Engaging Institutional Leadership

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connections to Society: Creating a Shared Future Utah Faculty Development Institute 2014.
Advertisements

A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
SEM Planning Model.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
Challenge Questions How well do we meet the need of our stakeholders?
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
Political Leadership How to influence! And Current OH Issues Carol Bannister Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom.
Investing in Change: Funding Collective Impact
Technology Leadership
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Implementation and its Correspondence to the Strategic Map ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOS AND STETSON UNIVERSITY.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
The Future of CSL in Canada Synthesis of participant responses to key questions.
Group Technical Assistance Webinar August 5, CFPHE RESEARCH METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Office of Academic Affairs January 12, 2007 Confirming Portland State’s Leadership Position and Defining Academic Priorities Campus Symposium 2007.
Making the Case for Reciprocal Partnerships in Service Learning and Community Engagement Kelly Ward Washington State University Tami Moore Oklahoma State.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
Prepared by the Justice Research and Statistics Association SUSTAINING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
Using Data to Inform our Practice in Orientation, Transition & Retention Brett Bruner, Director of Persistence & Retention Fort Hays State University Randy.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
High Potential Leader Program Brevard Public School District Nancy Rehbine Zentis, Ph.D.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Phase-1: Prepare for the Change Why stepping back and preparing for the change is so important to successful adoption: Uniform and effective change adoption.
Monitoring progress towards implementing sustainability and representing the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the curriculum at UWE Bristol Presentation.
Building Community through Inclusive Excellence
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Principles of Good Governance
Projects, Events and Training
Connecting to the Global Data Ecosystem
Types of Community Engagement Forms among Participating Institutions
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Lisa Raphael Laura Costello Jack Lumbley Melissa Dodson SEDL
Risks & Opportunities AN INTERCULTURAL, MULTI-STAKEHOLDER APPROACH
Rich plays video. Introduces Cecilia
Sustainability Planning: Keys to Success
American Mathematical Society
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Navigating Change: Scaling Up
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Student QEP Workshop Developing Student Engagement in Quality Assurance and Enhancement Eve Lewis Director.
FAC Net kick-off - Boise, ID - April 10-11th, 2013
Launch of Towards 2020 GWP Strategy.
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Joseph B. Berger University of Massachusetts Boston
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Building a Great Campus Civic Action Plan
February 21-22, 2018.
Diversity & Inclusion at UCONN
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Presentation transcript:

Engaging Institutional Leadership Judith A. Ramaley

What does your campus leadership think about and worry about most? Who do you report to and what pressures is that person experiencing (enrollment, budget issues, demands for accountability, etc) What do your campus leaders (President, Provost, VPs, Deans, chair of Faculty Senate, etc) care about and how do you know? What pressures are they experiencing? Who decided to send a team to this year’s Institute and why? Does your campus leadership know that you are at the Institute? How will they learn about your work when you return?

What do you think about and worry about most? Getting the attention and support from senior administration Finding the funding to carry on the work and expand access to HIPs in the face of budget cuts or other priorities Building faculty support and overcoming faculty resistance; working with faculty governance Managing student reactions to changing course requirements and working with student leadership Providing a convincing case to win over your critics Measuring the impact of HIPs on learning Other????

Common reasons for implementing new approaches to student engagement and success To educate all our students for a complex world To respond to demands for higher retention, graduation rates To prepare a productive workforce and to educate a more engaged citizenry To create more equitable access to meaningful experiences and success for all students To enhance relevance and connections of the campus and its curriculum to large societal issues

Q1. Your reasons for implementing new approaches to student engagement and success Who has asked you to do this and what are their reasons for doing so? How involved is your senior leadership? Why are you committed to this work? What expertise and experience do you bring to this work? What other expertise or connections does your team need and where might you go to find what you need? How does student success, engagement and equity fit into other campus priorities and who sets those priorities? Is your work already connected to other efforts to promote student success? Is there already momentum behind this?

Common ingredients required for promoting student engagement and success Shared understanding about what student success means Good information about the problems you need to address to support success for all your students and ways to monitor progress in accomplishing your goals Effective professional support infrastructure , technical assistance and incentives available to all instructors and staff A portfolio of strategies that fit your campus mission and the nature of your students Knowledge about efforts already underway on your campus to engage students and support success and the connections amongst them Support from campus leadership (administration, faculty and staff, students) and from external constituencies (policymakers, community leaders, employers, etc.)

Q2. Few campuses have all these elements in place Q2. Few campuses have all these elements in place. Pick one that needs some attention and talk about how you might fill in the gaps and build support. Shared understanding about what student success means Good information about the problems you need to address to support success for all your students and ways to monitor progress in accomplishing your goals Effective professional support infrastructure , technical assistance and incentives available to all instructors and staff A portfolio of strategies that fit your campus mission and the nature of your students Knowledge about efforts already underway on your campus to engage students and support success and the connections amongst them Support from campus leadership (administration, faculty and staff, students) and from external constituencies (policymakers, community leaders, employers, etc.)

Q3. How are decisions made on your campus that affect the curriculum and how well are you connected to these people? Who names the problems/asks questions? Who participates in the work and what roles do they play? Who identifies and evaluates options? Who shares resources to advance the work? Who cares about the choices made? Who bears the risk and who enjoys the benefits? Who interprets the results and defines success?

Q4. In sum, how many of these elements that support student success do you see on your campus? Support for collaboration across the curriculum and new approaches to faculty and student work Increasing diversity of backgrounds and interests Capacity for integration, coherence across the curriculum Support structures and technical assistance Community partnerships of various kinds New forms of accountability and analysis of impact: learning, social returns, economic returns Integration of strategic planning, budgeting, institutional research and assessment and clear decision-making

Q5. Which of these elements are not yet in place and what will it take to create them? Support for collaboration across the curriculum and new approaches to faculty and student work Increasing diversity of backgrounds and interests Capacity for integration, coherence across the curriculum Support structures and technical assistance Community partnerships of various kinds New forms of accountability and analysis of impact: learning, social returns, economic returns Integration of strategic planning, budgeting, institutional research and assessment and clear decision-making

Q6. What is missing from this list of supportive elements? What might you do to improve the environment your campus needs in order to support success for all of your students? Whose support will you need in order to accomplish this? How might you obtain that support?

Creating the assets needed for change requires a campuswide culture of engagement Access to innovative and relevant educational programs, research and information resources Partnerships that address social, economic and environmental issues Scholarship that arises from and informs efforts to promote human well-being in a healthy environment Integration of efforts across the university Culture of engagement throughout the university Capacity to engage with people and organizations throughout your local community, the state, the region and beyond

How a Change Process Works (1) Make the case for change. Question 1: What problem do you want to address and why? Create a theory of action. Question 2: What is contributing to the problem and how do you want to deal with it and why? Select a suitable project Question 3: How can you use the capacity your institution currently has to do work that is contained enough to be do-able and significant enough to make a measurable difference?

How a Change Process Works(2) 4. Launch the process and gather evidence to track the impact of the work. Question 4: Are there baseline data that you can use to compare the outcomes of what you plan to do? Where would you get it? Question 5: What evidence can you collect to track progress?

How a Change Process Works(3) 5. Review the outcomes and draw lessons from the first stage of the effort. Share the lessons. Question 6: What story do you have to tell as a team about your experience with the project? Question 7: How can you tell that story in ways that work for different audiences? Question 8: What do the leaders on your campus know/need to know about your work? How would you approach them?

How a Change Process Works(4) 6. Create a supportive environment for the change effort to continue Question 9: Is there agreement on your campus about what student success means? How might your experience contribute to other efforts underway at your institution to enhance student success? Question 10: How might your work help build momentum and a stronger case for ways to promote success for all your students? Question 11: How well did your campus culture, policy environment and infrastructure support your work on this project so far? What changes would be helpful and feasible?

How a Change Process Works(5) 7. Apply the lessons learned from your first project, expand the effort and adapt the approach to different disciplines and programs across the institution. Question 12: How can you generate interest in the work and recruit additional participants? Question 13: What adaptations will need to be made to sustain and grow the effort? 8. Continue to monitor the impact of the changes you are introducing and make adjustments as circumstances require. Question 14: How can you contribute to a culture of evidence and inquiry on your campus?

Things to Keep in Mind How are important decisions made at your institution and what frame is usually used (technical, organizational, personal)? How do you usually make sense of things? Does your approach match up with larger institutional behaviors? Is your case compelling to others who may think differently? Who already buys into your agenda and how can you recruit additional advocates and partners? Who is likely to resist or oppose your agenda and why? How can you attach your agenda to the ambitions and goals of campus leadership and how do you find out what those goals are?

Judith A. Ramaley jramaley@pdx.edu