, Activity; all veto, abort, etc. done in logic on trigger board Also need to decide how to select different types of trigger More VME-controlled output levels? How many? Hard to build a general trigger board to cover both extremes… …and even harder to cover all possibilities between them 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey

Main questions What are the requirements for the trigger? Different types? Different veto conditions? Who will supply the hardware? Scintillators, PMT’s, HV power supplies, NIM (or similar) trigger logic units, etc? How much will be common to the beam position system? Do we want post-trigger abort in hardware or software? Timescale to decide must be soon! UK should be building trigger board (one off) in ~7 months Needed to test prototype readout boards Must know functionality of trigger board with ~2 months 24 September 2002 Paul Dauncey