Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE HELP PROCESS. Professional medical equipment project management is the systematic, knowledgeable process through which all items of capital equipment.
Advertisements

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
Process Engineer’s Role in Project Management Dr Abdullah Malik.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES As-Built Drawings and Commissioning Status Steve Sawch Assistant Director for Construction Management NSLS-II Conventional.
SA Capstone Requirements and Design Week 10 SYST Winter 2013 Instructors: Jerry Kotuba & Joe Varrasso.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Construction Work Packaging
Free Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Free Powerpoint Templates How do we do it? Class 7.
Copyright 2008 Introduction to Project Management, Second Edition 2  Many people have heard the following sayings: ◦ If you fail to plan, you plan to.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Chapter 11. Intro  What is Project Management?  Project Manager  Project Failures & Successes Managing Projects  PMBOK  SDLC Core Process 1 – Project.
Page 1 BaBar IFR Mechanical, Schedule Cost Review Outbriefing (1) Excellent job on preparing and presenting review Overall, the Committee feels that the.
Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of the Mu2e Project April 3, 2012 Elaine McCluskey.
PROJECT PHASES ACT Objective To provide an understanding of the design & construction process and the roles of the different participants in this.
DUSEL Beamline Working Group Meeting March 09, :00 AM – Snake Pit (WH2NE) By Dean Hoffer - OPMO.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Report on the DOE/SC CD-3b Review of the Utilities Upgrade Project (UUP) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory August 11-12,
Complete Design & Gate Review. Complete Design Detailed Design Review (DDR) 1.“High and medium technical risk” areas –Design Review (Prelim-DDR): standard.
McDonough Bolyard Peck Educational Series Building Commissioning Presented by: Doug Wrenn Steve Baxter July
Fundamentals of Project Management and Schedule Development.
Executive Session Director’s Conceptual Design Review of Mu2e Project May 3-5, 2011 Jim Yeck.
USAID Afghanistan Engineering Support Program (ESP) Pre-Bid Meeting July 14, 2015.
Executive Session Director’s Conceptual Design Review of Muon g-2 Project June 5-7, 2013 Jon Kotcher.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE DOE/SC CD-3c Review of the Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) Project Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory June 14-16, 2016.
Project Management PTM721S
Construction Work Packaging
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Chapter 11 Project Management.
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
Container Freight Station, Utilities and Drainage at Bayport Container Terminal (RFQ-148) Brenda Trevino, P.E. Project Manager October 11, 2016.
Cryogenic Plant Controls – Cost and Schedule
Installation Procurement Package
Cryogenic Plant Electrical and Controls
Project Management PTM721S
Western Michigan University Central Power Plant
2K Cold Box PDR Introduction
Project Management W. J. Foyt
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
LCLS-II CRYOPLANT CONTROLS HARDWARE FINAL DESIGN REVIEW
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
Systems Implementation,
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Data & Technology Updates April, 2016
Opening Executive Session M.C.
Implementation Strategy July 2002
LCLS-II Cryoplant Controls Readiness to Procure
Spoke CDS PDR Closeout J. G. Weisend II June 10, 2016.
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge
Leading Indicators and Dashboarding for Advanced Work Packaging
2K CB FDR Conclusion:  Project Summary, Procurement Plan / Status
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
JEFFERSON LAB LCLSII CRYOPLANT INSTALLATION PACKAGE DIRECTOR’S PROGRESS REVIEW Welcome and Introduction Stuart Henderson June 1, 2017.
Cryoplant Installation Design Summary
Meeting of the LCLS Facilities Advisory Committee
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF-NM Project (Process Re-engineering & Optimization of Operations & Maintenance Functions.
Project Management Process Groups
Project Management Chapter 11.
Scope, Requirements Deliverables & Schedule
Documentation Chris Scanlon and Ritendra Bhattacharya
Far Experimental Hall Hutches Civil Construction
Far Experimental Hall Hutches Civil Construction
Control Hardware & Status
Testing Plan and Status
CDS-EL IRR Closeout 28 March 2019 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman.
CF Scope, Management & Organization
Q2 Updates on 2019 Board Priorities
Q2 Updates on 2019 Board Priorities
Project Name Here Kick-off Date
Presentation transcript:

Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting Committee LCLS-II Cryoplant General Contractor Installation Package Review 1 June, 2017

Committee’s Charge Are Jefferson Lab’s deliverables properly identified in terms of scope and level of detail? Yes, we concur that JLab’s deliverables are properly identified. Recommendations: Deliverables should be coordinated across the project and all team members. Is the format of package deliverables and level of detail adequate for the bid and for project execution? This is challenging to confirm in the format of this Progress Review. Conduct an overall review with deliverables from SG and Vendor information. Consider reducing drawing content or reformatting for bidding. Clearly define various equipment scopes in the drawings. Review for bidability and complete cost estimating effort. Is the present status of the Jlab scope well-described and understandable? Yes, JLab documented the status very well with the use of checklists and charts. LCLS-II JLab Director's Cryoplant Installation Review, June 1, 2017

Committee’s Charge Is the remaining work required to complete the Jlab scope properly identified? Yes, the remaining work to meet the submittal to SLAC has been identified. Recommendations: Integrate work with SG and others. Plan for completion of work to incorporate final QC review and SLAC BIO Comments Is the plan to complete credible, sufficiently detailed and appropriate? Yes, a detailed week to week plan was identified; however the plan for Mechanical indicated a later date of completion (July 7 vs June 19). Remaining Mechanical Submission may not allow adequate time for incorporation of BIO comments. Prepare for final coordination between disciplines: Mechanical, Electrical and SG. Ensure responsibilities identified for overall reviews and coordination Are the resources in the plan adequate, properly identified, and available? Yes. Plan for additional resources after FDR. LCLS-II JLab Director's Cryoplant Installation Review, June 1, 2017

Committee’s Charge Is Jefferson Lab providing the support and resources required to meet the project schedule for Jlab’s cryoplant scope? Yes Recommendations: 1. The project should stay vigilant in keeping the team focused to responding to any comments during both the procurement and construction phases of the project. LCLS-II JLab Director's Cryoplant Installation Review, June 1, 2017