Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Corrections Growth: A Long-Term Analysis of Growth in Michigan’s Department of Corrections Balancing Our Priorities: Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Corrections Growth: A Long-Term Analysis of Growth in Michigan’s Department of Corrections Balancing Our Priorities: Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections?"— Presentation transcript:

1 Corrections Growth: A Long-Term Analysis of Growth in Michigan’s Department of Corrections Balancing Our Priorities: Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections? May 2, 2008

2 2 Citizens Research Council of Michigan Founded in 1916 Statewide Non-partisan Private not-for-profit Promotes sound policy for state and local governments through factual research – accurate, independent and objective Relies on charitable contributions of Michigan foundations, businesses, and individuals www.crcmich.org

3 3 One Theme in Michigan Corrections Since 1973: Growth Michigan’s prison population has grown by 538 percent in the last 34 years Department of Corrections expenditure and workforce sizes have reached record levels Michigan is an outlier in national and Great Lakes states Corrections comparisons Looking forward, prison populations and Corrections expenditures are projected to rise

4 4 Source: Michigan Department of Corrections Statistical Reports, Michigan Department of Corrections 2008 Prison Population Projection Report Michigan’s Prison Population Growth: 1973-2007

5 5 The number of prisoners entering prison increases The length of time prisoners remain incarcerated increases What Causes Prison Population Growth?

6 6 In Michigan, Both Have Increased The number of prisoners entering prison has increased due to: Swelling annual felony dispositions Increasing recidivism rates More technical rule violators The length of time prisoners remain incarcerated has increased due to: Decreasing parole approval rates Policy changes aimed at being ‘tough on crime’ (e.g. removing disciplinary credits and stiffer sentencing guidelines) What Causes Prison Population Growth?

7 7 Source: Department of Corrections Statistical Reports, FBI Uniform Crime Reports (Data Compiled by The Disaster Center Website) Felony Disposition Status of Michigan’s Reported Crimes: 1976-2006

8 8 Source: Michigan Department of Corrections Statistical Reports Prison Commitments: 1976-2006

9 9 Source: Michigan Department of Corrections Statistical Reports, Department of Corrections MPRI Quarterly Status Report July 2007 Recidivism and Parole Approval Rates: 1976-2004

10 10 Source: Michigan Department of Corrections MPRI Quarterly Status Report July 2007, Department of Corrections Research Section May 1995, Department of Corrections Five Years After Report September 1997 Prisoners Serving Past Parole Eligibility*: 1988, 1997, and 2006 *Prisoners with parolable life sentences are not included in the ‘Serving Past Eligibility’ category 17% 28% 31%

11 11 Source: CRC Calculations, U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics Annual Releases Spreadsheet Michigan’s Estimated Average Length of Stay: 1981-2005

12 12 How Does Prison Population Growth Affect Michigan’s Budget?

13 13 The Fiscal Effects of Sustained Prison Population Growth Corrections expenditures increased by nearly 5,000 percent in the last 34 years from $38 million to roughly $2 billion Michigan Corrections spending grew from 1.6 percent of total GF/GP expenditures in FY1973 to 21.5 percent by FY2007 Since FY2000, Corrections spending has “crowded out” spending on other major GF/GP programs

14 14 Source: Michigan Department of Civil Service, CRC calculations, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Corrections and GF/GP Expenditures Compared to CPI: FY73-FY07

15 15 The Effects of Sustained Prison Population Growth on the State Workforce There were roughly 7 times more Corrections employees in 2006 than in 1973 The percentage of the state classified workforce employed in Corrections rose from 5 percent in 1973 to 32 percent in 2006

16 16 Source: Michigan Department of Civil Service State Classified Workforce: FY73-FY06

17 17 The Effects of Sustained Prison Population Growth on Correctional Facilities There were 31 more correctional facilities, prisons and camps, in Michigan in 2006 than in 1976 Michigan has exceeded its year-end net operating capacity in 16 of the last 30 years

18 18 Source: Michigan Department of Corrections Statistical Reports Prison Facilities, Population*, Net Operating Capacity: 1976-2006 *Annual prison population numbers do not include participants in the MDOC community residential program.

19 19 National and Great Lakes States Comparisons When compared to the U.S. and Great Lakes states averages, Michigan: has higher incarceration rates has lower prison admissions rates has a substantially longer average prisoner length of stay spends the largest percentage of its total state expenditures on Corrections

20 20 Source: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics Michigan, U.S., and Great Lakes States Incarceration Rates: 1977-2006

21 21 Source: CRC Calculations, U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics Annual Admissions Spreadsheet Michigan, U.S., and Great Lakes States Admissions Rates: 1977-2005

22 22 Source: CRC Calculations, U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics Annual Releases Spreadsheet Michigan, U.S., and Great Lakes States Estimated Average Length of Stay: 1981-2005

23 23 What if Michigan’s Average Prisoner Length of Stay was one year less each year from 1990 to 2005? There would have been roughly 14,000 fewer Michigan prisoners in 2005 Michigan’s 2005 incarceration rate would drop from 489 prisoners per 100,000 residents to 351 At a cost of $28,743 per prisoner, Michigan’s 2005 Corrections expenditures would decrease by $403 million There would have been approximately 4,700 fewer Corrections employees in 2005 (assuming the prisoners to employee ratio remained the same)

24 24 Source: Pew Charitable Trusts Public Safety, Public Spending, Forecasting America’s Prison Population 2007-2011; Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, 2005; National Association of State Budget Officers, 2006 State Expenditure Report *Numbers displayed in red are smaller than Michigan’s corresponding number. Michigan, U.S., and Great Lakes States Incarceration and Spending Comparisons 2005

25 25 What Does the Future Hold for Michigan Corrections?

26 26 Five Years From Now Michigan’s prison population is projected to grow by 5,800 prisoners in the next five years By 2012 Michigan’s incarceration rate is projected to be 559 CRC projects annual spending pressures to reach $2.6 billion by 2012

27 27 Source: CRC Calculations, Michigan Department of Corrections Statistical Reports, Michigan Department of Corrections 2008 Prison Population Projection Report Historical and Projected Prison Populations and Expenditures

28 28 Citizens Research Council of Michigan CRC Publications available at www.crcmich.org Providing Independent, Nonpartisan Public Policy Research Since 1916


Download ppt "Corrections Growth: A Long-Term Analysis of Growth in Michigan’s Department of Corrections Balancing Our Priorities: Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google