Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI)
Advertisements

Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 6: Juvenile Offenders in.
Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Chapter 15: Part 3 Young People and the Law ©2005 Clairmont Press Georgia and the American Experience.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Give Your Assessment of the philosophy behind your state’s approach to Judicial Waiver “To provide a program of supervision, care and rehabilitation.
Understanding the “System”
PRESENTED BY: LORI ALBIN, DIRECTOR FISCAL POLICY CENTER NATIONAL JUVENILE JUSTICE NETWORK How Much Does it Cost to Put Johnny in Jail?
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.
Public Meetings on the Proposed Female Detention Center
Corrections Growth: A Long-Term Analysis of Growth in Michigan’s Department of Corrections Balancing Our Priorities: Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections?
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Data Analysis and Forecasting Project – Interim Report Delivered to the DJJ January 2008 Jennifer Lewis Priestley, Ph.D. Shan Muthersbaugh, MS Candidate.
Georgia and the American Experience
CHILDREN DON’T BELONG IN JAIL! ●In Florida, a 17-year-old mildly retarded boy who was pleaded guilty to sexual battery was strangled by his 20-year-old.
Lori Albin, Director Fiscal Policy Center National Juvenile Justice Network July 2011 Show Us the Money: Calculating the Cost of Juvenile Justice.
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
Juvenile Crime and Punishment. Causes of Youth Violence Complex interplay of factors Correlations, not predictions Accumulation of risk Number of resources.
Philadelphia Prison System Leon King, Esq. Commissioner.
Navigating the Juvenile Justice System.  Taxpayers save $2 million for each child who is prevented from beginning a life of crime  20% of teens live.
The Eckerd Family Foundation Florida’s Juvenile Justice System: An Overview DRAFT.
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division RBA Report Card – Adult Probation November 10, 2010 Update to the Criminal Justice.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee September 1, 2010 DAS Exec. Building 155 Cottage, BAM Conference Torri Lynn (Chair)Linn.
Georgia and the American Experience Chapter 15: Government of the Empire State Section 3 Judicial Branch ©2005 Clairmont Press.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Kevin Grassel March 20, Realignment redirected: non-serious, non-violent, non-sex registrant (non-non-non) offenders from State to local jurisdictions.
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
National Center for State Courts DETENTION ASSESSMENT.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
1 Juvenile Detention Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative: Detention & Equity Reform San Francisco Juvenile Probation Commission October 12, 2016.
Lesson 6: Juvenile Justice (Chapter 15 Section 4)
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
Juvenile Justice in Georgia
Juvenile Justice system
Dependency Court Flowchart
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
Overview of the Juvenile Justice System
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Rockwall County, Texas Criminal Justice System Assessment and Forecast
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Raise the Age Implementation
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
CHAPTER 1 Juvenile Justice: Definitions, Measurements and Process
Presentation transcript:

Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY 2016 December 2016

Maryland Juvenile Complaints Have Declined Significantly Complaints referred to DJS Intake declined 56.1% over ten years. Prepared by: DJS Office of Research & Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Percent of Cases Referred to Juvenile Court by DJS Intake has Declined Over the Past two Years 48.2% of complaints were referred to court by DJS in FY 2016, up from 42.3% in FY 2007, but down from the 53.4% referred in FY 2014. In FY 2016 15.8% of complaints were diverted to an informal (pre-court) DJS case, and 36.0% were resolved or determined to have no jurisdiction. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Maryland Juvenile Detention Population Declined Significantly The average daily population in DJS detention declined 39.1% in ten years, to 278.2 in FY 2016. Pre-Disposition ADP declined 46.8% in ten years to 145.8 youth in FY 2016. Pending Placement population declined 67.3% in ten years to 59.8 youth in FY 2016. Cases detained for the Adult Court now make up 26.1% of the DJS detained population. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, detention admissions for Baltimore City youth. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Maryland Juvenile Detention Population Declined Significantly Pre-Disposition Juvenile Court ADP declined 46.8% in ten years to 145.8 youth in FY 2016. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, detention admissions for Baltimore City youth. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Youth In Detention Pending a Committed Placement Has Declined Significantly Juvenile Court Pending Placement population declined 67.3% in ten years to 59.8 youth in FY 2016, and is down 69.8% from its peak of 198.3 in FY 2011. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, detention admissions for Baltimore City youth. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Maryland Juvenile Pre-Disposition Detention Placements Have Decreased for All Complaint Types Youth detained for misdemeanors has decreased 44% over ten years. Youth detained pending disposition for crimes of violence has decreased 19% over ten years.

Crimes of Violence Make Up an Increasing Percent of Detention Placement Offenses Youth detained pre-disposition for Crimes of Violence now make up almost a third of detention placements (32%), which is up from 22% in FY 2007.

Detention Placements for Non-Violent Felonies are Declining The percent of youth detained pre-disposition for Non-Violent Felony complaints has decreased by 9 percentage points over ten years. The detained population is increasingly comprised of youth with violent crimes complaints.

Statewide Pre-D Detention Placements

Juvenile Probation and Commitment Orders Have Declined Maryland juvenile probation orders declined 49.7% in ten years. Juvenile commitments declined 48.5% in ten years. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Low-Level Offenses Has Declined The proportion of new commitments for misdemeanor and other low-level offenses declined 10% over ten years. The proportion of new commitments for violations of probation has begun to decline in the last year. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Crimes of Violence Has Increased Crimes of Violence make up almost a quarter of new commitments in FY 2016. The rate of juveniles committed for Non-Violent Felonies has remained flat in recent years. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Crimes of Violence Has Increased Crimes of Violence make up almost a quarter of new commitments in FY 2016. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Non-Violent Felonies Has Remained Flat in Recent Years Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Violations of Probation Has Begun to Decline After increasing every year since FY 2007, the rate of new commitments for violations declined 5.2 points in FY2016. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Committed Youth Population Has Declined Sharply The total average daily population (ADP) of Maryland youth committed by the juvenile court to out-of-home placement declined 43.6% over ten years, from 1,018.0 in FY 2007 to 573.9 in FY 2016. From FY 2014 to FY 2016, the committed ADP dropped 36.3%, from 901.3 to 573.9. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed facility admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Committed Recidivism Has Declined In Recent Years Since FY 2010 the rate of youth released from all committed programs who got a new juvenile adjudication or adult conviction within one year dropped 6.3 percentage points, from 23.0% to 16.7% in FY 2015. DJS intends to cut the FY 2014 rate in half in five years, from 20.8% to 10.4% by FY 2019. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed facility admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions

All Measures of Committed Recidivism Have Declined In Recent Years Since FY 2010, the rate of new arrests (juvenile or adult) one year from release declined 8.6 percentage points. New resulting convictions declined 6.3 percentage points. New resulting commitment or incarceration declined 5.2 points. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed facility admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions

Recidivism For DJS Committed Facilities Has Declined Significantly In Recent Years Since FY 2010 the rate of youth released from DJS committed facilities who got a new juvenile adjudication or adult conviction within one year dropped 13.1 percentage points, from 31.0% to 17.9% in FY 2015. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed facility admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions

All Measures of Probation Recidivism Have Declined In Recent Years Since FY 2010, the rate of new arrests (juvenile or adult) one year from placement declined 4.3 percentage points. New resulting convictions declined 1.6 percentage points. New resulting commitment or incarceration declined 2.3 points. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed facility admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions