Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 1: Strategies for Active Reading
Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Intermediate-level learner
Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Curriculum Map: Teaching The American Revolution Through Mindful Engagement Mike Griggs.
Table 1. A list of interview questions with lecturers
Table 2. Result of intention to use
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Teachers Response (N= 11)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
in the last evaluation of the software
Prehistory-Middle Ages
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
Rating of Water Quality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Contrast equality of group means
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Actual descriptive example
Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female
Table 1. Conceptual Framework Learning Outcomes
Order cycle in which item n has to be sent
Table 3. Standardized Factor Loadings of EFA
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 9. The proposed administrative procedures
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Training Programs in Management and Leadership
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Geometry and Mensuration
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender
Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions Grammar Topic English Prepositions Suggested Multiple Intelligences focus Logical –mathematical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and linguistic intelligence Level Upper-Intermediate Time 50 min Goals Enabling students to learn about prepositions through multiple intelligences Teaching Aids A notebook, whiteboard, textbook, rubric, journal Procedure 1. Asking students to brainstorm writing as many prepositions as possible individually. 2. Asking them to read the prepositions they write and use them in meaningful sentences. 3. Asking them to classify the prepositions they write into time, place, and movement prepositions. 4. Analyzing and discussing the prepositions through pair working. Assessment 1. Assessing students’ knowledge of the materials learned in the class by discussing such prepositions through interacting. 2. Using a rubric including some items related to prepositions to be answered in the class. Assignment 1. Asking students to write a paragraph about any topic they choose on the different types of prepositions. Then identifying and classifying the different types of prepositions. 2. Asking students to write a journal giving their feedback on the lectures by answering some questions related to the strategies and techniques use in the class. Sanan Shero Malo Zebari et al. A Multiple Intelligences Based-Teaching of English at University Level. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 13, 948-953. doi:10.12691/education-4-13-6 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.