The Anatomy of a Scientific Article: IMRAD format

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Protocol Development.
HOW TO WRITE AN ACADEMIC PAPER
Dr Ronni Michelle Greenwood Autumn  Introduction  Method  Results  Discussion.
Anatomy Laboratory Write up Emulate standard Scientific Paper (few exceptions)
Writing for Publication
Writing an original research paper Part one: Important considerations
The material was supported by an educational grant from Ferring How to Write a Scientific Article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Scientific writing A.H. Mehrparvar Occupational Medicine Department.
Evaluating a Scientific Paper. Organization 1.Title 2. Summary or Abstract 4. Material and Methods 5. Results 6. Discussion and Conclusions 7. Bibliography.
Topics - Reading a Research Article Brief Overview: Purpose and Process of Empirical Research Standard Format of Research Articles Evaluating/Critiquing.
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPORSAL
Left click or use the forward arrows to advance through the PowerPoint Upon clicking, each section of the article will be highlighted one by one Read.
Anatomy of a Manuscript How to write a manuscript in 19 sentences
Writing a Research Proposal
How to Critically Review an Article
EMPRICAL RESEARCH REPORTS
Research Report Chapter 15. Research Report – APA Format Title Page Running head – BRIEF TITLE, positioned in upper left corner of no more than 50 characters.
Formulating a Research Proposal
Methodology Describe Context & setting Design Participants Sampling Power Analysi s Interventions Outcome (study variables) Data Collection Procedures.
Scientific Writing Fred Tudiver, MD Karen Smith, MA Ivy Click, MA Amelia Nichols, MS.
Systematic Reviews.
ABSTRACT Function: An abstract is a summary of the entire work that helps readers to decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper. (HINT…write.
Structure of a Manuscript Microdis Annual Meeting Brussels- Feb
Report Format and Scientific Writing. What is Scientific Writing? Clear, simple, well ordered No embellishments, not an English paper Written for appropriate.
Title and Abstract Description of paper Summarize the paper.
How to read a scientific paper
Critical Appraisal of the Scientific Literature
Literature Review. Outline of the lesson Learning objective Definition Components of literature review Elements of LR Citation in the text Learning Activity.
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
The Discussion Section. 2 Overall Purpose : To interpret your results and justify your interpretation The Discussion.
How to write a manuscript and get it published in European Urology Common problems and potential solutions Giacomo Novara, M.D., F.E.B.U. Assistant professor.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Writing a literature review, Stewart McKinney,2008.
Title Page The title page is the first page of your psychology paper. In order to make a good first impression, it is important to have a well-formatted.
BY DR. HAMZA ABDULGHANI MBBS,DPHC,ABFM,FRCGP (UK), Diploma MedED(UK) Associate Professor DEPT. OF MEDICAL EDUCATION COLLEGE OF MEDICINE June 2012 Writing.
WRITING THE DISSERTATION. DR. S. YOHANNA REVISION COURSE.
The Final Report.  Once scientists arrive at conclusions, they need to communicate their findings to others.  In most cases, scientists report the results.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
How to Read a Journal Article. Basics Always question: – Does this apply to my clinical practice? – Will this change how I treat patients? – How could.
Paper Writing and Abstract Writing Prof. Peih-ying Lu School of Medicine Kaohsiung Medical University.
Source: S. Unchern,  Research is not been completed until the results have been published.  “You don’t write because you want to say something,
Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.
Writing a sound proposal
Writing Scientific Research Paper
Research Skills.
The Scholarly Journal Article
How to Write a Laboratory Report.
Components of thesis.
Writing the research protocol
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
The Anatomy of a Scientific Article: IMRAD format
Your title Abstract Introduction: Background/Context Methods
Title should accurately and succinctly describe study
How to Write a Laboratory Report.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (optional section)
Title should accurately and succinctly describe study
Your name Your faculty mentor’s name Department
What the Editors want to see!
Managerial Decision Making and Evaluating Research
Poster Title ___ Title is at top of the poster, short, descriptive of the project and easily readable at a distance of about 4-5 feet (words about
Roya Kelishadi,MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Dec18,2018.
Your name Your faculty mentor’s name Department
How to Write a Laboratory Report.
Presentation transcript:

The Anatomy of a Scientific Article: IMRAD format Mwachaka

INTRODUCTION What we know What we don’t know What we need to find out Limit to only pertinent references What we don’t know What we need to find out Primary and secondary research objectives Preplanned subgroup analyses

Number of paragraphs per section: Introduction - 2 Methods - 7 Results - 7 Discussion - 6

INTRODUCTION ESTABLISH what gaps exist in knowledge, that this new research will answer Most authors follow one of a few approaches to the INTRODUCTION: The SEMINAR approach The ALARMIST approach The MUCH DISCUSSED RECENTLY (MDR) approach

METHODS section ANSWERS THE QUESTION, 'What did you do?' Describes the methods that you used. explicit, open to criticism, and reproducible by other investigators. enough detail to enable your readers to: judge whether the methods were appropriate for answering the study question judge any weaknesses in methodology that could influence the interpretation of the results repeat the study if they wish to do so.

METHODS Participant selection Variables and procedures for each primary and secondary objective Analytic methods Study design – Case report/series/Review/RCT/Meta-analysis etc Subject selection Source population Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Rationale for inclusion/exclusion criteria

RESULTS section Should give a factual account of what was found: the recruitment of study participants, the description of the study population the main results and ancillary analyses. Should be free of interpretations and discursive text reflecting the authors’ views and opinions.

RESULTS Decisions in presenting the results stem from the following questions: which data should be presented (and which omitted)?; in what sequence should the data be presented?; and what should be stated in the text vs tables and figures? In general, the most important results should be shown first, the least important last.

Tables and Figures Purpose May aim for about 3-4 total Concise display of information Provide several levels of detail Reduces length of text May aim for about 3-4 total Table 1: Patient characteristics Table 2-4: one for each research objective

Results NOT all data collected may need to be reported. Present your results in logical sequence in the text, tables, and illustrations. Do not repeat in the text all data in the tables or illustrations; emphasize or summarize only important observations.

DISCUSSION a brief synopsis of the key findings; consideration of possible mechanisms and explanations; comparison with relevant findings from other published studies limitations of the study; and implications of the work for practice and research.

Summary Introduction Methods Results Discussion What we know What we don’t know. What we did to find out Methods Participant selection Variables and procedures for each primary and secondary objective Analytic methods Results Patient recruitment and characteristics Evidence for first objective Evidence for second objective Evidence for third objective Discussion Summarize main finding Summarize supporting findings What are the implications/how does it change practice? Limitations Summary/conclusion