School Leadership Team Conference: HQS 3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
Benchmark assessment data generated from the Edusoft Assessment Management System is a powerful tool for informing classroom instruction, and ensuring.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
HQS 2 School Leadership Glenna Heinlein and Kathy Hypes October 1, 2013.
Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
CCISD TECHNOLOGY PLAN by Patti Shields Cohort 10 EDLD 5362 Information Systems Management.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
\\ovec-ofc-dc2\OVEC Share\PBLClass-video. Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing ISLN October 17, 2014.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, February 2014 NTI.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 1 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Developing Leaders in Effective Teaching Diane J. Briars President National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2015 NCTM Minneapolis Regional.
QTC Tel: : Yan Li QTC Tel: : Student-Centred Learning The Challenge of Change.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules
What is Differentiated Instruction? Differentiated instruction is the theory that allows teachers to face this challenge by taking diverse student factors.
The Teacher- Child Interaction Linking Developmentally Appropriate Practices to the Characteristics of Effective Instruction.
\\ovec-ofc-dc2\OVEC Share\PBLClass-video. Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing ISLN October 17, 2014.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
+ Minding the Gap: Data-Based Problem Solving Summer Leadership Conference August 2016.
Middle Years Programme (MYP)
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
What: Determine the utility of Thinking Routines to pursue our goal of increasing student understanding. Why: An apparent lack of thinking on the part.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
Differentiation in the 21st Century
Making thinking Visible
Promoting Reflective Practice Local District 6 February 18, 2005
Collaborative Leadership
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Big Ideas and Problem Solving
Georgia Department of Education
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
February 21-22, 2018.
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
School Leadership Team Conference
Presentation transcript:

School Leadership Team Conference: HQS 3 Nancy Cline and Leatha Williams October 1, 2013

Why the West Virginia Standards for High Quality Schools? These standards describe the seven common standards expected of schools to ensure a high quality education, in an engaging learning environment. The policy represents a coherent and aligned set of expectations necessary to transform schools into outcome focused, innovative, accountable learning organizations that can prepare all students to be contributing citizens for the global, digital age of the 21st century.

Standard 3: Provides a Standards-Focused Curriculum with Engaging Instruction and a Balanced System of Assessment Each school team will develop a non-content specific school improvement goal and plan specifically for instruction based on the 3rd WV Standard for High Quality Schools, diagnostic observations and recommendations that they will take back to their school to implement as measured by their school wide plan.

Objectives All SLTs will reflect and rate their school on highly effective practices in HQS 3. All SLTs will compare and contrast their school’s diagnostic with the high quality practices in HQS 3. All SLTs will prioritize the needs as identified from the SLT discussions on HQS 3 and the school diagnostic. All SLTs will write goals for their Strategic Plan. All SLTs will specify what evidence will be used to measure successful completion of their school improvement goals.

Strategic and Specific What exactly is to be accomplished? Measurable How will one know when goal is accomplished? Attainable Is there sufficient time to accomplish the goal? Results-Oriented Does it align to the HQS and/or the Diagnostic recommendations? Time-bound When will one achieve this goal? When will one undertake activities to achieve our goal? SMART GOAL COMPONENTS

Discussions and Protocols Visible Thinking Strategies

Think-Pair-Square-Share This is an active reasoning routine that promotes understanding of multiple perspectives and evidence. Strategy Highlights: 1. Posing a question, idea or topic 2. Asking student to come to an individual understanding 3. Allow thinking time to form an opinion/answer 4. Discussion and consensus at all levels 5. Congress or reporting out

Connect Extend Challenge This is a visible thinking routine, which allows students to connect new ideas to prior knowledge. Strategy Highlights: Encourages high order thinking for students It acts as a formative assessment (informative assessment) for the teacher It encourages the students to have ownership of their learning because the take stock in ongoing questions, concepts that are puzzling or difficult as they reflect on their own thinking.

Activity 1 Utilizing the HQS and the Diagnostic

Activity 1: Connect Extend Challenge School Diagnostic Report 15-minutes Think Pair Share How are the ideas and information presented CONNECTED to what you already knew? Extend What new ideas did you get that EXTENDED or pushed your thinking in new directions? Challenge What is still CHALLENGING or confusing for you to get your mind around? What questions, wonderings or puzzles do you now have?

Activity 2: Vision It is one year from right now and you are looking back at the school year, HQS 3, the Diagnostic and the challenges. Describe what ways your school is different and what is the evidence based on the HQS 3 and the Diagnostic recommendations? Question: Where do we want to be?

School Wide Improvement: Goal As a school leadership team go back through the HQS Rubric and Diagnostic and identify 2 to 3 items that will address the barriers as well as help the school accomplish the vision for a year from now. Each team should come to consensus on the items. Question: How will we get there?

Diagnostic Observation There was no process school wide for opening and closing class procedures. There is no protocol school wide for student conversations such as think-pair-square-share. The majority of the classrooms were traditional in nature and mostly teacher centered. Teachers were observed utilizing a variety of teaching strategies in limited capacity. However most of the strategies were reported as lower level thinking strategies and not learner-centered.

Example 1: Putting It Together HQS3 Observations 3.B. 1: All teachers align curriculum, instruction, and assessment to Next Generation Standards. 3.C.3: All teachers plan lessons that actively engage students, involve varied grouping patterns and promote student interaction. Teachers reported that several had been trained on the Instructional Practices Inventory; however the process has yet to be utilized at the school. Both administrator when asked about the greatest challenge facing their school responded instructional leadership and changing instructional practices.

School Goal Example 1 During the 2013-2014 school year, Team USA School will increase the time students are engaged in “active” learning by 10%.

Example 2: Putting It Together HQS3 Observations

School Goal Example 2

Goal Writing Framing Statement During the 2013-2014 school year, __________ School will increase ____________ by ______%