2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
#2. Implementing RTI, in Six Easy Steps
Advertisements

March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Illinois. Graduating Class Of 2002 Demographics State And National Test Volume Source: State, National ACT Profile, 2002, Executive Summary.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 21, 2011.
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
School Year. State of South Dakota New Accountability System.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
Yukon-Koyukuk School District Kerry Boyd, Superintendent August 12 th, 2013.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Testing Overview 2012, 2013, 2014 Presenter – Guyla Ness.
Facilitators of School Improvement February 2013 Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore Macomb ISD.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
LCAP Butte County Office of Education. STATE FUNDING $ per ADA Revenue Limit $ Categorical Programs $ K-3 CSR $
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Marin County Office of Education Overview of State and Federal Accountability March 2016 Presented By: Jannelle Kubinec.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
Bennett County School District
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.
Michigan School Report Card Update
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
Texas State Accountability
A-F Accountability and Special Education
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
How Closely Do South Dakota’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of South Dakota’s general.
How Closely Do North Dakota’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of North Dakota’s general.
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
How Closely Do North Dakota’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of North Dakota’s general.
Presentation transcript:

2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013

D-STEP South Dakota uses the Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) as a summative assessment to measure student achievement in reading and math. The D-STEP is administered annually to RCAS students in 3 rd through 8 th grade and 11 th grade. In addition, grades 5, 8 and 11 take a science assessment, which at this time is not included in the accountability process.

South Dakota Report Card The 2013 South Dakota Report Card is available to view on the South Dakota Department of Education website The website shows summative assessment D-STEP results for Rapid City Area Schools from

Summative Data The D-STEP results are just one indicator that our district uses to measure student achievement. There are ongoing formative assessments RCAS educators use to guide instruction throughout the year.

Formative Data In RCAS schools worked diligently on developing common formative assessments through the districts Professional Learning Community process. The formative assessment data, along with the summative assessment data, will guide our instruction to students throughout the year.

Transitional Phase As a nation, we are in a transitional phase with the assessment of K-12 student achievement. Work is being done on a national level to develop research-based high quality, informative measures of student achievement. Per a federal waiver, schools in South Dakota are now given a School Performance Index (SPI) score to indicate student achievement.

School Performance Index (SPI) Each elementary and middle school receives a School Performance Index (SPI) score comprised of student achievement (math and reading) and attendance. The attendance score is 20 points possible, and the student achievement score is 80 points possible (40 for reading and 40 for math), with a total possible SPI score of 100 points.

School Performance Index (SPI) High schools receive an SPI score comprised of a student achievement score (50 possible points25 for reading and 25 for math), a High School Completion score (25 possible points), and a College and Career Readiness score (25 possible points) for a total SPI score of 100 points.

Gap and Non-Gap Groups In addition to the SPI score, information is provided for each school based on what has been termed Gap and Non-Gap groups. South Dakotas Gap group consists of those groups of students that have historically (over the last three years) contributed to the achievement gap based on state assessment data. Assessment data will be re-evaluated every six years to determine the composition of the Gap group, or will be re-run when Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) are rebased.

Gap and Non-Gap Groups Currently, the Gap group contains students who are part of one or more of the following subgroups: American Indian or Alaskan Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, Limited English Proficient, Students with Disabilities, and Economically Disadvantaged students. Students not in any of these subgroups are part of the Non-Gap group. The Non-Gap group currently consists of the following subgroups: White, Asian, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and Multi-Racial.

Annual Measurable Objective To hold schools accountable, South Dakota has set unique school, district and state Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) based on the goal of reducing by half, the percentage of students in the all students group and in each subgroup, including the newly created Gap and Non-Gap groups, who are not proficient within six years. AMOs are set separately for reading/language arts and math. AMOs will be reset at the end of a six year cycle.

State Standards The 2013 D-STEP was based on the current South Dakota State Standards. RCAS has been moving toward teaching the Common Core State Standards for Math and English Language Arts.

New Assessments Per a waiver submitted to the US DOE, the SD DOE has requested that for the school year, SD districts administer the Smarter Balanced field test assessment instead of the D-STEP, as the Smarter Balanced assessment is aligned to the Common Core State Standards in Math and English Language Arts.

New Assessments South Dakota students and teachers will have the school year to familiarize themselves with the new Smarter Balanced assessment. Scores from this assessment will not be used for accountability purposes in 2014, but will offer valuable information about student preparedness and expectations.

Subgroups On the D-STEP student achievement is measured for the following subgroups in reading and math: All Students Hispanic/Latino American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black/African American Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White/Caucasian Students with Disabilities English Language Learners/Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Female Male Gap Group Non-Gap Group

Celebrations There was an increase in the High School Completer Rate from 2012 to 2013 for nearly all subgroups. Central High School had an increased SPI score (100 points possible) from points in 2012 to points in Stevens High School had an increased SPI score (100 points possible) from points in 2012 to points in 2013.

Areas of Focus Subgroups that continue to be areas of district focus are those of American Indian, Economically Disadvantaged and Students with Disabilities. The graduation rate, particularly for American Indian students, continues to be a strong area of focus.

Areas of Focus Based on the 2013 School Performance Index (SPI) scores, SD schools were ranked as either Exemplary, Status, Progressing, or Priority as described in the SD Accountability Model. In addition, there is a Focus School category that applies only to schools that receive Title I funding. All RCAS schools were noted as Progressing with the exception of three Title I schools identified as Focus Schools.

Areas of Focus These three schools will continue to take part in the South Dakota Leading Effectively Achieving Progress (SD LEAP) program using Indistar, a web-based planning tool for implementing turnaround indicators for continuous improvement.

Response to the Data RCAS will continue to use the summative data from the D-STEP, as well as ongoing formative assessments throughout the year, to guide and improve instruction.

Next Steps Next steps will include a continuation of district-wide Professional Learning Communities focused on responding to the four critical questions. 1.What do we want students to learn? 2.How will we know if students are learning? 3.How will we respond when students do not learn? 4.How will we enrich and extend the learning for students who are proficient?