VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mid-term Review.
Advertisements

Strengthening the Judicial Branch SOL: VUS.5e.  Born in Midland, Virginia  Veteran of the Revolutionary War.  He endured the harsh winter at.
Today Students Will: Participate in role play activities and create a flow chart to depict the details and significance of the following Supreme Court.
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
John Marshall, Chief Justice
SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.
Judicial Review Power of the Courts. Judiciary Act of 1789 George Washington George Washington Created the Federal Court System and outlined the powers.
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)
The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?
JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.
DO NOW: “We are under a Constitution. But the Constitution is only what the Supreme Court says it is. It is these judges that safeguard our liberty, protect.
Courts The point of the courts is to provide a place where we can argue about matters relating to the law. The point of lawyers is to help people argue.
John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 
Thomas Jefferson. Election of 1800  Thomas Jefferson- Democratic- Republican  Supported by poor farmers  Favored Popular Democracy & States’ Rights.
The History of the Supreme Court HUSH Unit Three.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History.
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION Topic 3: The Marshall Court (Judicial Nationalism)
The Marshall Court.
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835.
Alek Henningsgard.  Maryland  James W. McCulloch  Second bank of the United States.
The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.
Review for Test Constitutional Convention New Jersey vs. Virginia Plan Great Compromise 3/5 Compromise Preamble of Constitution Article 1- Legislative.
Eliseo Lugo III.  Explain the importance of Marbury versus Madison.  Describe how the United States Supreme Court gained the power of Judicial Review.
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution The U.S.S.C. interprets the Constitution and the Law How did the Supreme Court under.
© 2004 Plano ISD, Plano, TX Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.
The Emergence of the Supreme Court The Marshall Court
UNITED STATES HISTORY AND THE CONSTITUTION
Supreme Court USHC-1.7.
Judicial Review Power of the Courts.
Implied Powers of the National Government
Supreme Court Cases Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION
Supreme Court USHC-1.7.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
Congress President Supreme Court.
Establishing Judicial Review
The New Government – The Constitution of the United States
The Federalist Judiciary
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
Marbury v. Madison.
Expanding the powers of the Judicial Branch
Important Supreme Court Cases in America History
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution
How did John Marshall’s decisions strengthen the power of the federal government?
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION
Reviewing Marshall Court Decisions
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
Why was the case “Marbury vs. Madison” significant?
Judicial review!.
October 25, 2018 U.S. History Agenda: DO NOW: Term Matching
Growth of the Supreme Court
Marbury v. Madison.
The Federalists in Power and the Emergence of a Two-Party System
John Marshall Court US History.
Establishing Judicial Review
Defining the Powers of the National Government
What impact did John Marshall have on the U.S.?
The power of Judicial Review
Marbury v. Madison Issue: Marbury sued over a judgeship promised him by an outgoing president. Ruling: Established the principal of Judicial Review; strengthening.
Supreme Court Cases of the early Republic
James Monroe th President.
The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution
(Warm-Up 12-6) Which Supreme Court case set up the principle of judicial review? Gibbons v Ogden Marbury v Madison McCulloch v Maryland Engel v Vitale.
Do Now (Background Essay)
Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?
How is power distributed in Federalism?
Day #5 Supreme Court Cases
Struggle for Ratification of the U.S. Constitution
Presentation transcript:

VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the other branches of government?

Important legal precedents established by the Marshall Court strengthened the role of the U.S. Supreme Court as an equal branch of the national government.

Marbury v Madison (1803): Established the doctrine of Judicial Review The first time the court declared a law or act of government unconstitutional This secured judicial review as a powerful tool for checks and balances. In this case, Marbury sued Madison for an appointment as a federal judge. It was the first time the court declared a law “unconstitutional”.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) This established the doctrine of implied powers for the federal government – the formation of the National Bank. Powers that seem “necessary and proper” as related to specific powers granted in the Constitution are supported. Specifically in this case, the different levels of government are not permitted to tax the other levels of government.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) The court ruled on interstate commerce. Established the court’s authority to mediate disagreements between branches of government, levels of government, and competing business interests. This case involved competing claims of rival steam ship companies on the Hudson River.

The decisions of the John Marshall Court helped to strengthen the power of the national government, while defining the judiciary as an equal branch!