National Arrangements for Response to Transport Emergencies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority
Advertisements

Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
The Relationship between Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguards
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Making Aarhus work in international forums A workshop on promoting the application of the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums Geneva,
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
CBSS EGNRS and Environmental monitoring in our Region Finn Ugletveit EGNRS Chair Oslo, 12 April 2011.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Cooperation in Nuclear Security David Ek Office of Nuclear Security.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Produced 27/06/05 Seeing the Future First Tom Welland Fire Services Manager.
International Atomic Energy Agency Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfill.
Emergency Exposure Situations Overview of Assessment and Response in a Radiological Emergency Generic response organization Emergency management Lecture.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Senior Regulators Meeting Technical Cooperation Programme Supporting Radiation Safety Infrastructure in Member.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
International Atomic Energy Agency THE “EMERGENCY CONVENTIONS” Interregional Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfil National Obligations in.
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency V. McClelland, NNSA, US DOE.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 Rules and responsibilities of the regulatory body Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Improve nuclear safety and reduce environmental impact – international and national practice Roundtable “Environmental Safety: Scientific and Technical.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Coordination between National Regulators for the Safety and Security of International Shipments of Radioactive Materials between Member States Stephen.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body Objectives of regulatory functions Organizational.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Burkina Faso Delwendé NABAYAOGO RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting Arusha, Tanzania 2 – 5 December 2013.
Legislative Framework and international legal instruments A.Cherf Office of Legal Affairs International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna, 5-9 Nov 2007.
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Select one hazard you know about. Discuss safe ways of dealing with this hazard together with any legislation that might.

FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Identifying capability assessment challenges and opportunities in.
11 Crisis Management.
(3.6) General requirements on resources for the establishment of IMS
Making the Connection ISO Master Class An Overview.
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness
Nuclear decommissioning: Turning waste into Wealth
Regulatory Control Training Workshop Regulatory Cooperation Forum
Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework in Azerbaijan Republic
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
GS-R-3 vs. ISO 9001:2008 Requirements - 4
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
Safe Field Research …advice from EHS.
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
AAEA Role in Improving EPR Coordination Interventions among Arab Countries Abdelmajid Mahjoub Arab Atomic Energy Agency
Module 1 IAEA Safety Standards on Management Systems.
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
United Kingdom arrangements for national registers of radioactive sources Ian Streatfield IAEA International Workshop on National Registers of Radiation.
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 15
Training Courses for RPOs
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
The EU Strategy and Action Plan for customs risk management
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
WTO – SPS Agreement Rights and obligations of OIE Members
Leadership and Management for Safety
Safety of Radioactive Waste Management in Uzbekistan
IAEA Scientific Forum 2007 Global Challenges and the Development of Atomic Energy: The next 25 years Session 3: Global Safety and Security Regime:
Regulatory Infrastructure and Transport Safety Section
EMERGENCY PLANNING GUIDANCE FOR RAIL MARSHALLING YARDS
Meeting of the Maritime Security, Environmental Protection and Operations (MSEPO) Freetown, Sierra Leone October 2017 “Environmental Management.
Stakeholder Involvement in Nuclear issues Workshop: Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development November 5-9, 2007 Why Stakeholders are.
Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities
European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)
SAFE AND SECURE TRANSPORT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL: A GLOBAL CHALLENGE THAT REQUIRES A GLOBAL SOLUTION Dr. Pil-Soo Hahn Director Division of Radiation,
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

National Arrangements for Response to Transport Emergencies. Finn Ugletveit Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority Vienna, 20 October 2011

Introduction Transport of nuclear and radioactive material by sea, road, rail or air takes place every day around the world. Many of these transports cross borders and many States are therefore involved. directly involved as the starting point or end point of the transport indirectly involved as an “innocent” third party where the transport is carried out over, through or nearby it’s territory.

Transport Safety Requirements. International recommendations and regulations for safe transport of radioactive materials have been developed by UN organisations and have been adopted by many States in order to ensure adequate safety during transport. These requirements are established so that they are commensurate with the associated real risk. The safety and security records for transport of nuclear and radioactive material are in general good.

Emergencies In spite of all regulations and safety and security requirements, we know that emergencies caused by accidents or malevolent acts may still happen.

National perspective A State (Government and authorities) has the general objective to demonstrate to the public that they always have sufficient information and capabilities to efficiently and effectively handle all kinds of events to minimize costs and thereby also maintain credibility and authority In practice save life protect health protect environment minimize economical and other consequences of society fulfill international obligations provide the public with timely and adequate information

Responsibilities It is the responsibility of a State to respond within its own jurisdiction to an emergency in the State as well as to emergencies abroad to protect the interests of the State.

Emergency preparedness Every State should establish emergency response plans and capabilities for different types of nuclear and radiological events based on risk assessments in accordance with international standards and recommendations taking an all hazards approach. Transport of nuclear and radioactive materials should therefore be included in these processes.

Nuclear and radiological events Nuclear and radiological events attract a lot of attention Perception of risk is often much higher than the ”scientific” risk, but it is the percieved risk in the public we have to deal with. The half life of some radioactive nuclides is very long

Transport Emergencies Non site specific planning. It can happen anywhere. It may happen in States with no infrastructure, plans or capabilities at all. The transport and the details of the transport often unknown to authorities . Information details of the transport to be found in a foreign State. A transport event may require specific capabilities

Challenges Planning for the unknown when information is not available. Responding in a timely manner when timely response depends on international communication. Resources required to respond to an emergency easily exceeds the capability of a stricken State, especially those with no or very limited capabilities to react at all.

Recommendation States and international organisations should continue to strengthen safety requirements for transport of nuclear and radioactive materials and to ensure their timely implementation.

Recommendation States and international organisations should continue their efforts to establish better mechanisms for providing adequate advance information about transports to States that might be affected should an emergency occur in order to allow a better and more timely response to the emergency. Due attention should be paid to the confidentiality issue to ensure that safety or security is not compromised. A better information exchange among States could also enhance security measures.

Recommendation States and international organisations should enhance their efforts to improve international cooperation concerning response to different types of nuclear and radiological emergencies during transport and in particular further enhance international assistance capabilities for such events. (This could also reduce the number of denials of shipments).

Final remark We all recognise the benefit from use of nuclear and radioactive materials and that transport is necessary to have this benefit. We also recognise the benefit from having in place the best possible procedures and capabilities for response to emergencies during transport of nuclear and radioactive materials. Let us work together to achieve this.