Figure 2 Neoantigen presentation in the tumour microenvironment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE NETWORKS IN THE TUMOUR ENVIRONMENT AND THEIR THERAPEUTIC RELEVANCE 高丰光 Weiping Zou NATURE REVIEWS | CANCER VOLUME 5 | APRIL 2005 | 263.
Advertisements

David P. Carbone, MD, PhD, David R. Gandara, MD, Scott J
Figure 1 CTLA-4 and PD-1–PD-L1 immune checkpoints
Figure 5 Mutational heterogeneity in oesophageal and gastric cancer
Figure 1 Key elements of cancer-related inflammation
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 Radiation-induced effects on tumour cells
Figure 2 Immune-escape mechanisms of CTCs in the peripheral blood
Figure 5 Schematic illustration of different clinical trial designs
Figure 1 Generations of cancer vaccine antigens
Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi: /nrgastro
Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi: /nrgastro
Figure 1 Immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies and armoured chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells overcome immune suppression Figure 1 | Immunomodulatory.
Figure 2 Signalling pathways and physiological domains that are
Figure 1 Four nodes to target when inducing anti-tumour immunity
Figure 3 Monitoring clonal evolution using liquid biopsies
Figure 1 Key time points in the discovery and development of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal.
Figure 1 Postulated mechanisms of action of PD‑1, PD‑L1 and PD‑L2
Figure 2 Three-step approach to the assessment and management
Figure 1 Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) structures
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Antibody-modified T cells: CARs take the front seat for hematologic malignancies by Marcela V. Maus, Stephan A. Grupp, David L. Porter, and Carl H. June.
Figure 3 Natural and imatinib-induced immunosurveillance in gastrointestinal tumours (GISTs) Figure 3 | Natural and imatinib-induced immunosurveillance.
Figure 7 Clinical options for HCC therapy
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 5 Classification of immunotherapies
Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi: /nrgastro
Figure 1 CAR-T-cell design
Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi: /nrgastro
Markers of cancer cell and lymphocytes in inflammatory infiltration around a tumour as potential markers of immunomodulatory treatment response. Markers.
Figure 2 Co-stimulatory receptors as immunomodulatory targets
Figure 4 Combination immunotherapeutic approaches with imatinib
Figure 2 The association between CD8+ T‑cell density of the tumour
Figure 6 Combination therapy for HCC
David P. Carbone, MD, PhD, David R. Gandara, MD, Scott J
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Figure 4 Macrophage-targeting antitumour treatment approaches
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 3 Drug cycling with collateral sensitivity
Figure 1 A schematic representation of the role
Hiding in Plain Sight: How Cancer Evades the Immune System
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Tumor Immunity ——卓越一班 二组——. Tumor Immunity ——卓越一班 二组——
Figure 3 The yin and yang of tumour-associated
Figure 5 The mechanism underlying epithelial-to-mesenchymal
Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. doi: /nrrheum
Figure 1 The role of CTLA4 and PD1 in T cell activation
Figure 2 Approaches to improve CAR-T-cell therapy
Figure 2 Effects of imatinib on components of the anticancer immunosurveillance system Figure 2 | Effects of imatinib on components of the anticancer immunosurveillance.
Mechanisms of immune escape in the tumor microenvironment.
Figure 2 Frequency and overlap of alterations
Mechanism of CTLA-4-induced immunosuppression.
Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. doi: /nrendo
Johan Botling, MD, PhD, Martin Sandelin, MD, PhD 
Distribution of TMB and neoantigen load across tumour types.
Figure 3 Tumours secrete factors that cause systemic immunosuppression
Figure 1 Mechanisms of action of immunotherapy modalities
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 Overview of the imaging biomarker roadmap
Mechanism of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway-induced immunosuppression within the tumour microenvironment. Mechanism of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway-induced immunosuppression.
Distribution of immune checkpoint in tumor cells and immune microenvironment. CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4; MHC, major histocompatibility complex;
Releasing the Brakes on Cancer Immunotherapy
Figure 4 Molecular signalling and immunological
(A) Lymph node priming phase: recognition of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) by T-cell receptor (TCR), coactivating CD 28/B7 pathway activation.
Immunological effects of anticancer therapy.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 2 Neoantigen presentation in the tumour microenvironment Figure 2 | Neoantigen presentation in the tumour microenvironment. a | Tumour cells can avoid elimination by immunoediting because of low neoantigen presentation (neoAglow). This occurs as a result of a low level of somatic mutations, or because tumour cells might downregulate antigen processing or presentation. NeoAglow tumours might escape detection by endogenous CTLs early in tumorigenesis, and therefore would expand without the pressure to co-evolve within an immunosuppressive microenvironment. This is the ideal setting for CAR T cells to direct a robust antitumour response. b | Tumours that present a high neoantigen burden (neoAghigh) can be eliminated during the immunoediting process (far right). Alternatively, neoAghigh tumour cells might co-evolve within an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) that mediates avoidance of T-cell surveillance. This setting is the ideal situation for immune-modulating therapies with monoclonal antibodies to direct a robust antitumour response. c | Tumour types can be ranked by their relative presence of somatic mutations209, and this classification can be used to indirectly estimate neoantigen burden. Tumours can be stratified on the basis of somatic mutation prevalence; tumour types with the most robust clinical responses to CAR T-cell therapy (red) or immune modulating mAbs (blue) are stratified by somatic mutation prevalence. ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; CTL, cytotoxic T cell; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; neoAg, neoantigen; PD-1, programmed cell death 1; PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1; TAA, tumour-associated antigen; TAM, tumour-associated macrophage; TCR, T-cell receptor; TIL, tumour infiltrating lymphocyte; TREG, regulatory T cell. Image reproduced from Alexandrov, L. B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415–421 (2013). Khalil, D. N. et al. (2016) The future of cancer treatment: immunomodulation, CARs and combination immunotherapy Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.25