LAVC Strategic plan Progress Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Advertisements

LAVC STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRESS REPORT Presented to LACCD Board of Trustees Institutional Effectiveness Committee July 24, 2013.
Welcome Dr. Wise E. Allen- Chancellor Planning and Budgeting Integration Summit Friday, August 27, :00am-3:30pm.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
October 26,  FCSD Shared Decision Making Model The State of the District-The Big Picture District Guiding Principles Regents Reform Agenda FCSD.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Achieving the Dream to Strategic Plan
Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair
Committee Orientation
Accreditation Self-Study
Integrated Planning Roundtable May 22, 2017
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Self-Study Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Focused Midterm Report
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Strategic Planning Update
President’s Strategic Plan Mid-Year Progress Report
Wesley Beddard Associate VP, Programs
DE Coordinator’s November 2012 Telephone Meeting
Integrated Planning Roundtable August 28, 2017
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Presented To: College Planning Council
Guided Pathways at California Community Colleges
ECC Excels ECC’s Strategic Plan.
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Yuba Community College District Board of Trustees Meeting
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
FY15-16 Budget Request & Monitoring Training
Reedley College Accreditation Follow-Up Report
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
Guided Pathways Work Plan
Presented To: College Planning Council
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
South Seattle Community College
Planning and Goal-Setting
Presented To: College Planning Council
Office of Institutional Effectiveness November 4, 2014
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Accreditation follow-up report
Presented To: College Planning Council
Presentation transcript:

LAVC Strategic plan Progress Report Presented to LACCD Board of Trustees Institutional Effectiveness Committee July 24, 2013

College Strategic Plan Priorities & Outcomes Draft Goals for EMP 2013-2019 1.  Foster student success by supporting a learning-centered environment, student-centered instruction and support services. 2.  Increase equity by identifying gaps in achieving outcomes (transfer, associate degree, certificate, etc.) and implement effective models and programming to minimize gaps. 3.  Evaluate and improve all college programs and services through data-informed decision-making. 4.  Through the College’s shared governance structures, maximize institutional effectiveness through evaluation of environmental, human, physical, technological and financial resources. Educational Master Plan Revision Anticipated Approval Fall 2013 Focus Areas: Completion Equity Planning Infrastructure/ Institutional Effectiveness

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 1 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 1.2: Percentage of Eligible Students Receiving Financial Aid

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 1 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 1.2: Percentage of Eligible Students Receiving Financial Aid

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 2 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 2.1: Increase number of new students completing matriculation process by end of first semester

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 3 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 3.1: Percentage of new students successfully completing at least one English and Math class in their first year

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 1, Objective 3.2: Persistence

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objective 1 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objective 1.1: Measure of active learning/project learning; measure of student engagement in and out of class; measure of self-efficacy/self-directed learning LAVC District At this college, how often do you do each of the following? Give a presentation or performance in class, Work with other students in groups during class Work with others outside of class to prepare class assignments Often or Sometimes 63.0% 63.1% During your attendance at this college, have you done any of the following? Participated in a community-based or service project as part of a class Tutored or taught other students Attended a college sporting event, theatre production or musical performance Attended a college club meeting Yes 20.1% 19.7% How much have your experiences at this college both in and out of class helped/improved your ability to do the following? Learn effectively on your own Understand yourself Develop a personal code of values and ethics Develop clearer career goals Set educational goals and monitor your progress Very much or Quite a bit 64.0% 66.8%

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objective 2 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objective 2.1: Percentage of new student cohort completing milestones within 6 years

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objectives 2. 2 & 2 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objectives 2.2 & 2.3: Percentage of new student cohort completing milestones within 3 years

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objectives 2. 2 & 2 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objectives 2.2 & 2.3: Percentage of new student cohort completing milestones within 6 years

District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objective 2 District Strategic Plan Data - Goal 2, Objective 2.1: Percentage of new student cohort completing milestones within 3 years

Strategic Plan Goal Alignment LACCD LAVC Access & Preparation for Success Improve equitable access; help students attain important educational momentum points Increase student retention, persistence and success; Increase student access Teaching & Learning for Success Strengthen effective teaching and learning by providing a learner-centered educational environment; help students attain their goals of certificate and degree completion, transfer, and job training and career placement; increase equity in the achievement of these outcomes. Increase student retention, persistence & success; Increase student access; Enhance academic offerings to meet student and regional needs

Strategic Plan Goal Alignment LACCD LAVC Organizational Effectiveness Improve organizational effectiveness though data-informed planning and decision-making, process assessment, and professional development Enhance institutional effectiveness Resources & Collaboration Increase and diversify sources of revenue in order to achieve and maintain fiscal stability and to support District initiatives. Enhance, strengthen, and maintain mutually beneficial external partnerships with business, labor, and industry and other community and civic organizations in the greater Los Angeles area. Enhance academic offerings to meet student and regional needs

Evaluation of current process Progress On SLOs Evaluation of current process Revised Institutional Assessment Plan Identified infrastructure & professional development needs Increased involvement campus wide in review of submissions Leadership transition & restructuring Institutional Policies Fall 2013 (October) deadline Policy for establishing & assessing new courses Guiding Principles Maintain quality assessment through technical review Increase capacity for sustainability Use results for continuous improvement Document dialogue Explicitly link to resource allocation

Progress on SLOs All courses and programs have defined learning outcomes.

ACCJC Action: Warning Status Accreditation Update Next Steps Prepare and submit a follow up report by March 2014 addressing all the issues in our comprehensive report. Undergo a visit in spring 2014. The team will verify the report and forward their recommendation to the Commission Remain accredited but our status is not “reaffirmed” until we fully meet the standards. Continue on a path of continually improving. 2013 Events/Reports Annual Report SLO Proficiency Report Special Fiscal Report Comprehensive Visit June Commission Meeting ACCJC Action: Warning Status

ACCJC Findings -- March 14, 2013 Accreditation 2013 ACCJC Findings -- March 14, 2013 Self-Evaluation Actionable Improvement Plans (AIP) and Next Steps for LAVC   As was noted in the 2007 evaluation team report, in order to meet the standards the team recommends that the college incorporate evaluation, improvement and reevaluation of all its programs and services. Further it is recommended that the college provide learning and achievement data on students enrolled in all delivery formats, that the college fully evaluate indicators of effectiveness and make improvements based on the findings and that the college ensure systematic analysis of data to inform decisions.   By Fall we must achieve 100 percent completion of the outcomes assessment cycle in all academic and service areas (Responsible parties: PEPC, area VPs, Academic Senate; expected completion: end of fall 2013) II.A.1.c. We are in the process of establishing an institutional standard for core library educational materials based on analysis of long-term needs and integrating it into the college resource allocation process (Responsible parties: Library Department, Academic Senate, VP Academic Affairs; expected completion: spring 2013) II.C.1.a. The team recommends that the college evaluate its institutional planning process, including hiring decisions, and ensure planning practices are integrated and aligned with resources. The Institutional Effectiveness Council (IEC) conducts an annual retreat and evaluation of our committee processes. The Program Effectiveness and Planning Committee has completed an evaluation of the 2012-2013 annual planning cycle.

ACCJC Findings -- March 14, 2013 Accreditation 2013 ACCJC Findings -- March 14, 2013 Self-Evaluation Actionable Improvement Plans (AIP) and Next Steps for LAVC In order to fully meet the standards, the college must assess and align student learning outcomes at the course, program and institutional levels and use the results to improve student learning and institutional effectiveness. Within the next year we will achieve 100 percent completion of the outcomes assessment cycle in all academic and service areas (Responsible parties: PEPC, area VPs, Academic Senate; expected completion: end of fall 2013) II.A.1.c The team recommends that the college develop a formal definition of correspondence education and a process for determining the difference between correspondence education and distance education. This task has been completed and will now be integrated into our evaluation processes. To fully meet the standard, the college should ensure all employee performance evaluations are conducted on a timely basis in accordance with the employee contracts. This work is ongoing. To fully meet the standards, the college should ensure that records of complaints are routinely maintained as required by the policy on student and public complaints against institutions. This work is ongoing and also includes the District Compliance Office.

ACCJC Findings -- March 14, 2013 Accreditation 2013 ACCJC Findings -- March 14, 2013 Self-Evaluation Actionable Improvement Plans (AIP) and Next Steps for LAVC To meet the standards, the team recommends that the college, in collaboration with the district, put measures in place to ensure the efficient control and implementation of the bond program and that the facilities master plan be integrated with institutional planning. The roles of the District and College with regard to the Bond are currently under review.   To fully meet the standards, the college should discontinue its ongoing practice of deficit spending and develop a plan to ensure a balanced budget. The team recommends that the Los Angeles Valley College president effectively control budget and expenditures. The Team referred to the 2007 accreditation recommendations for linking planning to budgeting and resource allocation. This is a repeat finding that needs significant corrective action. In order to improve the linkage between budget and planning, the College will: Guide allocation decisions by prioritizing the objectives in the 2013-2019 Educational Master Plan (Responsible party: EPC, expected completion: fall 2013) I.B.3. We will fully implement a single-cycle comprehensive program review, which follows the new planning calendar (Responsible party: PEPC, expected completion: fall 2014) We are prepared to ensure that a budget prioritization process is fully developed, followed and widely communicated so the method used to make budgetary decisions is understood by all campus constituent groups (Responsible party: IEC, expected completion: spring 2013) III.D.1.d.

ACCJC Findings -- March 14, 2013 Accreditation 2013 ACCJC Findings -- March 14, 2013 Self-Evaluation Actionable Improvement Plans (AIP) and Next Steps for LAVC   In order to meet the standards, the team recommends that the Chancellor and the Board put accountability measures into place to ensure the long term fiscal stability and financial integrity of the college. The College has long expressed concerns about our ongoing structural budget deficit. The actions proposed above will be addressed in conjunction with the District.

Achieving the Dream/PASS Initiative Progress to Date Welcome Fair Prepare students and faculty/staff for the semester. Focus on “finding your way” and connecting to the campus community. Welcome Fair events: August 2012 (254 students), January 2013 (87 students), August 2013 Very highly rated by students Better retention (89% vs 85%) Better success (71% vs 59%) Better persistence to spring (73% vs. 52%) Tutoring Provide additional tutoring and workshops with special emphasis on developmental courses and central student success skills (e.g., critical thinking, study skills) Better success: Writing Center (82% vs. 71%); Math Lab (67% vs. 51%) Better retention: Writing Center (96% vs. 87%); Math Lab (90% vs. 79%) Almost all students used the learning strategies suggested by the tutors (100% Writing Center, 94% Math Lab)

Achieving the Dream/PASS Initiative Progress to Date Accelerated Math Shorten math sequence. Math 110: Introduction to Algebraic Concepts (combines 105 (Arithmetic) & 112 (Pre-Algebra) and Math 115 (Elementary Algebra) and 125 (Intermediate Algebra) immersion Additional sections of Math 110 and the Math 115/125 combination were scheduled for fall 2012, spring 2013 and fall 2013 24% of students on longer Math 105/112 pathway vs. 46% of those on accelerated (Math 110) path were ready to start Math 115 (spring 2013) Clear Pathways The catalog and schedule of classes will be reorganized around the major pathways to a degree/certificate, making these paths clearer to students. Student success checklists developed for website Analysis of FTEF allocations showed an under-allocation to certain GE areas (e.g., English, math and speech). Changes made in allocations to address the deficiencies. Participating in the District PIP and has formed the workgroup to begin structuring the pathways

Achieving the Dream/PASS Initiative Progress to Date Global Cohort Students will be registered into a math, English and student success course (PD1) based on placement results. The students will form an incoming cohort, but one that is global in nature focusing on success in a variety of ways. Pilot of Global Cohort spring semester 2013 approximately 140 students Data is currently being analyzed Larger sample of approximately 600 students is being recruited for the fall 2013 Goals Challenges and Next Steps Successfully complete remedial or developmental instruction and advance to credit-bearing courses Enroll in and successfully complete the initial college-level or gatekeeper courses in subjects such as math and English Complete courses with a grade of “C” or better Persist from one term to the next Earn a certificate or an associate degree Scaling up Institutionalization Lack of infrastructure AtD requirements

Newly Adopted Mission MISSION STATEMENT Los Angeles Valley College serves as a leader in student success, with pathways for certificates, degrees, transfer, and continuing education. We enable students to advance their education, personal development, and quality of life, empowering them to be productive and engaged members of the global community. Guiding EMP Revision & Institutional Priorities

Thank you