Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

Probe Process New Program Request Process Substantive Change February 1, 2012.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
DEVELOPING BACCALAUREATE PROGRAMS Part 1: Letter of Intent Instructions Dr. Mollie F. DeHart District Director, Office of Academic Programs Miami Dade.
Swift Curricular Approvals: What Does it Take? Michigan State University - Office of the Provost – University Curriculum and Catalog Academic Program Submission.
DINA HUMBLE, NORCO/DISTRICT CURRICULUM COMMITTEE CHAIR CHIP HERZIG, TECHNICAL REVIEW/CURRICUNET The Program Approval Process Riverside Community College.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Library Evaluation Evaluation by the Valley Library (for new.
04 March 2013 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Program (1503) Training. Introduction Jennifer Payne, M.Ed. University Curriculum Procedures Analyst Coordinates new course, course change, distance learning,
Institutional Fees Business Affairs Office Denise Reid, Assistant Director September 21, 2015.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Institution program proposal is developed using campus processes (Review by department/division, university curriculum committee, faculty senate, dean,
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE VIU POLICY REVIEW PROCESS. STEP 1 SUBMISSION Scheduled Review  Every 5 years (at least) to Executive Responsible  Delegated.
Curriculum Development at KCC Prepared by Edward Martin Amanda Kalin ChairDirector College Council Curriculum CommitteeCurriculum Development and Program.
Program-Review Process Ohio University Link to Program Review Web Site.
Curriculum Workflow Process Form A – Change an Existing Course. Request minor course changes to active graduate and undergraduate programs. Department.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Office of Academic Programs tracks change(s); notifies Advisement; and sends copy of approved paperwork w/effective date to Registrar Office of Academic.
New Degrees, Majors, & Minors Undergraduate & Graduate Annette Anderson UW 1,
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
AP 4021: Program Discontinuance A Presentation to the Board of Trustees by the Academic Senate Presidents of Moorpark, Oxnard and Ventura Colleges September.
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop spring 2017.
Office of the Provost University Curriculum and Catalog
CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Academic Program Review
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Curriculum Development at KCC
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
Plenary II - Annual Reports
Approval Process Undergraduate – UCC
Exempted Review Expedited Review Full Review Types of Course Review
Salary Increases FY18 and
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Implement (Advertise and Admit)
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
COLLEGE OF ALAMEDA: INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGET MODEL
Office of Grant Resources
Curriculog Online Proposal Tool for Courses & Curricula
Presented by: Corinna Evett
5 Year Program Planning Process for year
RodKeller Associate Dean of Lower Division Collegiate and Developmental Education Interview August 15, 2012.

SACSCOC Definition of Substantive Change
Blue Mountain Community College Non-Academic Program Review
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree, Certificate, Minor, or Option Program:
New Certificate Program
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
Terminate an Academic Unit
Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Establish a New Academic Unit
Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program
Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Course Proposals Expedited Category II Proposal Workflow
Curriculum Committee Orientation
Fort Valley State University
Articulation Manual Faculty Senate Presentation
Start with PROGRAM REVIEW
COLLEGE OF ALAMEDA: INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGET MODEL
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location Includes OSU Cascades and any other new locations with face-to-face instruction. Excludes fully online programs offered via Extended Campus and satellite locations (e.g., Portland facility) that offer hybrid courses. New location only applies to the extension of existing degree programs; certificate, options, and minors are excluded. Full Category I Proposal Workflow Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Stage 0: Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs and Assessment (APA) Recommended review of the draft proposal prior to distribution to: external contacts (for Letters of Support), business centers (for Budget Tables), Valley Library (for Library Evaluation), Office of Capital Planning and Development (for Space/Facilities Evaluation) Proposal documents posted to the Curriculum Proposal System (CPS) by the academic unit Academic Unit(s) Proposal Support Documents Letters of Support Input from higher education institutions as well as public and private entities (all external to OSU). (Note: Letters of Support can continue to be gathered and posted to the CPS as the proposal goes through the Stage 1 liaison review process.) [Minimum: 1] Budget Tables Preparation by the academic unit’s Business Center (for new programs and some academic unit changes) Library Evaluation Evaluation by the Valley Library Space/Facilities Evaluation Review by the Office of Capital Planning and Development (for new degree or certificate programs or changes to existing space/facilities needs) Return to Academic Unit(s) from the College Curriculum Committee or Dean (Stage 1) or from review steps in Stage 2.

College Curriculum Committee Liaison Contacts Input from Faculty and Administrators (i.e., internal comments from OSU) The list of Liaison Contacts are identified in the CPS proposal by the originator. The CPS allows two (2) weeks for liaison review. [Minimum: 1] Review and Approval Steps Academic Unit(s): Stage 1 College Curriculum Committee (or delegated individual) Academic Unit Head, Chair, or Director and College Dean [Transmittal Sheet] (generated after above steps, then signed) Return to Academic Unit(s) from the College Curriculum Committee or Dean (Stage 1) or from review steps in Stage 2.

Academic Programs Committee Review and Approval Steps OSU (Internal): Stage 2 Academic Programs Committee Chair, Budgets and Fiscal Planning Committee Co-Chairs, Graduate Council Co-Chairs, Curriculum Council Chair, Executive Committee Representative, Graduate School Representative, Registrar’s Office Representative, Office of Academic Programs and Assessment (Chair) Return to Academic Unit(s) from the College Curriculum Committee or Dean (Stage 1) or from review steps in Stage 2. Budget and Fiscal Planning Committee Curriculum Council Graduate Council (if graduate program) Executive Committee Faculty Senate Provost (or Designate) Office of Academic Programs and Assessment (Proposal held by APA during the Board and State reviews) Includes reformatting of the proposal OSU Board of Trustees Note: Because of timing considerations, a proposal may be reviewed by the Statewide Provosts’ Council prior to a review by the OSU Board of Trustees.

Statewide Provosts’ Council Note: Because of timing considerations, a proposal may be reviewed by the Statewide Provosts’ Council prior to a review by the OSU Board of Trustees Statewide Provosts’ Council Review and Approval Steps State (External): Stage 3 Higher Education Coordinating Commission (HECC): Academic Strategies Committee Office of Academic Programs and Assessment (following final approval) Final review, SIS II entered, 5 year review identified, approval date entry Implementation and Communication Steps Stage 4 Implementation Process CPS Proposal: A finalized copy of the CPS proposal is sent to the Registrar’s Office for entry into the OSU Catalog, Banner SIS, Schedule of Classes, My Degrees, and to be archived. Campus Announcement: An announcement is made to the campus by the Office of Academic Programs and Assessment. Prospectus Notification and Annual Accreditation Report Stage 5 Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) OSU President or OSU Provost is notified of the program approval and its accreditation. Approval Step Note: Occasionally, the workflow will be modified due to a proposal priority or to scheduling issues. Source: OSU Office of Academic Programs and Assessment\(7-24-18, 11-20-18)