General Rank Order Rules

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing a Title I Budget Title I Directors Budget Workshop June 14, 2011 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV.
Advertisements

New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Title I Site Eligibility Ranking & Serving Schools NCLB Technical Assistance Audio March 28, :30 PM March 29, :30 AM Alaska Department of.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Title I and Homeless Education: A Winning Team
Community Eligibility Provision and Title I Funding June 2015.
Selecting Title I Schools and Allocating Funds June 2014.
Community Eligibility Provision February 20, 25, 26, and March 10, 2014.
Title IA Eligible Attendance Areas Title IA Online Training
Section 1113 of NCLB, Title I Eligible School Attendance Areas (Does not apply to LEAs with fewer than 1,000 children)
Calculating Your Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE )….. General Selection Requirements 1.An LEA must rank all of its schools (from which the LEA draws its children)
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Title I – Part A Requirements North Carolina
ESEA Directors Institute 2014ESEA Directors Institute 2014 Title I Schools – Select / Rank / Serve.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
1 Determining Title IA School Allocations Title IA Online Training
1 Virginia Department of Education Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Community Eligibility Provision, Title I and Accountability Bridgette Hires and Elena Sanders, 10/2/2014.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Presented by the MDE Office of Child Nutrition (OCN) & Office of Federal Programs (OFP)
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds June 2015.
Consolidated Funding ApplicationConsolidated Funding Application ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 6-9, 2014October 6-9, 2014.
Supplemental Educational Services. Determining Per Student SES Rate Section 1116(e)(6): each SES student must get lesser of: a.District’s total Title.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Office of Child Nutrition.
Developing a Title I Budget Title I Directors Budget and Planning Workshop June 18, 2012 Embassy Suites.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
Title I, Part A Program Title I, Part A provides educational services to schools with high percentages of children from low-income families by providing.
Davis School District Title I Presentation Title I Presentation
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
Community Eligibility Option (CEO) and Title I Update Suzette Cook Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs West Virginia Department of Education.
1.  Understand ESEA and the purpose of Title I, Part A Programs and Services  Understand how to communicate and plan with private schools  Understand.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Presented by the MDE Office of Child Nutrition (OCN) Scott Clements, Director.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Comprehensive Continuous Improvement Plan(CCIP) Training Module 5 Title I Pages.
Timeline to a Successful Implementation of the Community Eligibility Provision.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Eligible Attendance Areas and the Impact of the Community Eligibility.
2016 Allison Yarboro Federal Program Monitoring and Support Eligible School Summary Report (ESSR) Power School Data Webinar.
Title I: Ranking, Serving, and Allocating Funds to Schools 2016 ESEA Directors Institute August 23, 2016.
PAPFC Annual Conference May 3-6, 2015 Presented By: Cindy Rhoads Division of Federal Programs Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Community Eligibility Provision and Title I
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Community Eligibility Provision
What you need to know About Title I
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
Title I and Prekindergarten
Federal Programs Overview (Title I and Community Eligibility)
Title I A Comparability Report
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
Community Eligibility Provision
13th Annual Title Programs Conference June , 2015
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
Title I in the FY19 ESSA Consolidated Grant Application
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP)
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
What is a Title I School? Schools qualifying for Title I Federal funds are schools with free and reduced populations of 75% or greater, and these schools.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Community Eligibility Provision and Title I
AYP and Report Card.
DFP Allocations: Understanding My Award Amount
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
Presentation transcript:

General Rank Order Rules 11/14/2018 General Rank Order Rules LEA may only serve schools where funds are sufficient to enable children to make adequate progress toward meeting the State’s performance standards Districts with fewer than 1,000 students or who have only one school per grade span are exempt from rank order rules All other LEAs All schools above 75% poverty level must be served before any schools below 75% poverty level are served, regardless of grade span Using “Free Lunch” instead of “Free and Reduced Meal” will often allow an LEA to focus Title I funds on fewer schools or particular grade spans Typically choosing Free Lunch will decrease the number of schools affected by the 75% rule. 1

11/14/2018 35% Rule District Wide Only schools above 35% poverty rate may be served Schools must be served in rank order regardless of grade span If district-wide poverty rate is above 35%, “Percentages District Wide” will allow LEA to set a higher minimum poverty rate for serving schools: In the first example, the LEA could serve schools down to 35%. In the second example, using Percentages District Wide increases the minimum poverty level served to 59%. In the third example, the minimum poverty level served is 89%, which is more restrictive than the 75% rule. 2

11/14/2018 35% Rule District Wide If district-wide poverty rate is below 35%, “Percentages District Wide will allow district to serve schools below 35% (note: If an LEA serves any schools below 35% poverty, the LEA must allocate to all participating schools an amount for each low-income child in each school that is at least 125% of the LEA’s allocation per low-income child.) From Guidance: If an LEA serves any areas or schools below 35 percent poverty, the LEA must allocate to all its participating areas or schools an amount for each low-income child in each participating school attendance area or school that is at least 125 percent of the LEA's allocation per low-income child.   An LEA must allocate at least this amount for each low-income child in every school the LEA serves, not just for those schools below 35 percent poverty. 3

Grade Span Grouping + District Wide Percentage 11/14/2018 Grade Span Grouping + District Wide Percentage Any school above 75% must be served – Grade Span Grouping is then used to select which of remaining schools to serve. Only schools above the district-wide poverty rate AND within the prioritized grade span(s) may be served. 4

Grade Span Grouping + Group Wide Percentage Any school above 75% must be served – Grade Span Grouping is then used to select which of remaining schools to serve. Only schools above the grade span poverty rate AND within the prioritized grade span(s) may be served Schools must be served in rank order within the grade span 5

Grade Span Grouping + 35% Rule Any school above 75% must be served – Grade Span Grouping is then used to select which of remaining schools to serve. Only schools above the district-wide poverty rate AND above 35% may be served. 6