Summary & recommendations multi-mission synergies session 9

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Space Weather in CMA Xiaonong Shen Deputy Administrator China Meteorological Administration 17 May 2011 WMO Cg-XVI Side Event Global Preparedness for Space.
Advertisements

ESWW 5 Some ionospheric effects on ground based radar Y. Béniguel, J.-P. Adam.
1 Effects of solar activity, co-rotating interaction regions, and climate change on thermospheric density during the solar cycle 23/24 minimum Stan Solomon.
MURI,2008 Electric Field Variability and Impact on the Thermosphere Yue Deng 1,2, Astrid Maute 1, Arthur D. Richmond 1 and Ray G. Roble 1 1.HAO National.
No. 1 Characteristics of field-aligned currents derived from the Swarm constellation Hermann Lühr, Jaeheung Park, Jan Rauberg, Ingo Michaelis, Guram Kervalishvili.
Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA Space Environment Center 1 CIRES, University of Colorado 2 Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA.
Spatio-temporal structures of equatorial F-region plasma irregularities & Geomagnetic Regular Daily Variations (Sq, Solar quiet) as seen in space and at.
1 SPACE WEATHER EFFECTS ON SATELLITE DRAG 6 January 2006 Cheryl Huang, Frank A. Marcos and William Burke Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research.
Space Weather Workshop, Boulder, CO, April 2013 No. 1 Ionospheric plasma irregularities at high latitudes as observed by CHAMP Hermann Lühr and.
Abstract Since the ionosphere is the interface between the Earth and space environments and impacts radio, television and satellite communication, it is.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
H1C: Identify the Impacts of Solar Variability on the Earth’s Atmosphere Phase , Understand our Home in Space Global density, composition, temperature,
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.
M. Wiltberger On behalf of the CMIT Development Team
Measuring ITM Variability:Missions Around Geospace-Part 2 Jan J Sojka Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University, Logan, Utah
University of Colorado 1 ; Delft University of Technology 2 ; University of Alaska 3 ; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales 4 ; National Center for Atmospheric.
Data assimilation/Fusion Directions for ARQI & AQRD V. Bouchet, Manager, AQRD/ARQI.
29 August, 2011 Beijing, China Space science missions related to ILWS in China
JAXA’s Exploration of the Solar System Beyond the Moon and Mars.
Ionospheric Electrodynamics & Low-Earth Orbiting Satellites (LEOS) J-M Noël, A. Russell, D. Burrell & S. Thorsteinson Royal Military College of Canada.
Joint International GRACE Science Team Meeting and DFG SPP 1257 Symposium, Oct. 2007, GFZ Potsdam Folie 1 Retrieval of electron density profiles.
Introducing POMME Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth Star camera calibration Ring current field Static and annually varying external fields Internal field.
Ionospheric Research at USU R.W. Schunk, L. Scherliess, J.J. Sojka, D.C. Thompson & L. Zhu Center for Atmospheric & Space Sciences Utah State University.
Science Mission Directorate Understanding and Protecting Our Home Planet: NASA and Earth Science Cheryl Yuhas Suborbital Science Program Manager.
The Mesoscale Ionospheric Simulation Testbed (MIST) Regional Data Assimilation Model Joseph Comberiate Michael Kelly Ethan Miller June 24, 2013.
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm MTR, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.
Electron density profile retrieval from RO data Xin’an Yue, Bill Schreiner  Abel inversion error of Ne  Data Assimilation test.
Future China Geomagnetism Satellite Mission (CGS) Aimin Du Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS 2012/11/18 Taibei.
0 7th ESWW, Bruges, Ionospheric Scintillations Propagation Model Y. Béniguel, J-P Adam IEEA, Courbevoie, France.
What is a geomagnetic storm? A very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth; These storms result.
TS 15 The Great Salt Lake System ASLO 2005 Aquatic Sciences Meeting Climatology and Variability of Satellite-derived Temperature of the Great Salt Lake.
Thermospheric density variations due to space weather Tiera Laitinen, Juho Iipponen, Ilja Honkonen, Max van de Kamp, Ari Viljanen, Pekka Janhunen Finnish.
5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F About ESL Level 2 Processing and Data Products Some Selected Science Results Plasma depletion.
Energy inputs from Magnetosphere to the Ionosphere/Thermosphere ASP research review Yue Deng April 12 nd, 2007.
Magnetic Measurement Expert Group10-11 March 2016Warsaw / PL MAGNETOMETER – STAR-IMAGER ALIGNMENT: APPARENT EULER ANGLE VARIATION DUE TO MAGNETOSPHERIC.
Summary of Session 2M Swarm 5th Data Quality Workshop
ACC/GPSR Splinter Summary
When Lower Atmosphere Waves Invade the Upper Atmosphere
JMA Report on Satellite-based Space Weather Activities in Japan
ACC and GPS summary Christian Siemes, QWG and Cal/Val team Copenhagen, Denmark 18/06/2014.
ESA SSA Measurement Requirements for SWE Forecasts
The 3rd Swarm Science Meeting, June 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark
Rapid core field variations just before Swarm
Connecting Earth to Space: NASA Heliophysics Provides Data on how Space Weather Impacts Earth’s Environment Using NASA Van Allen Probes mission data, researchers.
S. Datta-Barua, Illinois Institute of Technology G. S. Bust, JHUAPL
The Ionosphere and Thermosphere GEM 2013 Student Tutorial
Atmosphere-Ionosphere Wave Coupling as Revealed in Swarm Plasma Densities and Drifts Jeffrey M. Forbes Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University.
Summary of part of L2 session
Utilizing Scientific Advances in Operational Systems
Disturbance Dynamo Effects in the Low Latitude Ionosphere
First validation of Level 2 CAT-2 products: FAC/IBI/TEC
THEMIS and Space Weather
Ionospheric Models Levan Lomidze Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University CEDAR-GEM Student Workshop, June.
The ionosphere is much more structured and variable than ever predicted. Solar Driven Model Since 2000, we have seen more, very clear evidence that the.
Ionosphere, Magnetosphere and Thermosphere Anthea Coster
SPP Colloquium, 16-Jun-2017, Bremen
WG Climate, March 6 – 9, 2016 Paris, France
Ionospheric Effect on the GNSS Radio Occultation Climate Data Record
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Requirements Swarm Cal/Val Team Workshop 18/06/2014
Oerstedt+Champ+Swarm → Empirical models →New parameters/knowledge
Summary and recommendations on Swarm and Space 4.0i
Future Opportunities in Geomagnetism and Electromagnetism:
Session 6 Aeronomy/ Novel applications
Satellite mission ideas using EISCAT_3D
Summary & Recommendations of EFI Splinter session 3
Evaluation of IRI-2012 by comparison with JASON-1 TEC and incoherent scatter radar observations during the solar minimum period Eun-Young Ji,
Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)
Presentation transcript:

Summary & recommendations multi-mission synergies session 9 Roger Haagmans Swarm DQW meeting, 12 October 2018

Session overview Session 9: Multi-mission Synergies Chair: Roger Haagmans Core field modeling with a combined dataset from CHAMP, DMSP and Swarm Partick Alken Cryosat magnetometer data calibration Nils Olsen Cryosat and GOCE magnetometer calibration and applications for ionospheric currents Observation capabilities of GOCE and GRACE related to the Swarm mission objectives Application of the multi-satellites observations for ionospheric climatology and space weather research Comparison of TEC specifications obtained from a data assimilation model with Swarm observations Claudia Stolle Eelco Doornbos Yurii Cherniak Ludger Scherliess Similarities and differences between SWARM and SNIPE constellation (Small scale magNetospheric and Ionospheric Plasma Experiments) Junga Hwang

Magnetometers of other satellites DMSP to bridge the GAP between Swarm and CHAMP: attitude correction, data editing and calibration. Resulting field estimates show promising results. CryoSat-2 AOCS fluxgate magnetometer (3x) calibration: includes temperature and magneto torquer correction Both before rely on e.g. CHOAS-6 as prior for calibration and/or alignment Potential for field modelling consistent with CHAOS-6 shown and also for external signals like FAC, MMA GOCE result seem also useful despite slightly higher noise level

Magnetometers of other satellites: suggestions Joint effort of a “Magnetometer calibration expert group” ? Workshop on “Multi-mission data calibration and application” about about six months from now Improved calibration/characterization of data Prepare and provide data to scientific community daily CDF files with time, position, calibrated BFGM, STR data, BNEC, flags, … Timeframe: within 3 – 6 months (well before Living Planet in May 2019) Publication describing data product, calibration process … Use CryoSat-2 dataset for gap between CHAMP and Swarm Use GOCE, GRACE(?), CryoSat-2 and in a joint modelling process with Swarm also for consistent long term modelling

GOCE and GRACE Products Available now GOCE: Neutral density Horizontal neutral (cross)wind New data products in development GOCE: Deorbit phase thermosphere data Vertical neutral wind TEC and ROTI (topside) Magnetic field variations (Delta-B) and FAC GRACE

GOCE and GRACE observation capabilities GOCE thermosphere-ionosphere data should be of high interest to researchers working on Swarm mission objectives. Significant additions and upgrades are coming. GRACE and GRACE-FO offer the potential of valuable additional synergy possibilities, with very long time series. But more work is required to achieve accessible, well-validated and documented products, with similar standards as for Swarm and GOCE. Need for ACC data processing experts on GRACE(-FO) and Swarm to come together and exchange experience.

Multi satellite (TEC) for modelling and space weather Multi satellite TEC shows discrepancies with models (Nequick, IRI): The major source of the model-data discrepancies in the EC/TEC domain comes from the topside ionosphere/plasmasphere system. The most problematic altitude region for the model/data differences was found to be within the altitudinal range of ~500-2000 km. Multi-mission TEC combination suited for studying climatologies and events like TIDs, bubbles, etc. GIAM (physics based assimilation model)model comparisons with GOCE data which were not assimilated reasonably good agreement indicating the potential of the model likely also for various Swarm observations in the future. A further developed model like this is in line with 4D-Ionosphere study intentions

Swarm and SNIPE SNIPE is Korean initiative to launch 4 nanosatellites in 2020 as small scale magnetospheric and ionospheric plasma experiment targeting: Spatial scale and energy dispersion of electron microbursts Temporal and spatial variations of plasma trough during magnetic storms Temporal and spatial variations of electron density and temperature in polar cap patches Measuring length of coherence for bubbles/blobs EMIC waves at the top of ionosphere Large amplitude disturbance of field aligned currents LP, Magnetometer, GPS in sun-synchroneous orbit of 550 km Swarm and SNIPE Synergy Potential

Multi-Mission additional observations Upper atmosphere “climate” trend analysis and studies of longer term secular variation vs solar cycle effects, quantification of energy transports by waves and other phenomena need multi-mission consistent and reliable datasets especially regarding calibration Identification and coordination of multi-mission potential and corresponding needs is targeted by a proposed working group and a potential workshop Can we make a concrete step towards this now?