Session title Christopher Murray and Neil Currant, Differences in e-portfolio success!, Starting from scratch versus ready-made materials University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GCSE mathematics linked pair pilot qualifications presentation November 2010.
Advertisements

The 21st Century Context for
Demanding Questions and Difficult Answers Alan Maddocks Carol Newbold Loughborough University.
School of Medicine FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH Does interprofessional education and working have any impact on perceptions of professional identity.
Educational Supervision & Find Your Way Around in the E-portfolio Dr Jane Mamelok RCGP WPBA Clinical Lead.
PDP and the HEAR: new opportunities? Rob Ward The Centre for Recording Achievement
Christine Slade & Keith Murfin
A Strategy to Enhance Assessment and Feedback Sheila Oliver Director of Assessment School of Dentistry.
E-Portfolios Along The Lifelong Learning Cycle: Differences Between Use, Pedagogy and Context Christopher Murray, University of Leeds Neil Currant, University.
The ENHANCE Project Intended to meet objectives of: -UWICs Technology Enhanced Learning Plan - Welsh Assembly Governments For our Futures document, which.
Context 1 Moving from School/FE into HE. Context 1 Stages 1 & 2 of the student lifecycle: raising aspirations & pre-entry support Access modules for 6.
Students’ experience of the process of practice assessment; a multi-professional case study from Social work, Midwifery and Emergency Care. Tracey Proctor-Childs;
Contents The Role of the Personal Tutor in Supporting the Transition from FE into HE. Jacki Cartlidge & Sue Riddell Learning and Teaching Enhancement Unit.
Evaluation Mary Rowlatt MDR Partners. Definition of project evaluation Evaluation focuses on whether the project was effective, achieved its objectives,
© University of Reading October 2014 E-Portfolio Tools for Reflective Practice in Initial Teacher Training From Blackboard to.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Context 2 Moving from HE to Work. Context 2 Stage 5 of Student Lifecycle Model Work-based learning Progress File for Under- and Post-graduate Nurses 2.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Dr Sean Walton, University of Bradford HEA Annual Conference 5 th July 2011.
Customisable Online Academic Skills Self-Assessment: Development and Initial Feedback Steve Briggs Nick Collis Nigel Upton.
Reflection and veterinary students Veterinary graduates are expected to be reflective practitioners able to direct their own continuing professional development.
The Enhancing Learner Progression (ELP) Project Universities of Bradford, Leeds & Leeds MetropolitanBradfordLeeds Metropolitan Part of JISC funded Distributed.
Deb Hearle and Nina Cogger.  Cardiff University: Periodic Review & Re-validation  Health Professions Council: Re-Approval  College of Occupational.
How Far Has Web 2.0 Enabled Personalisation? A Tale of Two Projects Neil Currant, University of Bradford and Leeds Metropolitan & Christopher Murray, University.
‘It looks really pretty but it’s not doing anything I can’t do without’: purpose and intention in design for learning with reflective e- portfolio tools.
University of Dublin Trinity College University of Dublin Trinity College Centre for Academic Practice & Student Learning University of Dublin Trinity.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
1 Oxford Brookes University (OBU) – School of Health and Social Care (SHSC) Students Assessment and Feedback Strategies May 2010 Pecs University International.
“Managing clinical supervision through groups” Sarah Whereat.
Professional Skills Development
Personal tutoring to support full and part time campus based students from September 2012 Sue Smith, Centre for Learning and Teaching Leeds Metropolitan.
Pebblepad: for successful student personal professional development Radiotherapy and Oncology Jo Doughty.
An exploration into first-year learners’ experience of ePortfolios, in diverse subject areas, in Scottish Higher Education Sue Murray and Susi Peacock.
Critical Partnerships: Using Peer Support to Develop Skills in Writing at Masters Level Sue Forsythe Maarten Tas School of Education
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR POSTGRADUATES.
Student role in assessment Peter Chalk Academic Leader Undergraduate Centre TB2.
Learners' Experiences of using e- Portfolios (eP) in Raising Aspirations for Higher Education and Supporting their Transition into HE. By Neil Currant,
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Medicine FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE “It Ain’t What You Do…………..” Christopher Murray.
Building Our Curriculum
From Application to Graduation and Beyond Christopher Murray University of Leeds, UK EDEN 2006.
 Digital Assessment for the YouTube Generation: Reflective Practice in 21 st Century Legal Education Nigel Firth (LLB Programme Leader)
‘Designing in’ academic, personal and professional development.
What is an effective induction (within an academic context) and how do you implement it across the whole university or college? Michael Hill Action on.
The Library Imperial College London Debbi Boden & Sue Holloway Information Literacy: Its not sexy but it’s clever!
University of Leeds Ethnicity and Cultural Diversity Network The Globe Centre, Accrington 22 nd September 2005.
PDA Introduction to Tutoring ESOL Unit 2. Developing ESOL Tutoring Skills F43W 33.
Leeds University Library Implementing an information literacy audit in the School of Healthcare, Leeds University Alison Lahlafi, Faculty Team Librarian.
Curriculum planning Proposed Collaborative working modules.
Results Student Engagement : Students generally found logbooks easy to use and practical in the hospital setting. Purpose : There appeared to be a perceived.
Our Curriculum Journey Duloch Primary and Nursery Our Curriculum Journey Duloch Primary and Nursery.
6 Key Priorities A “scorecard” for each of the 5 above priorities with end of 2009 deliverables – with a space beside each for a check mark (i.e. complete)
More Maths Grads: HE Curriculum Theme. HE Curriculum Theme Neil Challis, Mike Robinson, Mike Thomlinson (Sheffield Hallam University). Objective 4: Increase.
Resources and Support for Personal Tutors and other staff – Updates, August 2015 Contents: Online guidance, resources & FAQs for staff and students Student.
Buckstone Primary School School Improvement Plan Summary A copy of the full Standards and Quality Report and the full Improvement Plan are available on.
Welcome to the Annual Foundation Learning Conference: Putting Principles into Practice.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR UNDERGRADUATES.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
POPBL GUIDELINE BOOK FOR TEACHERS 1.Introduction to POPBL 2.Planning POPBL 3.Projects in POPBL 4.Applying POPBL in your course 5.E-learning Tools in POPBL.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Alessio Peluso 1 Critical evaluation of the module ‘Introduction to Engineering Thermo Fluid Dynamics’ First Steps in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
Personalised Learning NOCN Level 2. Induction Welcome and introductions Completion of enrolment forms Qualification Initial assessment Personalised learning.
Personal tutoring Sue Smith, Centre for Learning and Teaching Leeds Beckett University.
Continuing Professional Development for Teacher-Educators CPDC Introduction to ECCE & PES CPDC Development Team In association with the National Commission.
Sj. The need for outdoor education in the UK  During the late 1980’s and 1990’s introduction of the National Curriculum makes teaching very segmented.
Implementing flexible curricula A workshop to explore approaches for: critically reflecting on changing drivers and needs for flexible curricula and for.
Introducing the Medical Leadership Competency Framework to Foundation Doctors Zaynab Baha Naomi Brown Sally Price Malcolm Smith Salman Zaman.
Essential Attributes of Faculty Professional Development: The Excellence in Online Education Initiative Carol McQuiggan, D.Ed. Senior Instructional Designer,
Placements Administration, Placements Learning and the P3 Project
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Presentation transcript:

Session title Christopher Murray and Neil Currant, Differences in e-portfolio success!, Starting from scratch versus ready-made materials University of Leeds and University of Bradford Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning

The ELP Project Universities of Bradford, Leeds & Leeds MetropolitanBradfordLeeds Metropolitan Part of JISC funded Distributed e-Learning programme (DeL)Distributed e-Learning programme Exploring use of e-portfolios at various stages of transition in the student lifecycle model (Bradford 2004)

Student Lifecycle Model 1. Raising aspirations (from primary school age upwards, including adults) 2. Better preparation/pre- entry support (raising attainment to aid transition from school to higher education) 3. First steps in higher education (including induction programmes and assessment of key skills) 4. Moving through the system (supporting students) 5. Student success / employability (achievement and preparation for work)

Overview Progression into HE context Medical context Converting pre-existing materials / portfolios LeedsMet: Progression Module. (PebblePAD) PRHOs: Foundation Years Portfolio(Bodington) Clinical Sciences Development Portfolio (PebblePAD) New e- portfolio Bradford: Personal Development Module. (PebblePAD) Leeds: Preparation for HE Application (Bodington) Nurses: Progress File Portfolio (Bodington)

Evaluation Methodology Research population Users: 385 FE / 6 th form students. 67 undergraduates / postgraduate/graduates in health care (doctors, student nurses, clinical sciences) Staff: 16 tutors 34 supervisors 7 project team members Data collection methods Online questionnaires Interviews and focus groups s and critical incident logs Assessment of student outputs

Key Issues and Differences Design (Conversion vs Design) Assessment Feedback and interaction between staff and learners Materials Pedagogic implications

Design Involvement of supervisors/assessors/tutors in the design of e-portfolio Affect on frequency of feedback and learner engagement Feedback from tutors/supervisors A paper based portfolio needs to be modified to take advantage of e-tools

Assessment Assessment needs modification when converting Use of assessment forms in professional practice (PRHOs) exposed limitations of software. Forms scanned into system View of e-portfolio as just a filing system. Assessment forms for student nurses successfully created and adapted to e- learning methods.

Feedback - formative Formative feedback needs to be handled in a different way from paper-based, tutors have to provide comments, this was often done with trainee/student present using student login. Bradford & Leeds Preparation module designed around remote, regular feedback that could be informal. Nursing/FE-Leeds feedback provided remotely, timely and from multi-sources.

Feedback - summative Tutor attitude to assessing online work. Those used to paper-based portfolios expressed more concern over marking online Authenticity of work, When, Where, How tutors would mark? Felt more restricted typing comments than writing them. Perception that e-marking would be a greater time burden. Tutor comfort with technology

Materials Handbooks – must be rewritten Pre-existing materials outcome centred Foundation Years Curriculum-92 pages of Introduction, Instructions and Learning Outcomes transcribed to e-portfolio. Materials designed from scratch can be adapted and modified through course of use.

Pedagogical Outcomes The new e-portfolio modules seemed to encourage the development and recognition of reflective skills. Greatest Benefit for PRHO=Track Competencies Tutors have to change the way they work, particularly in terms of feedback

Conclusions Paper-based conversions were constrained by existing paper-based portfolios being run in conjunction. Involvement from both pedagogy (tutors / assessors) and technology (e-learning advisors) stakeholders. Implications for the nature of feedback Context, nature of assessment & relationship between tutor and learner.