SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Keeping an Eye on Your World Economic Slide Library … Will grow continuously as updates continue to get added.
Advertisements

1 Update on Bicyclist & Pedestrian Data Collection and Modeling Efforts Transportation Research Board January 2010 Charlie Denney, Associate Michael Jones,
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PART I: CONTEXT, CONCEPTS AND CHARACTERIZATI ON.
Regional Routing Model Review: C) Model Formulation and Scenario Analysis Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
21 st Century Task Force Recommendation Go OHIO Transportation Futures Plan will deliver a detailed blueprint for transforming Ohios vast road, rail,
ZMQS ZMQS
Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Iran Network and Transit Modeling and Forecasting Using EMME/2 Mahboobeh Zakeri Sohi ENTRAConsultants 21st International EMME Users Conference October,
ABC Technology Project
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Traffic assignment.
Model City 2011: 22 nd International Emme Users Conference.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
July 22, Model Objectives Forecast ADT on the Rural State Highway System Autos & Trucks Autos & Trucks Arterial System Arterial System Complement,
GIS and Transportation Planning
Prepared for: The 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, Iowa Department.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Truck Model for Memphis 2015 Transportation.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Model Training Workshop Florida Statewide Model Systems Planning Office Florida Department of Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Development of a Hybrid Freight Model from Truck Travel.
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
Trip Generation Review and Recommendations 1 presented to MTF Model Advancement Committee presented by Ken Kaltenbach The Corradino Group November 9, 2009.
ODOT Freight Modeling Presented to the Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, OH September 18, 2007 By Gregory Giaimo, PE Ohio Department of Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by California Statewide Travel Demand Model California State Transportation Plan Policy.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
FAF2 Data Disaggregation Methodology and Results presented to Model Task Force presented by Vidya Mysore, Florida DOT Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics,
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Ohio Statewide Model Passenger Transit Calibration Pat Costinett Greg Erhardt Rebekah Anderson.
FSUTMS Model Status and Standardization Florida Model Task Force Meeting Tampa, FL December 13, 2006 Developments and Future Directions.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
National Modeling TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
Trip Distribution Review and Recommendations
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Design of Florida’s Turnpike’s State Integrated Land-Use Travel Demand Model Thomas Adler Resource Systems Group Youssef Dehghani Parsons Brinckerhoff,
Presentation transcript:

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office The Integrated Florida Statewide Model Presented to SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Presented by Yongqiang Wu FDOT Systems Planning Office February 08, 208

Content Model Structure/Implementation Model Calibration/Validation Model Applications Future Enhancements

Model Structure Highway Network Passenger Model Freight Model Trip Generation Trip Distribution Auto Occupancy Freight Model Trip Generation Trip Distribution Mode Choice Joint Assignment

Integrated Modeling Process Tonnage Generation by Commodity Group Tonnage Distribution by Commodity Group Tonnage Mode Choice (Tons to Trucks Conversion) Freight Trucks Non-Freight Trucks QRFM Trip Generation by Truck Class QRFM Trip Distribution by Truck Class Heavy Truck Trip Table Medium Truck Trip Table Light Truck Trip Table Statewide Zonal Socioeconomic Data Auto Trip Generation for Non-MPO Zones Auto Trip Generation from MPO Models Auto Vehicle Trip Distribution Statewide Highway Network Skims Statewide Highway Network Auto Occupancy Model Long Distance Trip Module Volume/Speed by Vehicle Class Passenger Model Freight Model Freight Truck Trip Table Long Dist. Business Trip Table FL Res LD Tourist Trip Table FL-US / FL-CAN Trip Table Short Dist. Ext-Int Trip Table Urban & Rural Auto Trip Table Multi-User-Class Equilibrium Assignment Input Process Output Legend

Cube Voyager Implementation

User Interface

User Interface (Cont’d)

Highway Network – In-State In-State: 87,853 Links

Highway Network – Out-of-State In-State: 87,853 Links Out-of-State: 2,914 Links Total: 90,767 Links

TAZ Structure - Internal Urban: 3,529 Zones Rural: 358 Zones

TAZ Structure – Ext. Stations Urban: 3,529 Zones Rural: 358 Zones External: 94 Stations Total: 4,008 Zones

Passenger Trips Short Distance Trips Long Distance Trips Trip distance <= 40 miles Long Distance Trips Trip distance > 40 miles

Passenger Trip Purposes Short Distance Trips Home-Based Work Home-Based Shopping Home-Based Social-Recreational Home-Based Other Non-Home Based External – Internal (EI)

Passenger Trip Purposes Long Distance Trips Long Distance Business Trips US Visitors to Florida Florida Visitors to US Canadian Visitors to Florida Florida Instate Tourists Data Sources for Long Distance Trips National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) American Travel Survey (ATS) Florida Visitors Study

Separate Programs for Freight and Non-Freight Trips Freight Trips Truck Trips Separate Programs for Freight and Non-Freight Trips Freight Trips 14 commodity groups (trip purposes) Tonnages of commodities (trip ends) function of employment & population

Commodity Groups Fourteen Groups Agriculture Non-Metallic Minerals Coal Food Non-Durable Manufacturing Goods Lumber Chemicals Paper Petroleum Products Other Durable Manufacturing Goods Clay, Concrete and Glass Waste Miscellaneous Freight Warehouse

Allocate by Commodity Group Assume 306 Working Days per Year Freight Modes Five Modes Truck Intermodal Rail Carload Rail Air Water Allocate by Commodity Group Assume 306 Working Days per Year

Non-Freight Truck Trips Quick Response Freight Manual (QRFM) Method Function of Employment & Household Three Truck Types Light trucks (four-tired vehicles) Medium trucks (single unit trucks with 6+ tires) Heavy trucks (combination trucks)

Trucks are Converted to Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) Joint Trip Assignment Trucks are Converted to Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) Multi-User-Class Equilibrium Trip Assignment Long distance auto and heavy trucks are assigned to highway path based on free flow travel times Short distance auto, medium- and light-trucks are assigned to highway path base on congested travel times

Joint Trip Assignment Post Processing Change attribute names to make the output more readable Convert PCEs back to number of trucks Calculate aggregate statistics

Model Calibration/Validation Validated to Year 2000 Conditions Three Levels of Validation System-wide Achieve reasonable results statewide District-wide Adjustment of parameters specific to districts Corridor level Focus on major statewide corridors

Model Applications Statewide Long- and Mid- Range Transportation Planning Studies Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Implementation Analysis Corridor Analysis Freight Movements Analysis Freight Mode Shift Impacts Source of External Forecasts for Urban and Regional Models

Model Enhancements Development of GIS Based Network More Compatible TAZ Structure Uniform Passenger Trip Generation Model Review/Revise Freight Model Update Long Distance and Tourist Trip Tables Validate to 2005 Conditions

How to Get the FLSWM?

Thank You ! Questions?