PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Plotting Your Course for Comprehensive Monitoring.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services What happens after Focused Monitoring? -
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction  Federal law requires DPI to monitor programming and implementation of the ESEA requirements, Title specific.
Nonpublic School Service Updates April 3, Presenters Regina Lukich, Consultant Karl Koenig, Consultant Office of Federal Programs.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Career Technical Education Electronic Compliance Monitoring System October 23, 2014 Tawanna Fields-Mphande.
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
Updates to CCIP and Introducing the NPDS System Karl Koenig and Chantelle Rose.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Federal Programs Consolidated Review Monitoring Kelly Iorfida Education Administrative Associate Division of Federal Programs Department of Education.
LEA Federal Program Monitoring/Review Presented by: Kelly Iorfida and Norma Hull Division of Federal Programs Department of Education.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Illinois State Board of Education Innovation and Improvement Division January 13, 2010 An Introduction to the 21 st Century Community Learning Center Self.
Session 201- Basics of the CCIP Karl Koenig (Federal Programs Assistant Director) and Dr. David Cloud (Education Consultant) Wednesday October 1, 2014.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education Office of Education Equity – Title III.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Title III Evaluation/Monitoring Process and Next Steps May 7, 2009 Title III Directors’ Spring Meeting.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Title I Administration School-level Parental Involvement Plan (PIP)
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Results-based Monitoring for IDEA & ESEA Programs Office of Consolidated Planning & MonitoringOffice of Consolidated Planning & Monitoring Fall 2014Fall.
New Title I Designee Training September 17,
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Federal Programs Network Community Schools Sponsors Fall 2015.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Accessing and Completing Fiscal Accountability Self- Assessment (FASA) on BIE Native Star Link Tips -Please place your phone.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2011–2012 Federal Program Monitoring English Learner Accountability.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Electronic Compliance System Training FY16. Welcome and Overview.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
Updates to Sub-Grantees September Welcome and Overview.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
1 PACTS-Self Evaluation November 1, 2006 Video Conference Elaine Zabor Consultant Office of Federal Programs.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
21st Century New Application Navigating the CCIP
Submission Deadline: Friday, November 17, 2017
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
KDE School Assurances Due October 24, 2018
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Overview of Federal Programs Monitoring
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs

PACTS Program Audit and Compliance Tracking System

PACTS A four-tiered compliance monitoring system To fulfill oversight responsibilities as required by the No Child Left Behind Act and ESEA Monitors legal requirements

Agenda PACTS Overview –Telephone –Onsite –Self Survey PACTS –Resources and tools

Procedure for Monitoring the Three-year Cohort All districts are randomly selected for compliance monitoring in a three-year cycle Each year 1/3 of the districts receiving titles I,II-A, III, VIB, IDEA-B and ECSE funds are monitored.

Basic PACTS Framework Onsite Telephone Self Survey Data Quality Review Compliance Framework: Four-Tiered Approach

Review Criteria for Onsite 10% including the urban LEAs receive an onsite if: 1) Are in Priority, Focus, Alert and SI status 2) Have an allocation greater than $300,000

Telephone Survey Criteria District Level leadership changes Audit/Monitoring/CCIP issues Random Selection/Last review date/Consultant initiated

Self Survey Criteria All LEAs in the cohort for the present fiscal year must complete PACTS Self Survey. If LEAs in the cohort do not complete the Self Survey they must do a Telephone Survey in the following year

All users must have a SAFE account The LEA OEDS-R administrator can give access. All superintendents have the password to SAFE. PACTS Self Survey

Self-evaluation: Access: Click on PACTS once you log in to SAFE PACTS

Access: Click on Audit and Compliance-Federal Programs (PACTS-Federal)

Access: Overview

Access: Questions

Check the box to indicate the documentation

Telephone and Onsite Questions layout-like the Self Survey Schedule Tab Compliance Docs Tab-documentation required (red asterisk for the Telephone Survey) Onsite-more extensive than the Telephone

Technical Assistance TA if items are completed but not meeting requirements Many times-deadlines, make sure to check

Noncompliance If items are not compliant- red Issues/Caps items are created The LEA will have to create a Corrective Action Plan and submit it to PACTS Follow-up with a Telephone Survey the next year

Compliance Tools Review CCIP application Telephone Survey Document Onsite Review Document CCIP Notes Consultant Checklist

PACTS Support Materials: in the CCIP, Document library

Identify Key Staff Leadership Staff Federal Programs Consultant

Key Contact Questions Interview arrangements Document requests Logistics

What to Share LEA parent involvement policy School parent involvement plan School-Parent Compact

What to Share Annual Meeting Parents Right-to-Know

What NOT to Share Student Identification Do not upload large documents (financial/fiduciary, HQT worksheets for all teachers/tutors/paraprofessionals), etc. Any large documents should be kept available on site

PACTS Documentation Create a folder for each category Provide letters, surveys, data or assurances needed to comply with the criteria Review the PACTS document requirements

PACTS Documentation How long should the documents be kept? 3 years What documents should we keep? E.g. Comparability reports (knowledge management/institutional memory) Where should the documents be kept? District and school offices

Non Public Make sure to: Collect evidence of consultation Review process and collect all contracts for services provided to non-public schools Goods and services procurement is at the district level.

Collaborate Some regions have meetings and share best practices, review materials, programs, documentation strategies, or navigation techniques for federal programs. Organize your documents and materials.

Prep The Principals Make sure that the Principal understands Title I requirements and is able to articulate program design and implementation.

Title I was not built in a day Principals should embrace the ideology of Title I requirements and effectively implement the program to benefit the students.

Ask questions If you do not understand what is needed ask clarifying questions

PACTS Findings HQT Parent Right to Know Fiscal –Equipment and Time and Effort –Procurement

Technical Assistance What are the gaps in the program and how better understanding can remedy gaps

Corrective Action Steps to be taken and required actions What to submit to ODE What happens next

Questions?

education.ohio.gov For More Information

Social ohio-department-of-education Ohio Families and Education Ohio Teachers Homeroom OhioEdDept storify.com/ohioEdDept