ITE Midwestern District Conference June 20, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Green Lights Program Objectives Improve Quality of Synchronization in a Short Timeframe Noticeable Improvements to Motorists Appropriate Allocation.
Advertisements

Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
SV-ITS PROGRAM: Silicon Valley Smart Corridor Project Overview
FDOT District 3 ITS Project Update Chad Williams, P.E. District 3 ITS Engineer.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
Transportation Operations Master Plan John Ward ITS-Pennsylvania Panel Discussion Vision for Achieving Regional Mobility through ITS November 23, 2010.
Presented by: SAGE KAMIYA, P.E., PTOE
Ronald B. Achelpohl, PE Operation Green Light Mid-America Regional Council.
KC REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION. Agenda  National Perspective  OGL Video Overview  Mid – America Regional Council  Program Elements  What.
Urban landbuilding facilitiestransportation networkssystems technology National and Regional ITS Architectures Bart Cima, IBI Group February 26, 2007.
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
Gainesville Area Traffic Management System. Traffic Management System  In 1984, the original Traffic Signal Master Plan was developed for the Gainesville.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
San Jose Traffic Signal Communications and Synchronization Project Presented by Ho Nguyen City of San Jose, Department of Transportation May 12, 2009.
Florida Department of Transportation District 4 TSM&O Program Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) Installation in South Broward County ATMS.
May 22, 2003 ITSA Executive Networking Session #63 Hidden Text.
Reggie Chandra, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE Operation Green Light Manager of Traffic Operations, MARC.
By Syd Bowcott, URS Corp Bayne Smith, URS Corp.  Purpose of this Presentation  Overview of Project Area  Background  Project Goals  Stakeholders.
FDOT District 1 ITS Project Update Katherine Duvall ITS Project Manager.
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
2 Background Lake County –24 x 20 mi area –Population 690,000 –52 municipalities Congestion –No freeways –Limited 4-lane arterials –Transportation controversies.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
Minnesota I-394 ICM Corridor. What is Integrated Corridor Management? Independent Network of Transportation Systems –Freeways, including managed lanes.
Jump Starting ITS Deployment in Los Angeles County using Wireless Communications Lessons Learned.
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
Infrastructure Security Leveraging the ITS Experience Base Presented at ITS America Commercial Vehicle and Mobility Forum K.K Saxena, CCP Principal Kimley-Horn.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
SunGuide SM Software: Development Status Robert W. Heller, Ph.D. July 14, 2004.
Georgia’s Regional Traffic Operations Program Christopher Barrow, E.I.T. Traffic Engineer II.
ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FEBRUARY 13, 2007.
Orange County Traffic Signal System Consolidation of Services Study Commission Meeting September 8, 2005.
Tennessee DOT SmartWay Update Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006 Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006.
Regional Concept of Transportation Operations: The Hampton Roads Experience Presented by: Camelia Ravanbakht, PhD Talking Technology & Transportation (T3)
SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION STUDY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
Bay County’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Keith C. Bryant, P.E., PTOE Public Works Director Bay County, FL 2015 TRANSPORTATION SYMPOSIUM November.
Traffic Management System Status Update February, 2008.
KC REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION. ABOUT MARC  Council of Governments  Metropolitan Planning Organization  Programs Aging Services Early Education.
Work Zone & Incident Management Strategies Denise Markow, PE, TSMO Administrator Susan Soucie, PE ITS Project Manager ACEC/NHDOT 2016 Technical Exchange.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
1 Benefits of ITS During Hurricane Evacuations Hurricane Evacuation Transportation Workshop April 5, 2003.
FDOT D5 – Integrated Corridor Management Program
EasyWay - conclusion.
Bell Road Adaptive Signal Control Technology (ASCT) Deployment Project
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Intelligent Transportation System
VDOT’s Operations Program Opportunities May 20, 2016
Project Overview – Phase 1
Connecting the East Orlando Communities
Operations and Service Concept
Intelligent Transportation Systems
Signal Improvement Project COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
2010 Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems Plan: 2017 Progress Report on Implementation The Florida-Alabama, Okaloosa-Walton, and Bay County Transportation.
Traffic Signal Performance Measures in a Small Urban Area
Bell Road Adaptive Signal Control Technology (ASCT) Deployment Project
An ACSLite Case Study Riva Road in Annapolis, MD
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting
When Big Data Meets Better Data
SunGuideSM Software: Development Status Steven W. Dellenback, Ph. D
Using iPeMS Performance Management Data
NEVADA TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE March , 2011 Reno, Nevada
Multi-Modal Trip Planner System (MMTPS)
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
12th World Congress on ITS November 10, 2005
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
TSMO – What Does It Mean for Planners?
Presentation transcript:

ITE Midwestern District Conference June 20, 2017

One of the nation’s fastest growing counties St. Charles County, MO St. Louis Suburbs 22 miles and 30 minutes from downtown St. Charles City to downtown St. Louis 3rd Largest County in MO One of the nation’s fastest growing counties 2015 Population estimated at 385,590 1950 29,834 16.7% 1960 52,970 77.5% 1970 92,954 75.5% 1980 144,107 55.0% 1990 212,907 47.7% 2000 283,883 33.3% 2010 360,485 27.0% Est. 2015 385,590[9] 7.0%

St. Charles County, MO

St. Charles County, MO 8 largest cities – there are officially 15 cities and 2 villages within St. Charles County

Goals and Objectives Goals To reduce travel times, delays, fuel consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and incidents, and increase mobility and reliability of travel in St. Charles County Objectives Build a communication network to support a county-wide ATMS Procure and install ATMS software and hardware needed to manage all signals in the county from a centralized location Develop and optimize coordinated signal timing plans Supply and install supporting ITS devices such as pan tilt zoom (PTZ) cameras, DMS, count stations, and travel time sensors Monitor traffic during peak hours

Multi-Agency Partnering 8 largest cities – there are officially 15 cities and 2 villages within St. Charles County

Multi-Agency Partnering 2009 - Periodic Stakeholder Meetings 2011 - Monthly Stakeholder Meetings 2012 - Gateway Green Light Advisory Board Formed (MOU) 2015 - Technical Advisory Committees to the Board 2016 - Quarterly Performance Measure Reports, Citizen Surveys 2017 - Survey Results, Public Outreach

Project Overview Gateway Green Light - Phase I CMAQ 5414 (616), Controllers, Modems, ATMS Software, Master Plan $5.0 million Construction Completed, Ongoing Support Gateway Green Light - Phase II CMAQ 7302 (638), Network $3.8 million Essentially Complete Gateway Green Light - Phase III CMAQ 5414 (623), Network, Travel Time Detectors, PTZ Cameras, Count Stations, DMS $2.0 million Anticipate Completion Fall 2017 Gateway Green Light – Arterial Management Interface (AMI) Alternate Route Plans and AMI $250,000 Complete AMI - will fund the development and implementation of alternate route plans and an Arterial Management Interface for better and faster traffic incident management on GGL controlled arterials. This project would expand upon the MoDOT incident management plans and Arterial Management Interface already in place along the I-70 corridor through St. Charles County by incorporating the GGL controlled arterials. By incorporating the GGL controlled arterials, it allows greater flexibility and more options for diverting traffic during severe incidents on I-70 and other major roadways throughout St. Charles. A traffic incident management plan would be developed for use by the GGL Operator at MoDOT’s Traffic Management Center (TMC) that would allow for quick response time during severe incidents to keep traffic moving.

Project Overview Gateway Green Light - Phase IV CMAQ 5414 (632), Signal and ITS Upgrades, ATMS Enhancements, Feasibility Study Update $2.1 million Anticipate Completion Fall 2018 Gateway Green Light - Phase V CMAQ 5414(633), Signal and ITS Upgrades, ATMS Enhancements Anticipate Completion Fall 2019 Gateway Green Light - Phase VI CMAQ 6841A-19, Signal and ITS Upgrades, Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption $2.4 million Anticipate Completion Fall 2020 Regional ITS Data Sharing (RIDSI) - Phase 1 CMAQ (in accordance with ITS Architecture) Partnership with MoDOT Regionwide ITS Data Sharing Initiative - Phase I In accordance with the St. Louis Regional ITS Architecture, MoDOT and St. Charles County are leading the effort to study, implement, and deploy this data sharing effort among other regional partners.  This first phase will lay the groundwork for identifying and implementing the technology and data standards whereby participating agencies contribute available traffic and incident information into a central data source. From that source, any agency or organization can acquire the information in a standardized format.   Partial implementation of data sharing and incident data exchange involving MoDOT and St. Charles County will be included in the project. Implementation in other parts of the region will be done in future phases. Phase I includes 3 components: Regional Transportation Communications Standardization Platform Regional Incident Data Exchange Transportation Archiving and Performance Assessment System

Evolution of Communication Design Deploy a mixed media Communications Network Fiber 125 miles existing 8.5 miles planned for Phases 4-6 Commercial Cellular 27 locations remaining Point-to-Point Radios or Leased Lines Use County Towers Open to all County / Government Agencies Federal Regulation delayed County design/deployment, therefore… Phase 1 deployment used leased TelComm for network backbone

Evolution of Communication Design Modern IP based Open Network Architecture – supports any brand of IP based Layer II or Layer III device IP Scheme will support 100,000 plus devices 1GB+ Layer III Backbone w/ Multiple Redundant Rings NTCIP Compliant Arch.

ATMS / ITS Management TransCore TransSuite software selected as GGL ATMS Same Platform as MoDOT Freeway Management System NTCIP based Supports multiple brands and types of controllers and other ITS & ATMS field devices

Project Status 340 Signals 90 Travel Time Detectors 45 CCTV 1 DMS (2 more later this year) 11 Radios 91 Video Detection Systems 4 GridSmart (Aldis) Devices Owned by 10 agencies MoDOT has over 20 additional DMS Video Detection are configured to count cars GridSmart has Count Capabilities – Both now feed count data to MS2 platform

Project Status MS2 – Count Module http://sccmo.ms2soft.com

Performance Measures 16% Reduction in Average Travel Time

Performance Measures Customer surveys will compare public perception versus measured performance Planning time index will be used which is a ratio of the worst travel time (95th percentile) compared to the free flow travel time

Customer Survey 71% Responded on signalized roadways when surveyed in 2016.

Special Events

Non-Recurring Congestion

Future Phases Data Sharing

Future Phases Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Improves response times up to 25% Reduces the intersection crash rate CMAQ Funds secured for 2019

Future Phases What’s next?

Future Phases What’s next? Vehicle to Vehicle

Amanda Brauer, PE, PTOE Roads and Traffic Manager 636-949-4790 abrauer@sccmo.org