The Nuclear Weapons Convention

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Environmental Governance Report of the Executive Director UNEP.
Advertisements

Licensing Export Control in China --Experiences and Challenges Wang Daxue Department of Arms Control and Disarmament Ministry of Foreign Affairs, China.
HOW TO ADMINISTER CONTROL LISTS
Technical challenges and Opportunities in Future Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Verification Conference Title:Workshop Meeting, Vienna Name:David Keir.
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status and Implications Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 19 November, 2013.
Evolution and Resilience of the Nuclear Nonproliferation System Arian L. Pregenzer November 3, 2013.
The Future of Nuclear Weapons More proliferation or further reductions? Keith Hansen February 19, 2015.
Verification and Compliance Aspects Trevor Findlay.
April 6, NPR in Context Third comprehensive review of U.S. nuclear policies and posture –Previous reviews in 1994 and 2001 Conducted by DoD.
Challenge of Nuclear Weapons
International Safeguards VTC Lecture Series Building a Safeguards Facility Approach David H. Hanks SRNL Program Manager Safeguards Initiatives Global Security.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Planning with clear goals and objectives How the State-Level concept and objectives based safeguards are essential.
The Situation in Iraq 19 February Key developments 14 February Inspectors report to the UN Security Council Debate in the UN Security Council 16.
INT 3131 The Activities of the United Nations 1.International Peace and Security 2.Economic and Social Development 3.Human Rights 4.Humanitarian Assistance.
The Regulation of International Trade in Enriched Uranium in a New Build Era Maxine Symington.
Laser Isotope Separation – The Genie is out of the Bottle Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government.
The ICAN Campaign ICAN stands for International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear weapons.
Nuclear Nonproliferation
Monitoring the INF and START Treaties American Physical Society November 2, 2013 Dr. Edward Ifft.
Oslo, 4 March 2005Managing Nuclear Material Stockpiles in the 21 st Century 1 Nuclear Material Security and Multilateral Agreements Stephan Klement Office.
WORLD MEETING OF CUSTOMS LAW BRUSSELS 2013
NEW ZEALAND’S EXPORT CONTROLS Implementation and Status Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden Government Offices of Sweden Sweden and the Nuclear Security Summit Process Jan A. Lodding Deputy Director Disarmament.
Missile proliferation. Delivery options… Nuclear, chemical, biological weapons need some means of delivery – Terrorists may be satisfied with truck or.
Nuclear Weapons: At What Cost ? 1.little do we know 2.rough estimates: cost over time 3.recent estimates: cost at a given time 4.nuclear weapon states.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Challenges in Verification of Nuclear Weapons Reduction Treaties ANS Section.
The Nonproliferation Treaty. Atoms for Peace December 8, 1953 President Eisenhower spoke to the UN suggesting that peaceful uses of the atom be promoted.
ESARDA Working Group Training and Knowledge Management 1 Nuclear Material Subject to Safeguards G. Janssens-Maenhout ESARDA Course March 2015:
Anita Nilsson Director, Office of Nuclear Security
Report on the recent IAEA Workshop on Antineutrino Detection for Safeguards Applications Andrew Monteith Division of Technical Support Department of Safeguards.
NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY: A REGIME IN NEED OF INTENSIVE CARE International Organizations and Nonproliferation Program Center For Nonproliferation.
Origins of International Safeguards Fred Wehling Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies Thanks to: NNSA NA-243.
OSCE Experience in CSBMs Lessons Learnt
Security threats in the Middle East and Northern Africa: the problem of weapons of mass destruction proliferation Dr. Vladimir A. Orlov President, PIR.
Towards Weapons of Mass Destruction-Free Zone in the Middle East Dr. Vladimir Orlov President, PIR Center April 19, 2013.
The Future of Corruption Benchmarking in the EU European Union OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY The project is implemented with the financial.
Proliferation weapons of mass destruction © 2014 wheresjenny.com Proliferation weapons of mass destruction.
Philippine Disarmament & Non-Proliferation National Framework Jesus S. Domingo, MNSA Director for International Political, Legal & Security Affairs Office.
SINGAPORE’S NATIONAL NON-PROLIFERATION EFFORTS Seminar on Strengthening Global Disarmament and Non-Proliferation 2 November 2006, Bali.
Nuclear Weapons: The Final Pandemic Preventing Proliferation and Achieving Abolition Medicine and Nuclear War Victor W. Sidel Distinguished University.
Model of Measuring State’s Intention of Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy - as a tool of supporting IAEA integrated safeguards - 1. Introduction When we consider.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in the development of a national infrastructure for nuclear power The Nuclear Security dimension Technical.
IS ARMS CONTROL THE ANSWER? What makes WMDs different? Chem, bio, & nuke vs. conventional weapons They seem.
The State Evaluation Process Therese Renis Section Head Division of Operations B Department of Safeguards 08 February 2007.
“A world free of nuclear weapons would be a global public good of the highest order” and ICAN is a means to this goal. Sec-Gen Ban Ki Moon (Oct 2008)‏
Summary of Scientific Studies The environmental consequences of a “regional” nuclear war would cause massive global famineThe environmental consequences.
Nuclear Safety & Security in the DPRK Sharon Squassoni Senior Fellow & Director Proliferation Prevention Program Asan Institute “The 2012 US-North Korea.
The 8 th ROK-UN Joint Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues, Jeju, Republic of Korea, November 2009 NPT 2010: Prospects for a New.
1 Sixth ROK-UN Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues 3-5 December 2007 CONTROLLING SENSITIVE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ACTIVITIES Mr Jeff Robinson,
The UK’s National Defence Needs and International Nuclear Disarmament Responsibilities Final report and recommendations #NET.
WHAT HAPPENS TO DETERRENCE AS NUCLEAR WEAPONS DECREASE TOWARD ZERO? INVITED TALK AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA SIDNEY DRELL STANFORD UNIVERSITY.
STOCKTAKING OF ARF COOPERATION ON NON-PROLIFERATION 1 st ARF Inter-Sessional Meeting on Non-Proliferation and Disarmament (ISM on NPD) Beijing, 1-3 July.
Export licensing of dual-use and military goods in the Russian Federation.
UNICR-OPCW Seminar Multilateral Approaches to Non-proliferation
Assessing the Prospects of the Euroatom Treaty
Nuclear Proliferation
2. March 14 Warming up: current news discussing (20 min).
Nuclear (Non-)Proliferation
A Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty: french views
Sustained MRV capacity building in the Western Balkan and Turkey
NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT AND NUCLEAR-WEAPON-FREE ZONES
International Partnership for Nuclear Disarmament Verification
International Partnership for Nuclear Disarmament Verification
Managed Instability: The NATO-Russia Strategic Relationship
One of the most valuable stakeholders in the GEF is civil society
Nuclear Inspections in the Matrix
THE WAY AHEAD – KEY LESSONS LEARNED AND UNRESOLVED ISSUES
Examining Inspection Frequency under the State-Level Concept
US-DPRK NEXT STEPS WORKSHOP January 27, 2003 Washington DC
About the IPNDV More than 25 countries with and without nuclear weapons which are: Identifying challenges of nuclear disarmament verification Developing.
Presentation transcript:

The Nuclear Weapons Convention Verification and Compliance Aspects Trevor Findlay

Outline Goals of verification and compliance How much is enough? Verification tasks and methods Verification tools Institutional possibilities The ‘break-out’ problem Next steps

Goals of verification and compliance arrangements timely detection of non-compliance early and effective response to non- compliance in order to deter non-compliance and sustain confidence

How much verification is enough? 100% verification is impossible technically, politically and financially instead verification needs to reduce the risk of non-compliance to a minimum by: providing a high probability of timely detection raising the cost of attempting to cheat creating uncertainty in the minds of the potential violator

How much verification for a nuclear weapon-free world? unprecedented transparency: in order to build confidence unprecedented intrusiveness of monitoring and inspection: due to the international security implications of ‘breakout’ a more dependable compliance system than currently exists via the UN Security Council

Verification tasks and methods - the (relatively) easy part Dismantlement and destruction of declared nuclear weapons, facilities and delivery systems Build on START/INF measures Additional research needed on warhead dismantlement Verification of non-diversion of declared fissionable materials/facilities to new weapons production Improved IAEA safeguards, especially for timely detection at dual-use facilities (enrichment/reprocessing)

Verification tasks and methods- the hard part Verification that no undeclared weapons or facilities remain Intrusive challenge inspections and new technical means of detection needed Timely detection of resumed or new research, development or manufacture of nuclear weapons Intrusive routine and challenge inspections and constant monitoring

Verification tools transparency and confidence-building measures: declarations; self-reporting; nuclear accountancy/archaeology/forensics remote monitoring: satellites and aircraft (Open Skies); atmospheric; seismic; environmental unattended on-site, portal or area monitoring; cameras; detectors on-site inspections: permanent, routine, unannounced, challenge National Implementation Measures ‘whistleblowers’ Most are mentioned in Article V of the Draft Model NWC but with detail to come in a Verification Annex

Institutions Agency for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (successor to the IAEA?) universal membership Executive Council to handle non-compliance cases Secretariat and inspectorate, analytical specialists, weapons experts global verification, monitoring and communication systems Reformed United Nations Security Council or separate NWC Compliance Commission? more representative membership no veto

Arrangements outside the NWC ‘National Technical Means’ (HUMINT, SIGINT, ELINT) verification/compliance arrangements between former weapon states (US/Russia/China; India/Pakistan; the 2 Koreas; Israel and its neighbours) regional approaches: enhanced Nuclear Weapon- Free Zones civil society monitoring (equivalent to Landmine Monitor)

The ‘break-out’ problem Impact would depend on circumstances: warning in time to take action whether the violator uses or threatens use and for what purpose readiness and deliverability of the weapon(s) existence of missile defences virtual nuclear deterrence conventional military strength of the violator vs. the rest of the international community international community’s determination to respond

Attenuating the ‘breakout’ problem ban reprocessing of plutonium ban use of HEU for any purpose multilateralize uranium enrichment (and even mining and processing?) intrusive on-site inspections or perimeter inspections long before final destruction of weapons to deter hiding of existing weapons an aggressive lessons-learned process as nuclear disarmament proceeds

What is there to do now? nuclear transparency confidence-building measures between nuclear weapon states, including joint studies drawing lessons from existing global verification regimes (nuclear nonproliferation, nuclear testing, chemical weapons) fleshing out Model NWC, including adding Verification Annex verification research and development