Keith Ellis Vice President Marketing IAG Consulting © IAG Consulting 2009 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Symantec 2010 Windows 7 Migration EMEA Results. Methodology Applied Research performed survey 1,360 enterprises worldwide SMBs and enterprises Cross-industry.
Advertisements

Symantec 2010 Windows 7 Migration Global Results.
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Technology for the Audit Team Copyright © 2008 ACL Services Ltd. Peter B. Millar Director, Business Development 25 June 2008 ACL AuditExchange 2009.
EC Strategy Implementation Coping with Transformation Dick Scudder.
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
PROJECT MANAGEMENT BASICS
Using Metrics to Reduce Cost of Re-work Dwight Lamppert Senior Test Manager Franklin Templeton.
Business Driven TPI ® Alexander van Ewijk, Sogeti Germany Sogetis Second Testing Academy 29 April 2009.
Presentation Title | Date | Page 1 Extracting Value from SOA.
Integrating SHE Management Systems in Organizations: A case for Business Sustainability Presentation by A. Chimutanda SHAW 7-9 October 2009.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Cost Management ACCOUNTING AND CONTROL
Requirements Engineering Process
10-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 of 21 Information Strategy Developing an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy Developing.
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Learning to show the remainder
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Micro Focus Research 1 As far as youre aware, how does your organization plan to drive business growth over the next three years? (Respondents' first choices)
1 European benchmarking with the CAF ROME 17-18th of November 2003.
Trade Promotion Management Study Summary Charts
Assessment Cycle or Circular File: Do Academic Librarians Use Information Literacy Assessment Data? Megan Oakleaf & Lisa Hinchliffe Library Assessment.
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Chapter 5 – Enterprise Analysis
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
ABC Technology Project
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
Chapter 3: The Procurement Process
A Key to Economic Analysis
Interview Skills Training
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 27 Slide 1 Quality Management.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
OHT 5.1 © Marketing Insights Limited 2004 Chapter 5 E-business Strategy.
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
Commonwealth Connector Minimum Pharmacy Standards October 11, 2007.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS STUDY March 21, CONTENTS.
1 Atlantic Annual Viewing Trends Adults 35-54, Total TV, By Daypart Average Minute Audience (000) Average Weekly Reach (%) Average Weekly Hours Viewed.
1 World View Forum Patrick Cronin November 10, 2010.
Pricing: Understanding and Capturing Customer Value
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Missouri Enterprise Helping Missouri Manufacturers Make More, Sell More, Earn More Missouri Manufacturer Survey: The Top Ten Things You Told Us.
The Strategy of International Business Chapter 12
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Chapter 11: Systems Development and Procurement Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
Global Manufacturing and Materials Management
Implementing Strategy in Companies That Compete in a Single Industry
1. 2 Introduction Industry trends Engagement models Governance Innovation Case Study Summary & Wrap Up Agenda.
What is Business? © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Introduction to Business Chapter One.
Presentation transcript:

Keith Ellis Vice President Marketing IAG Consulting © IAG Consulting

Tough Question "Why are we doing this requirements stuff?!" 2

What are we going to talk about? o Some FACTS About VALUE from The Business Analysis Benchmark – 2009 o Dispel some Myths that get in the way of making improvement o Look at the future of BAs and make some predictions © IAG Consulting

A CANDID DISCUSSION ON VALUE Are you a great BA? Does your BA FUNCTION deliver Great Value? What is the difference between these? 4

MYTHBUSTING: CIOs Cant Just Hire Good People and Expect the Problem of Poor Requirements to go Away N=437 Source: Business Analysis Benchmark, 2009 Lower skilled people in higher maturity companies OUTPERFORM Higher skilled people in lower maturity companies © IAG Consulting

Define Requirements Maturity? o What elements would you look at to determine if an organization was Mature in Requirements Definition and Management? 6

Requirements: Are NOT a Document Documentation What is produced Process Who does what, when Techniques How are the steps done? Organization Develop services, resources, framework Technology Tools to enable analyst productivity or management Staff Knowledge, skill and ability of workforce Company Needs © IAG Consulting

What is Requirements Maturity? Level 1 – Performed (Ad-hoc) Level 2 – Defined (Individual-centric) Level 3 – Implemented (Consistent) Level 4 – Institutionalized (Part of culture) Level 5 – Continuously optimizing(Adaptive) Levels of Maturity: © IAG Consulting

Most Organizations are Level 1 or 2 Almost 75% of organizations have not implemented consistent requirements discovery & management practices, let alone institutionalized these practices across the enterprise. © IAG Consulting

Maturing Requirements is Valuable Requirements Discovery & Management Maturity of Organization In % of all projects A B C D A B C D N=437 Source: IAG Business Analysis Benchmark, 2009 © IAG Consulting 2009 Every Measure of Effectiveness Improves as Maturity Improves 10

Average Cost of a $250,000 Project by Maturity Level $356K $343K $309K $274K $261K $257K Maturity Level N=437 Source: Business Analysis Benchmark, 2009 Poor Requirements Affect Both Development and Maintenance Budgets Difference between these two numbers is Requirements Maturity waste… About $1 in $3 spent. © IAG Consulting

What Happens on Large Projects? Maturity Level N=437 Source: Business Analysis Benchmark, % 37% % of Development Budget Consumed by Poor Requirements Practices © IAG Consulting

Comparison of Project Success Rates: Maturity Level of Organization in Requirements Discovery & Management VERSUS Method of Development Utilized Requirements Discovery & Management Maturity Per Cent of Projects that are Successful N=437 Source: Business Analysis Benchmark, 2009 MYTH BUSTING #2: Requirements Are Still CRITICAL Regardless of your Development Approach © IAG Consulting

SO – WHATS THE VALUE OF BAS Have I answered the Question? 14

Where does RM Improvement Impact? Business Domain Technology Domain Business Analyst Productivity Efficiency in Achieving Business Objectives Major Change Efficiency IT Development Efficiency © IAG Consulting

What Impact Does Requirements Maturity Have on Business Stakeholder Groups? Here Going from to Project Success Rate:49%89% Projects that Hit Business Objectives of Development: 54%83% The Level 1 organization pays the following Premium: 35% more Time required to get to Equivalent Functionality on the AVERAGE project 56% more Time to get to Equivalent Functionality on Strategic (larger) projects ** ** From IAG Business Analysis Benchmark Study to 81.6% 53.7% © IAG Consulting

Illustration… o Two F500 organizations… One Level 4, one is Level 1 o 1,200 people o Each person gets 1 objective/year o Each objective gets the company $25,000 per year ($2000 ish per month) in incremental revenue once achieved o Each $500K in new revenue means the organization can add 1 person. o BY HOW MUCH DOES THE L4 OUTPERFORM THE L1 after 10 years Difference in Revenue © IAG Consulting

Average Difference Between ROA of Respondent and ROA of Respondents Industry Peer Group – by Maturity Level N=141 Source: Business Analysis Benchmark, 2009 Source: Reuters (comparative industry data) High Maturity Companies Outperform… © IAG Consulting

On Which Does the BA have the Bigger Impact? Business Domain Technology Domain or 19

LETS TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE OF THE BUSINESS ANALYST Predictions… 20

Some Thoughts on the Future of BAs o The BA role will always struggle: People understand the need for great requirements but tend not to take effective action The role has responsibility without authority The role is impacted by BOTH business optimization methodology trends AND Dev methodology trends There are certain activities that are very high value – and certain activities that are very low value As industry maturity rises… so to does the role become more demanding 21

My Predictions… o Lots more Level 4/Level 5 organizations and the emergence of ultra-high RM success stories o Emergence of 'professional' BA creates barriers to entry o We'll see a fracturing of the value chain: Low value tasks: decentralized, outsource, offshore, automate High value tasks: centralized, broader role, essential services o Far FAR FAR faster requirements elicitation o Tool explosion… then shakeout to fewer, more holistic, tools o Emergence of mass collaboration expertise o Rise in team-centric accountability organizational models o A swing back to data flow analysis – which seems to be getting lost in the shuffle 22

Closing Thoughts o Great requirements are not a document o Assess your current level of requirements definition & management maturity – be systematic about improvement o Focus: Understand the services your requirements organization offers. Value? Quality? © IAG Consulting

When you do answer the tough question… "Why are we doing this requirements stuff?!" o Impact on Timeliness o Impact on Budget o Impact on achieving Objectives o Impact on achieving Project Success o Impact on reducing Risk o Impact on Legislative Compliance o Impact on IP Protection o Impact on Organizational Competitiveness Catalyze your benefits 24