Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.

Advertisements

Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.

CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Citizens Advisory Committee December 6, 2013 Meeting Rich Batiuk,

CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Progress to Date and Forthcoming Issues CBP Management Board Briefing May 9, 2012 Meeting.

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.

1 Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014 Issues Resolution Committee: Recommendations to PSC on Key Issues Raised during the Public/Partner Comment Period.

1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.

Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.

District of Columbia Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Blue Plains Regional Committee 1 District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Divsion.

Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.

Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.

2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.

Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.

Moving towards a restored Chesapeake Bay watershed

OVERVIEW: CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS AND WATER & CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Water Resources Technical Committee Oct. 29, 2015 Presented by Tanya.

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.

Carin Bisland, EPA Principals’ Staff Committee 5/14/12.

Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017

Chesapeake bay program: Funding & Bay TMDL Midpoint Assessment

Environmental Literacy

Chesapeake bay program

Jim Edward, Deputy Director – EPA/CBPO

CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule

DEP Citizen Advisory Committee October 17, 2017

State Profile Maryland

Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans

Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems

2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections

Watershed Implementation Plan

Methodology to Distribute Target Loads

State Profile Delaware

Appendix C New Administration General Assembly Session

Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP

State Profile Pennsylvania

Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014

State Profile New York.

FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources

2018 Chesapeake Executive Council Planning Team PowerPoint

Conowingo Dam Update Presented to the Citizens Advisory Committee

State Profile West Virginia

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System

2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.

Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs

Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters

What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?

Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond

Communicating the Midpoint Assessment and Phase III WIPs

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment

Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters

CBP Citizen Advisory Committee Briefing February 22, 2013 Meeting

Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.

James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager

Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2

Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0

CBP Principals’ Staff Committee Briefing May 14, 2012 Meeting

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Architecture

Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL

Citizen Advisory Committee November 30, 2018

Citizens Advisory Committee Discussion & Program Update Dana Aunkst Director USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 22,2019 Baltimore, MD.

Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay

2018 BMP Verification Assessment

Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.

VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan

Presentation transcript:

Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017 Reaching Consensus on Midpoint Assessment Policy Decisions Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017

Today’s Requested Policy Decisions Approval of the approach to account for the additional loads delivered to the Bay due to the Conowingo infill Approval of how to factor climate change into the Phase III WIPs Approval of the draft Phase III Planning Targets as the starting point for the 4-month review process

Today’s Meeting Flow Specific language for each decision will be presented to the PSC PSC approved modifications to the decision language made in real time PSC will be asked to approve Recommended public communication messages for each decision Specific language to be inserted into the final Phase III WIP expectations document to reflect growth, Conowingo infill, and climate change decisions

Conowingo Dam Infill

Today’s Requested Policy Decision Approval of the WQGIT-proposed approach to account for the additional nutrient loads delivered to the Bay due to the Conowingo infill www.chesapeakebay.net

Today’s Requested Policy Decision Approval of the timeframe by which the jurisdictions have to address the additional nutrient loads www.chesapeakebay.net

Key Issues & Questions Addressed From Day One

PSC Policy Decisions

PSC Public Communication Messages

Climate Change Impacts

Today’s Requested Policy Decisions Approval of the WQGIT-proposed dual approach to factor climate change into the Phase III WIPs

Today’s Requested Policy Decisions Approval of WQGIT recommendation to provide flexibility among jurisdictions and a commitment for CBP programmatic support (e.g., guidance, data, funding, etc.) for implementation of climate change policies that exceed the Partnership approved policies

Key Issues & Questions Addressed From Day One

PSC Policy Decisions

PSC Public Communication Messages

Draft Phase III Planning Targets

Today’s Requested Policy Decision Approval of the draft Phase III Planning Targets as the starting point for the Partnership’s 4-month review process

Proposed Draft Phase III Planning Targets: Nitrogen Jurisdiction 1985 Baseline 2013 Progress Phase III Planning Target NY 18.71 15.44 10.59 PA 122.41 99.28 73.18 MD 83.56 55.89 45.30 WV 8.73 8.06 6.35 DC 6.48 1.75 2.43 DE 6.97 6.59 4.59 VA 84.29 61.53 55.82 Basinwide 331.15 248.54 198.25 *Units: millions of pounds

Proposed Draft Phase III Planning Targets: Phosphorus Jurisdiction 1985 Baseline 2013 Progress Phase III Planning Target NY 1.198 0.710 0.506 PA 6.115 3.696 3.073 MD 7.419 3.919 3.604 WV 0.793 0.560 0.456 DC 0.090 0.062 0.130 DE 0.225 0.115 0.120 VA 13.545 6.345 6.186 Basinwide 29.384 15.408 14.073 *Units: millions of pounds

Key Issues & Questions Addressed From Day One

PSC Policy Decision

PSC Public Communication Messages

EPA’s Phase III WIP Expectations Accounting for Growth:

EPA’s Phase III WIP Expectations Conowingo Dam infill:

EPA’s Phase III WIP Expectations Climate Change: