Monarch Butterfly Mariposa Monarca Monarque

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecosystem-based adaptation helps to build the resilience of natural habitat and communities to climate change impacts and thereby reduce their vulnerability.
Advertisements

Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative James Broska Science Coordinator
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
2. Fisheries management and the Ecosystem approach
The CEC North American Regional Action Plan on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment D C McKay.
North American Monarch Conservation Plan (NAMCP) Trinational Monarch Butterfly Monitoring Workshop October 27-29, 2008 Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico Donita.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites ICOMOS Discussion points.
Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans CBD Secretariat April 2011.
IUCN projects to support biodiversity in forests of Central Europe Piotr Tyszko, Ph.D. Project Officer IUCN Office for Central Europe.
The IUCN Programme Nature+ Proposal, May 2011.
Mirna Bojić Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Croatia Budapest, November 2012.
The State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources The Global Plan of Action FAO
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Windhoek, Namibia February 17-18, 2015 GEF 6 Programming Strategic Plan for Biodiversity,
The concept of ecological networks and “green corridors”. Design and implementation. Current status and trends with focus on Europe. Transboundary cooperation.
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION, AND ADAPTATION ASPECTS IN NATIONAL STRATEGIES ON POVERTY REDUCTION (NS- PR), SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SEDP)
Peter Gondo. Session1: INTRODUCTION TO THE NLBI/FOREST INSTRUMENT BACKGROUND AND ORIGIN OF THE NLBI PURPOSE OF THE NLBI G UIDING P RINCIPLES OF THE NLBI.
Building Resilient Marine Protected Areas in Madagascar By Harifidy Ralison 31 January 2008.
Headwaters Communities in Action Building A Better Quality of Life Together.
© GEO Secretariat GEO Ecosystem task and GEO BON Carlos Padovani, Brazil Georgios Sarantakos, GEO Secretariat Beijing, China April 21, 2013 GEO Ecosystem.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Three Countries. One Environment.
ESPON TERRITORIAL TRENDS OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE NATURAL HERITAGE 1Context and objectives 2Facts and Figures 3Physical developments and policy.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
The UNEP/CMS Secretariat North America Officer in Washington DC, USA (shared with UNEP/RONA) Purpose: Raise Awareness & Understanding of CMS; Build Political.
Decision Making Climate Change and Biodiversity in South African Protected Areas AIACC Regional Workshop Dakar.
North American Marine Protected Areas Network Commission for environmental cooperation Biodiversity Conservation Working Group CEC Council Session - 24.
Where and how can REDD+ deliver most benefits? Lera Miles, UNEP-WCMC 7 December 2015.
Kyrgyzstan & UNFCCC. Adaptation to Climate Change: Strategies & Priorities Zukhra Abaikhanova, Center for Climate Change Workshop The 2 nd Meeting of Working.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Report on Accomplishments Overview: CEC Operational Plan Evan Lloyd CEC Executive Director 22 June 2011 Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
Biodiversity Collaborative Draft Framework For Working Together.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
International Union for Conservation of Nature Conserving biodiversity Pioneering nature’s solutions to global challenges.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation Adrián Vázquez – Executive Director Measuring Results The CEC’s Strategic Plan: An Interim Report on.
Marrakech Task Force on Sustainable Tourism Development 3 rd Task Force meeting Paris December 2007 Marrakech Task Force on Sustainable Tourism Development.
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
and to Climate Action SDG 13 and Life on Land, SDG 15
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
Element of Targets Priority Targets Quantitative Aspects
Energy and Sustainability Science: What have we learned. William C
Peacebuilding Priority Plan Heads of Mission
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and implications for South Africa
Addressing threats from noncompliant imports entering North America
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Sustainable Fisheries in the Black Sea European Committee of the Regions 7 June 2017, Brussels Sustainability of Black Sea fisheries and tools for fisheries.
Developing an Integrated
EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring
Spring 2017.
National Environment Policy Presentation
Species at Risk (SAR) Legislation & Program Renewal Project
Protecting Marine Ecosystems
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Welcome to the 2nd Mediterranean Natura 2000 Seminar Limassol, Cyprus November 2017 A milestone event of the Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process.
CHAPTER 38 Conservation Biology
Objectives, Scope and Structure of Country Reports
Report on Accomplishments Overview: CEC Operational Plan
Enhancing North American Air Quality Management
ESTABLISHING CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR NATURA 2000 SITES
SUSTAINABLE TOURISM HANDBOOK FOR EASTERN AFRICA: Aims and objectives
Addressing Pollinator Health and Extension’s Role
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
(Country) Socio-economic importance of bushmeat
United Nations Environment Programme
What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Presentation transcript:

Monarch Butterfly Mariposa Monarca Monarque North American Monarch Conservation Plan (NAMCP) CEC Council Session 26 June 2008

Where are we coming from IUCN declared the monarch migration an endangered phenomenon in 1983 Breeding habitat loss and degradation in Canada and the US as a result of changing agricultural practices and the development of agricultural lands and open spaces Wintering habitat loss and degradation in Mexico: Loss of forested land in the region of the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve from 1986 to 2006 Climate change: changes in temperature and precipitation will render overwintering sites unsuitable and breeding habitats are predicted to shift northward The monarch’s dependence on a wide range of habitats throughout the flyway calls for trinational cooperation During this slide, the presenter will explain why people care so much about this species. He or she will highlight the monarch’s complex life cycle, its phenomenal migration and interaction within the complex societies of the three countries, and its importance as a flagship species for trinational cooperation.

Where we are now The vision: Healthy monarch flyway and healthy monarch communities The instrument: A North American Monarch Conservation Plan Setting priorities: A continental map of threats, their intensity and trends Measuring success: Common guidelines to monitor monarch populations and habitats throughout the flyway In 2007, the CEC was instructed by Council to support the existing multi-stakeholder, collaborative effort to develop a comprehensive multi-party approach to maintain healthy monarch populations and habitats throughout the flyway, supported by a trilateral monarch butterfly sister sites network. Eight months after this direction, the Secretariat delivered the North American Monarch butterfly Conservation Plan (NAMCP), a consensus-based, multi-stakeholder strategy to protect the monarch butterfly, a strategy that addresses the multiple threats throughout the flyway while promoting sustainable local livelihoods.

NAMCP objectives Decrease or eliminate deforestation due to unsustainable logging and habitat conversion in the overwintering region Address threats of habitat loss and degradation in the flyway Address threats of loss, fragmentation and modification of breeding habitat Develop innovative approaches to bring economic benefits to local communities while protecting monarch habitat Develop and expand a North America-wide monitoring network to assess the condition of the monarch, its habitats and the impact of conservation actions The initiative to prepare a NAMCP was launched at the December 2006 Monarch Flyway Conservation Workshop in Mission, Texas, and subsequently endorsed by the Trilateral Committee and Biodiversity Conservation Working Group in May 2007 in Quebec City, Quebec. In June 2007, recognizing the need for an integrated strategy to address conservation in all three countries, the CEC Council, through Resolution 07-09, instructed the Secretariat to support the multi-stakeholder, collaborative NAMCP effort. The Plan acknowledges the need for additional ecological and socio-economic information to better protect the monarch butterfly and its habitats, while supporting local socio-economic development. The NAMCP provides an updated account of the species and its current situation, identifies the main causes of loss or decline and puts in perspective the ensuing current management actions taken in each country, as well as public perception of the species. Against this background, the Plan offers a list of key trinational collaborative conservation actions to be implemented, in particular, through a network of sister monarch sites.

An updated version of this animation will be available next Friday, June 6. This slide will –through, a google-map animation show the strategic importance of the sister-sites network. It will show “key” monarch aggregation sites by states and ecoregions, will overlay highly vulnerable areas due to threat intensity and trend, concluding with the pinpointing of places that maximizes the conservation efforts though the establishment of the sister-sites network A Journey North