Development of ABET Syllabus

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engineering Management & Distance Education Chi Epsilon Graduate Seminar December 2002 Available from
Advertisements

1 Comments on EC 2000: Why so much detail to tell us about EC 2000? Practices of Modern Engineering – Spring 2011 You learned where things (courses) fit.
Amy Kindschi, Patrick Eagan, Paul Ross HOTS for Independent Reading and Research ASEE June 2008.
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Good Afternoon Program Assessment Committee (PAC) Data Assessment Records and Analysis For the first three year Cycle Semesters Dr. Hussain Al-Zaher.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
ABET The Complete Report on Your Course. ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
The Balance Between Theoretical and Practical Work Within Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses Dr. Bahawodin Baha March Development Partnerships.
EE Program Student Advising Prof. Michael Green These slides can be found at:
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Incorporating Engineering Standards in the Major Design Experience William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingOctober 6, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Engineering Standards in Capstone Design William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America Washington, DC ASEE.
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ABET Accreditation Criterion 4: Continuous Improvement Direct Assessment of Learning Outcomes Dr. Abdel-Rahman Al-Qawasmi Associate Professor EE Department.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
 Engineering in the modern society  Professional profile of a modern engineer  Engineer as a key personality in the technological and social progress.
 (noun) a specification of an object, manifested by an agent, intended to accomplish goals, in a particular environment, using a set of primitive components,
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ABET Outcomes - Definition Skills students have graduation.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Continuous Program Improvement
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Information collected by Steve Barrett
Class Agenda Capstone Design Project Process 10 min
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Inculcating “Parallel Programming” in UG curriculum
Neeraj Mittal September 29, 2017
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Campus Management System (CMS): A tool to ease Continual Quality Improvement (CQI) implementation process in Outcome Based Education (OBE) Approach Presented.
Campus Management System (CMS): A tool to ease Continual Quality Improvement (CQI) implementation process in Outcome Based Education (OBE) Approach Presented.
Keys to Success in Engineering Study
Presentation transcript:

Development of ABET Syllabus 08/02/2012 Development of ABET Syllabus Adnan Harb

Outline Overview Course Performance Criteria PCs ( or Course Outcomes COs) Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) Course Learning Outcomes PCs to Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) mapping Computing of PC and PSO scores

Outline Overview Course Performance Criteria PCs ( or Course Outcomes COs) Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) Course Learning Outcomes PCs to Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) mapping Computing of PC and PSO scores

Overview Goal: Continuous improvement of the program (Instructor reflection sheet)

Outline Overview Course Performance Criteria PCs ( or Course Outcomes COs) Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) Course Learning Outcomes PCs to Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) mapping Computing of PC and PSO scores

Course Performance Criteria PCs 08/02/2012 Course Performance Criteria (PCs) or Course Outcomes (COs) Prepared by an expert in the course Reasonable number 4-6 but not more than 8 Should summarize the course outcomes Merge the chapters outcomes without ignoring any Clear and use simple sentences Use active verbs (Bloom’s taxonomy)

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Course Performance Criteria PCs Example: Electronic Circuits I 08/02/2012 A student who successfully fulfills the course requirements will have demonstrated: An ability to describe electrical signals and amplifier models. An ability to outline the relationship between the basic semiconductors principles and the corresponding electrical characteristic. An ability to describe the essence of the diode function, apply the techniques for the analysis of diode circuits through modeling the diode characteristics, and use diodes for various applications, including design of rectifier circuits. An ability to develop a high degree of familiarity with the MOSFET: its physical structure and operation, terminal characteristics, circuit models, DC biasing, small-signal operation and models, as well as its use in different amplifier configurations. An ability to develop a high degree of familiarity with the BJT and BJT amplifiers: its physical structure and operation, terminal characteristics, circuit models, DC biasing, small-signal operation and models, as well as its use in different amplifier configurations

Outline Overview Course Performance Criteria PCs ( or Course Outcomes COs) Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) Course Learning Outcomes PCs to Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) mapping Computing of PC and PSO scores

ABET Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) Student outcomes describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation. These relate to the knowledge, skills, and behaviors that students acquire as they progress through the program. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. an ability to communicate effectively. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. a knowledge of contemporary issues. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice

Outline Overview Course Performance Criteria PCs ( or Course Outcomes COs) Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) Course Learning Outcomes PCs to Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) mapping Computing of PC and PSO scores

Course Learning Outcomes 08/02/2012 Course Learning Outcomes are a subset of PSOs ( a2k ) (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.

Course Learning Outcomes an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. an ability to communicate effectively. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. a knowledge of contemporary issues. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice

Outline Overview Course Performance Criteria PCs ( or Course Outcomes COs) Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) Course Learning Outcomes PCs to Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) mapping Computing of PC and PSO scores

PCs to PSOs Mapping Recall: The goal is to assess the program

Program Students Outcomes PCs to PSOs Mapping 08/02/2012 The weight of contribution of a PC to a PSO is either Weak (1), Medium (2) or Strong (3) Total weights for a PC cannot be more than 3 (a) and (e) are the course learning outcomes   Program Students Outcomes (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) Performance Criteria PC-1 3 PC-2 PC-3 2 1 PC-4 PC-5 PC-6 PC-7 PC-8

Example: Syllabus of Electronic Circuits I

Outline Overview Course Performance Criteria PCs ( or Course Outcomes COs) Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) Course Learning Outcomes PCs to Program Students Outcomes (PSOs) mapping Computing of PC and PSO scores (Transparent)

Computing of PC and PSO scores (1/5) Activity and Elements 08/02/2012

Computing of PC and PSO scores (2/5) Performance of a Student under a PC in an Activity 08/02/2012 Example: Electronic Circuits I Question

Computing of PC and PSO scores (3/5) Performance of a Student under a PC in an Activity 08/02/2012 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐,𝑎 𝑠 = 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑎 × 𝑒=1 𝑛𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘 𝑠,𝑒 𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑒 𝑎 ∙ 𝑀 𝑒,𝑎 𝑐 𝑒=1 𝑛𝑒 𝑀 𝑒,𝑎 𝑐   where, 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 c,a s =Performance of student s under PC 𝑐 in activity 𝑎 𝑀 𝑒,𝑎 𝑐 =Mapping of Element 𝑒 in activity 𝑎 to PC 𝑐 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘 𝑠,𝑒 𝑎 =Mark earned by the student 𝑠 in element 𝑒 of activity 𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑒 𝑎 =Maximum Mark of element 𝑒 of activity 𝑎 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑎 =Weight of activity 𝑎 𝑛𝑒=Number of Elements

Computing of PC and PSO scores (4/5) Performance of a Student under a PC in all Activities 08/02/2012 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐,𝑎 𝑠 = 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑎 × 𝑒=1 𝑛𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘 𝑠,𝑒 𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑒 𝑎 ∙ 𝑀 𝑒,𝑎 𝑐 𝑒=1 𝑛𝑒 𝑀 𝑒,𝑎 𝑐 Example To assess the performance of a student (Samira), we observe that, in activity 1, she has marks of two elements that map to PC-01 with weights of 25% and 50%. In this two-element activity, which accounts for 10% of the total mark of the course, she got 30 40 and 40 60 for the first and second elements respectively. Therefore, her performance under PC-01 in activity 1 can be computed as follows: 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 1,1 𝑆𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑎 =10%× 30 40 ∙25%+ 40 60 ∙50% 25%+50% =6.94% This figure represents the partial performance of Samira under PC-01 for one single activity. To compute the overall performance of this student under PC-01 for the whole course, we sum up the partial performance figures for all activities (na= Number of activities): 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐 𝑠 = 𝑎=1 𝑛𝑎 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐,𝑎 𝑠

Computing of PC and PSO scores (5/5) Course Performance 08/02/2012 The course performance under a specific PC is averaged as follows (ns= Number of students): 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐 = 𝑠=1 𝑛𝑠 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐 𝑠 𝑛𝑠 And the score of a PSO per student is calculated: 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑝 𝑠 = 𝑐=1 𝑛𝑐 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐 𝑠 ∙ 𝑀 𝑐 𝑝 𝑐=1 𝑛𝑐 𝑀 𝑐 𝑝 Where, 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑝 𝑠 =Performance of student s to PSO 𝑝 𝑀 𝑐 𝑝 =Mapping of PC 𝑐 to PSO 𝑝 nc= Number of PCs And the course performance under a specific PSO is averaged as follows: 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑝 = 𝑠=1 𝑛𝑠 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑝 𝑠 𝑛𝑠