Unit 2 Introduction, Definition, and Logic

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Advertisements

Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
“Three Ways to Persuade”
AP Lang and Comp Ms. Bugasch May 12, 2014 Goals 1.AP Terms 2.AP MC Practice 3.AP Essay #2 – The Rhetorical Strategies Essay.
Argument: Ethos, Pathos, Logos Mr. Dison English 100.
Terms of Logic and Types of Argument AP English Language and Composition.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
AGE OF REASON – 1760s-1790s. Age of Reason Ojectives/Goals RI 11.1: Cites strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says.
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
Introduction to Toulmin Logic Scott Hale English
The Rhetorical Triangle Subtitle. How to Analyze a Written Text ▪ First, let’s start w/ the DEFINITION of rhetoric. ▪ Rhetoric: the study & the art of.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 10
Intro to Argument Appeals to Reason, Emotion, and Ethics Direct and Indirect Arguments.
Introduction to Argument Chapter 2 (Pgs ) AP Language Demi Greiner | Arlyn Rodriguez Period 4.
Structures of Reasoning Models of Argumentation. Review Syllogism All syllogisms have 3 parts: Major Premise- Minor Premise Conclusion Categorical Syllogism:
Kathy Bonilla, Emily Parker, Gabby Zito, and Chris Toy.
SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING. WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor.
Weapon of Legal Instruction
Writing an Argumentative Essay
A Lesson on Rhetorical Appeals: Ethos, Pathos, Logos
Tuesday September 13th In an argument essay, the writer takes a stand on a particular issue and develops a logical presentation of the issue to persuade.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY.
Debating Tips and Strategies
In other words, people are lying to you ALL THE TIME…
Debating Tips and Strategies
Rhetoric The art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques.
Let’s play.
The Final Exam.
Debating Tips and Strategies
AP Language and Composition
AP Language and Composition
Day 3 – How does an author appeal to the audience?
Intro to Rhetorical Analysis
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
The In-Class Critical Essay
Lesson 5: Brave New World, Chapter 3
Overview: Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Argumentative Writing
AP Language and Composition: Documentary
I hope you had a great half day!
Unit 2 Overview fallacy Analysis
Argumentation Strategies
Unit 3, Lesson 2: Unit Introduction and Historical Context
“Three Ways to Persuade”
Debating Tips and Strategies
Arguments have Logic.
Agenda Bell Ringer – MUGshot Sentence Review Logos
AP Language and Composition
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.
Persuasion Basics Persuasion is the use of words or images to influence the actions and opinions of others. It is trying to convince others that your opinions.
Introduction to Logic start a new RAW Book entry (#7)
D11 – Bellringer Which of the following topics is most interesting to you? Let’s pick one, research, and debate! (20 minute research, 15 to debate!) Format:
AGE OF REASON – 1760s-1790s.
AGE OF REASON – 1760s-1790s.
Unit 6, Day 11 I can construct well developed paragraphs and organize ideas effectively.
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Defining the Issue at Hand:
Syllogisms and Enthymemes.
Intro to Rhetorical Analysis
Syllogisms.
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
S.M.E.L.L. Method For argument analysis.
Debating Tips and Strategies
Validity and Soundness, Again
Debating Tips and Strategies
Analysis of Argument A Guide for Students.
Presentation transcript:

Unit 2 Introduction, Definition, and Logic I can analyze how an author logically structures an argument. I can analyze how defining a term or issue advances an argument. Unit 2 Introduction, Definition, and Logic

agenda Rhetorical Device Bell Ringer Introduction to Unit Essential Questions Notes on Rhetorical Mode: Definition Review Syllogism and Enthymeme Practice Concepts with John Stuart Mill’s “On Liberty” HW: Read Everything is an Argument Chapter 13 BEFORE THE DAY WE COME BACK FROM FALL BREAK

Rhetorical Device Bell Ringer Complete the rhetorical device bell ringer for today

Intro to Unit Essential Questions As we approach election day, we will consider the following questions as we analyze and create rhetoric: What is freedom and what does it mean to be free? Should there be limits to freedom? How do people effectively argue for change to promote freedom?

Rhetorical Mode: Definition Definition is a rhetorical mode in which the speaker strategically frames the issue at hand by providing a specific definition of terms or issues that work in the speaker’s favor. THIS IS NOT A DICTIONARY DEFINITION. The definition of an issue at hand should consider the complexities and emotional implications of that issue/term and define it in a way that will advance your argument.

Rhetorical Mode: Definition Definition can be an incredibly effective defensive strategy in argument (although, you can use it offensively as well) What does this mean? We use definition specifically when the facts don’t necessarily support our argument or we don’t have enough facts. If a definition already exists for our issue or our opponent has presented a definition, we can redefine it to support our own argument.

Rhetorical Mode: Definition Definition can be an incredibly effective defensive strategy in argument (although, you can use it offensively as well) What does this mean? We use definition specifically when the facts don’t necessarily support our argument or we don’t have enough facts. If a definition already exists for our issue or our opponent has presented a definition, we can redefine it to support our own argument.

Rhetorical Mode: Definition Often, a definition is more likely to stick with an audience if we use words that are emotionally charged. (But be careful…don’t over-rely on emotion. Make sure your definition is also logical) Argument Strategy: Definition Jujitsu If your opponent uses a term whose definition actually favors YOU AND YOUR SIDE, you can use it against them. Consider the chorus from John Lennon’s “Imagine”: how does he use definition Jujitsu? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVg2EJvvlF8

Review of Syllogism and Enthymeme Syllogism is the format of a formal argument that consists of Major Premise: All A must C. Minor Premise: B is an A. Conclusion: Therefore, B must C. Example: All PLD seniors must write a research paper. Sean is a senior at PLD. Therefore, Sean must write a research paper. Enthymeme: (abbreviated syllogism) A figure of reasoning in which one or more statements of a syllogism is/are left out of the configuration. All PLD seniors must write a research paper. Sean must write a research paper.

Review of Syllogism and Enthymeme When we encounter a syllogism, we must ask ourselves TWO questions: 1) Is this syllogism logically valid? 2) Is this syllogism true? A valid syllogism just refers to its following of the logical structure and the conclusion MUST be true IF the premises are true: Major Premise: All A must C. Minor Premise: B is an A. Conclusion: Therefore, B must C. Ex: All Octopi eat spaghetti. Fish are Octopi. Therefore, fish eat spaghetti. As silly as it is—this syllogism IS VALID because IF the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true too. *Exceptions to the premises do not matter when determining validity. A true syllogism follows the logical structure, both the premises are true, and so the conclusion must be true. So, a syllogism can be VALID but UNTRUE.

Kahoot! Review of Syllogism and Enthymeme Let’s play! https://play.kahoot.it/#/k/89d1aac6-150b-4bc7-be9c-8c938aa9a4f0

Application Read John Stuart Mill’s “On Liberty” as a class. Then, discuss its premises and conclusions and how he uses definition to advance his argument. ANNOTATE as you read (especially looking for unfamiliar words). Application

Homework Read Everything Is An Argument, Chapter 12 – Style in Argument BY THE TIME WE COME BACK FROM FALL BREAK!