Program Planning in NS Schools – a Team Approach AVRSB, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
Intervention First Regina Public Schools January 2012.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING Education Adjustment Plans EAPs.
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) What is an IEP?  a summary of the student’s strengths, interests, and needs, and of the expectations for a student’s.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Adapted Physical Education 6 Service Delivery Options Available in Physical Education and the Role of the Adapted Physical Education Specialist.
By: Andrew Ball. What do school psychologists do? School psychologists work to find the best solution for each child and situation. They use many different.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
IIT: Supporting Staff and Students at PVMS.
Partnerships for Supporting Student Success. Expectations for Participants As a result of participating in this in-service session, you can expect to.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
Individual Program Plan (IPP) Module 3: IPP Implementation.
Special Education Chairpersons as Instructional Leaders Facilitating Proper IEPs for Continuous Improvement Process in Student Academic Performance.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Fall 2014.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting October 4, 2012 Creating Effective Student Support Teams.
The Program Planning Process: A Guide for Parents
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Act 117: “Every Child A Learner” Presented by: Vermont Department of Education Vermont School Boards Association.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Christine A. Tania C, & Jessica L.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
BBSST: Building Based Student Support Team Blount County Schools James E. Carr Superintendent.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
Demonstration School LAWRENCE. Explanation of Support Assigned Executive Coach – Retired Administrator Forty Days of Coaching over 18 Months Unlimited.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Ideas taken from: Student Success DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION EDUCATOR’S GUIDE (2010) REACH EVERY STUDENT.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Individual Education Plans.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Individual Program Plan (IPP)
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS & DISABILITY CODE OF PRACTICE 2015 HOW THIS APPLIES TO FURTHER EDUCATION.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Personalized Learning Plans Understanding the PLP Process.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Inclusion of Exceptional Learners
Assessment Of, For, and AS Learning
What is the role of a school psychologist?
Comprehensive Planning
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
School Self-Evaluation 
IEP Workshop Kathryn Everest YRDSB SEAC Representative – AO – YRC
Academically Intellectually Gifted Program
Co-Teaching in the 21st Century
Grade 6 Instructional Support in Mathematics
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Grade 5 Instructional Support in Mathematics
Grade 4 Instructional Support in Mathematics
National Schools and additional needs support allocation. (Summary)
Presentation transcript:

Program Planning in NS Schools – a Team Approach AVRSB, 2012

What is the NS Program Planning Process? An 8 stage team approach to planning an appropriate education for students with specific needs, and to ensure effective transitions from the early years to adult life Based on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the NS Education Act, NS Public School Programs (PSP), and NS Special Education Policy

Members of the Program Planning Team Parent(s), guardian(s), family members School principal or designate Teachers - classroom, subject, specialist, resource, etc. Other professional staff involved Student (if appropriate) Other additional members

Why is Program Planning Important? Students with specific needs are supported to achieve their learning outcomes. (Students are more likely to succeed if members of the program planning team work together) Learning Outcomes are statements of what students are expected to know and be able to do at various points in their school career. These can be PSP outcomes or developed specifically for an individual student (individualised outcomes).

The NS Program Planning Process

Stage 1 Screening and Identification Teacher or other(s) identify challenges or areas of need affecting student success Information related to the students learning is gathered and considered (students strengths, challenges and interests, assessments, records, history, etc.)

Stage 2 Exploration of Instructional Strategies (including Documented Adaptations) by Classroom Teacher(s) At the classroom level, the teacher(s) tries different, common teaching strategies or resources to address the challenge(s) – Adaptations (which do not change the curriculum outcomes) These adaptations can be in the areas of organization, environmental, presentation/instructional, motivation, assessment and/or resources

Stage 3 Referral for a Program Planning Team Meeting If further planning is required, a referral is made for a Program Planning Team Meeting (student) summarizing student information, area(s) of concern, strategies tried to date, questions to be addressed by team, etc. Referrals can be initiated by the student, parent(s)/guardian(s), teacher(s), guidance counselor, etc.

Stage 4 Program Planning Team Meeting Includes all team members (with family involvement) Team works collaboratively to share and use all information related to the students learning and decide on further action, if needed Team may decide to gather more information/refer for further assessment and/or services, suggest/develop adaptations beyond those tried at Stage 2, or suggest developing an IPP for the student.

Stage 5 Individual Program Plan Development In accordance with NS Special Education Policy 2.6 Based on students strengths and needs May involve deletion of curriculum outcomes, adherance to the same general curriculum outcomes at a significantly different specific outcome level, or addition of new outcomes Some students may require a combination of adaptations and an IPP

Stage 6 Implementation of Adaptation Plan and/or IPP Involves instruction, assessment and reporting of the outcomes Program Planning Team members assume certain responsibilities for implementation of the Adaptation Plan and/or IPP

Stage 7 Monitoring of Adaptation Plan and/or IPP Ongoing monitoring of the Adaptation Plan or IPP, student learning and progress, and assuring that outcomes are appropriate is necessary Changes that do not alter the students learning outcomes can be made and should be recorded and shared with team members Changes that do alter the learning outcomes need to be referred back to the PPTeam

Stage 8 Review of Adaptation Plan and/or IPP Involves evaluating and reporting student progress towards meeting the learning outcomes Adaptation Plans are reviewed at least once per year and IPPs are reviewed at least twice per school year (before each reporting period or within each semester). Also IPP progress must be reported at every report period as designated by the school calendar. Classroom/subject teacher is responsible for evaluating and reporting the student's progress of SIOs. Outcomes achieved – develop/move on to new ones (either individualised or PSP) Outcomes not achieved – explore plan and consider revising outcomes and/or other areas

End Thoughts Student learning varies in many ways. To accomodate these variations, schools and teachers use a continuum of services to address the specific strengths, challenges, interests and learning styles of all learners. To do this, we diversify, differentiate, adapt and individualise.SUCCESS!