Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Advertisements

Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
OVERVIEW OF H.B HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Northwestern Consolidated School District of Shelby County Office of the Superintendent 4920 W. 600 N. Fairland, IN “State of the Corporation” 2013.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
Standardized Testing Report PSAT (10-11)  SAT (11-12) PLAN (10)  ACT (11-12) AP (11-12) EXPLORE (8) Science Assessment (7) ACT Aspire (7-8)
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Fall Regional Curriculum and Instruction Meeting September 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
PA School Performance Profile 1 Tamaqua Area Middle School.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
South Carolina Succeeds
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
March 2013 Training Session The content of this PowerPoint is contingent upon approval of the Alabama PLAN 2020 ESEA Flexibility Request by the USDOE.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
2016 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Communication Webinar:
Approved Graduation Diploma and Endorsement Requirements Effective for Incoming 9th Graders Diploma and Endorsement Options Approved September.
HB 2804: A-F Accountability
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Graduation Requirements Effective
Driving Through the California Dashboard
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
STATE ASSESSMENT DATA Madam President, Board Members, Dr. Gacutan
Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
New Statewide Accountability System
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
The LEA Accountability Model
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
CAREER READINESS INDICATOR
A-F Accountability and Special Education
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Fall Regional Curriculum and Instruction Meeting
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Spencer County Public Schools
Huntsville City Schools: ALSDE Accountability Report Cards
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Secondary Data Presentation
CA Dashboard 2018 Overview Presentation to the Governing Board
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators Presentation Topic A-F Report Card Review of the Law Report Card Indicators Report Card Prototype Questions and Answers

WHY? It’s the Law. ACT No. 2012-402 requires the State Superintendent of Education to develop a school grading system reflective of school and district performance. State-authorized assessments and other key performance indicators were used to create a profile of the School and School System. Each School and School System in the State of Alabama has been assigned a letter grade in accordance with State Legislation. Start with the law behind what we are doing… It is the legislature that wants this.

Alabama Report Card Indicator Percentages Elementary, K-8 , and Middle Schools Indicator Percentage Academic Achievement (Weighted) 40% Academic Growth (Weighted) 50% Chronic Absenteeism 10% The Report Card will be rolled out in two phases using the data from the indicators we just reviewed.

Alabama Report Card Indicator Percentages High Schools Indicator Percentage Academic Achievement (Weighted) 20% Academic Growth (Weighted) 30% Graduation Rate College and Career Readiness 10% Chronic Absenteeism The Report Card will be rolled out in two phases using the data from the indicators we just reviewed.

Academic Achievement Achievement Level Weight Level I Level II 0.5 Determined based on student achievement levels in reading and math utilizing assessments in tested grades. Academic Achievement scores reported in January 2018 are based on 2016-2017 data for students in grades 3-8 and 10 from the ACT Aspire and the Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA). Achievement Level Weight Level I Level II 0.5 Level III 1.0 Level IV 1.25 Achievement levels are used to describe student performance on the state assessments.  - Level 4 - exceeds grade level standards (exceeds) - Level 3 - meets grade level standards (ready) - Level 2 - partially meets grade level standards (close)  - Level 1 - does not meet grade level standards​ (needs support) Levels 3 and 4 are proficient. Academic Achievement 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑢𝑚 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 Academic Achievement  x 100 = Academic Achievement 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 Score

Academic Growth Growth Category Weight SGP Low (L) 25 % or less Determined based on individual Student Growth Percentile (SGP) – which measures students who demonstrate improvement in reading and math from one year to the next using multiple years of data. Academic Growth scores reported in January 2018 are based on 2016-2017 data for students in grades 4-8 and 10 from the ACT Aspire. Growth Category Weight SGP Low (L) 25 % or less Average (A) 1.00 25%- 75% High (H) 1.50 75% or more The Academic Growth indicator score is based on the weighted growth categories outlined in the table. Academic 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑡ℎ 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑢𝑚 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑠 𝑊𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑎 𝐴𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑐 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑡ℎ   x 100 = Academic 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑡ℎ 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒

Chronic Absenteeism Determined based on the percent of students who missed 15 or more days (both excused and unexcused). Chronic Absenteeism points are based on students present (by subtracting the Chronic Absenteeism Indicator Score from 100 before multiplying by the Chronic Absenteeism weight).   𝑵𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝟗𝒕𝒉 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒉 𝑨𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝟏𝟓 𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆 𝑨𝒃𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑵𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝟗𝒕𝒉 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒉 𝑨𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝑺𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕 ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎 = 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒐𝒏𝒊𝒄 𝑨𝒃𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒆𝒊𝒔𝒎 𝑰𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓 𝑺𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒆

Graduation Rate Determined based on the percentage of high school students who graduated within 4 or 5 years of first entering the 9th grade. The 4-Year Graduation Cohort for the January 2018 report card is calculated 1 year in arrears. The 5-Year Graduation Cohort for the January 2018 report card is calculated 2 years in arrears. COHORT PERCENTAGE 4-Year 80% 5 Year 20%

College and Career Readiness Determined based on the percentage of students in the 4-year cohort who met at least one of the College and Career Readiness Indicators. The College and Career Readiness Indicators are:   Benchmark on any ACT Subtest (English -18, Reading -22, Mathematics -22, Science-23) Qualifying Score on Advanced Placement (AP) or International Baccalaureate (IB) Exam (AP Exams - 3,4,5 IB Exam - 4,5,6,7) Military Enlistment Approved Transcript College or Postsecondary Credit while in High School Silver Level or Higher on the ACT WorkKeys Approved Industry Credentials

66 D School Grades: BCS District Grade A: 2.33% B: 9.30% C: D: F: The Report Card School Grades: BCS District Grade A: B: C: D: F: 2.33% 9.30% 34.88% 51.16% 66 D

PROTOTYPES: What does the Report Card look like? www.alsde.edu

BCS Next Steps/Action Plan Develop a success map that charts our path forward to improving academic achievement. Implement a set of internally developed criteria that will be used to expand and measure student achievement. Create an accountability report, based on established guidelines, that monitors academic progress across the system.

Question and Answers