Introduction to Core Professionalism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A framework for teaching (Danielson, 1996) Domain 2: The classroom environment – 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport – 2b: Establishing.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
Cohort Training, Phase II November 29 – 30, 2012.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Introduction to Framework for Teaching Classroom Observations
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
The Unannounced observation
Mapleton Public Schools Educator Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Core Professionalism Understanding Hawaii's Educator Effectiveness System Introduction to Core Professionalism Educator Effectiveness System Training Introduction to the Core Professionalism measure of Hawaii’s Educator Effectiveness System http://doeohr.notlong.com

The EES Uses Multiple Measures Teacher Practice Student Growth and Learning Hawaii Growth Model Student Learning Objectives Classroom Observations Core Professionalism Tripod Student Survey Working Portfolio (non-classroom) Educator Effectiveness Data The Department values using multiple measures to capture information about teacher practice and student growth and learning. Core Professionalism is a component of the Teacher Practice half of the EES. Improved Student Outcomes 2/15/2019

Domains 1 & 4: Core Professionalism Understanding Hawaii's Educator Effectiveness System Domains 1 & 4: Core Professionalism D1: Plan/Prep Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Setting Instructional Outcomes Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources Designing Coherent Instruction Designing Student Assessments D2: Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture for Learning Managing Classroom Procedures Managing Student Behavior Organizing Physical Space D3: Instruction Communicating With Students Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Engaging Students in Learning Using Assessment in Instruction Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness D4: Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on Teaching Maintaining Accurate Records Communicating with Families Participating in a Professional Community Growing and Developing Professionally Showing Professionalism Core professionalism encompasses the wide range of responsibilities a teacher handles outside of the classroom. These activities are critical to preserving and enhancing the profession and are articulated within the Framework for Teaching Domain 1: Planning and Preparation & Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities. http://doeohr.notlong.com

Domains 1 & 4: Core Professionalism Domain 1: Planning and Preparation 1a Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1b Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes 1d Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e Designing Coherent Instruction 1f Designing Student Assessments Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities 4a Reflecting on Teaching 4b Maintaining Accurate Records 4c Communicating with Families 4d Participating in a Professional Community 4e Growing and Developing Professionally 4f Showing Professionalism The Department plans to capture more components from Domain’s 1 and 4 in the future because we value the numerous contributions teachers make to their schools and their communities outside of their classroom. However after consulting with various stakeholders, including teachers, the decision was made to start small for the SY2013-2014 and focus on just one component. This will give stakeholders more time to build more base knowledge. The first component to be measured under Core Professionalism is 4f: Showing Professionalism, which mirrors several aspects of PEP-T Duty 4 that are not captured in other parts of the EES. 2/15/2019

Framework for Teaching Book In order to build foundational knowledge, teachers should attend the one-day training introducing the framework prior to engaging in the evaluative process. Teachers should also have access to Charlotte Danielson’s book, Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. This book organizes the complex work of teaching into 4 domains, 22 components, and 76 elements. 2/15/2019

Elements of 4f Reading the detailed descriptions in Charlotte Danielson’s book will help teachers and administrators brainstorm examples of relevant evidence to collect around professionalism throughout the year. The book, which provides element-level rubrics is intended to be used alongside the 2013 Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument which contains component-level rubrics. 2/15/2019

4f Component-Level Rubric The component-level rubrics found in the 2013 edition of The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument will be used in the Hawaii EES to arrive at a level of performance for 4f: Showing Professionalism. The 2013 rubric also describes critical attributes and possible examples for each level of performance which will be helpful to teachers and administrators in deciding what evidence would be relevant to collect. 2/15/2019

Professional Growth Plan Teachers can consider the work they track in their professional growth plan, such as the workshops and classes they pursue, to be evidence of professionalism. PDE3 provides all teachers with a form they can use to document their professional growth each year. While probationary teachers track four professional goals with the Induction and Mentoring program, it is best practice for a tenured teacher to pursue two professional goals. When it is time for a teacher to apply for re-licensure, teachers can submit their annual growth plans as evidence of growth aligned to each INTASC standard. Unless a teacher is rated marginal, this activity is teacher-driven. 2/15/2019

Example Documentation On this slide you will see an example of how teachers and administrators can attach documentation and submit explanations of evidence related to Showing Professionalism in PDE3. Teachers and evaluators are encouraged to read the detailed description of component 4f in Charlotte Danielson’s book Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching as a guide for identifying relevant evidence. 2/15/2019

Understanding Hawaii's Educator Effectiveness System Levels of performance Distinguished Proficient Basic At the end of the year, evaluators should consider all the evidence of professionalism and assign a level of performance for Core Professionalism. They should then share that rating with the teacher in their summative EES conference. Unsatisfactory http://doeohr.notlong.com

http://eesteacher.weebly.com This concludes the orientation for the Core Professional measure of the EES. However, we know that this measure will continue to evolve and we look forward to gathering valuable input from teachers throughout the course of the school year. If you would like further clarification we encourage you to call the EES Help Desk or visit our website, eesteacher.weebly.com for more information. 2/15/2019