Decree of the Ministry of Interior 3rd August 2015 The “so called” Italian Fire Prevention Code - IFC: S6 – Fire Control and Suppression provisions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
Advertisements

Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
Initiating Devices Manual Fire Alarm Boxes Ionization Smoke Detectors
The BCA is referred to as a 'performance based' code, describing acceptable Performance Requirements that buildings throughout Australia must meet.
Caravan Park Fire Safety Update David Kearsley Fire Safety Program Leader CFA Headquarters.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION Ronald L. Lynn, Director/Building Official Gregory J. Franklin, Assistant Director Neil Burning, Manager.
BS9990 : 2015 Updates and/or Changes
Sustainable development of inland waterways transport Tamás Marton – Ministry of Transport, Communications and Energy – Hungary
Introduction to PPDs Regulatory requirements and rationale.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
1. Introduction 1.1. Fire program management involves the identification, evaluation, and control of hazards which may result in a fire OSHA & Emergency.
Health and safety at work
Fire Safety Jonathan Harrison Fire Protection Inspector West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Authority.
2012 International Fire Code Adopted as the minimum fire safety standard by the State of Wyoming City of Sheridan must adopt the minimum standard to retain.
ENGR ARIEL TAN MIRANDA, DFSE
Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 Fire Safety Fire Risk Assessment Case Study Ken Stevens Risk Services Manager ProAktive.
Regulation 16B As referenced in Approved Document B 2006.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Produced 27/06/05 Seeing the Future First Tom Welland Fire Services Manager.
Governmental Constraints on Construction Chapter 2.
CLIC CES Webex 12 Nov Summary: – Set of fire safety measures defined in CERN Safety Report – Proposed Structure for CLIC/ILC Fire Safety Report Fabio.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Monitoring and Evaluation in Humanitarian Aid: Quality Procedures PROJECT – STRAND 1 – Training and Capacity Building.
SEPA Compliance Assessment Scheme. Aims and Benefits 1.Proportionate 2.Consistent, fair and legally correct 3.Transparent and accountable 4.Targeted,
A guide to… Maintenance Safety. Aim There is a legal requirement for regular and effective maintenance, inspection and testing of work equipment. This.
Prof. Kyriakos Papaioannou ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY GREECE 7th Intern. Sprinkler Conference-Copenhagen 24-25/6/
CLIC CES Meeting 14 jan 2009 A resume table for fire safety in LHC, and a possible scheme for other machine – part 1 CERN –SC Fabio Corsanego.
Engineering Analysis of NFPA 285 Tested Assemblies
Neil Cooper Fire Safety Residential Implementing the Changes.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
Company for Urban Innovative Transport (CUIT) 19/12/2007 Request for proposal.
2 IMPACT - THE FIRE PERMIT = Hot Work Permit 3 Welcome ! This course is linked to the use of IMPACT, so it is assumed that: You know how to use IMPACT.
Over View of CENELC Standards for Signalling Applications
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Acetylene Storage in Enclosed Vehicle Compartments Thomas Kamm, P.Eng. Safety Engineering Specialist.
Development of Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions for Periodical Technical Inspections of Wheeled Vehicles and the Reciprocal Recognition.
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
Teknologi Pusat Data 12 Data Center Site Infrastructure Tier Standard: Topology Ida Nurhaida, ST., MT. FASILKOM Teknik Informatika.
Building Industry Authority Determination 2003/3 Commentary Paul Clements.
Managing Fire Safety In Common Parts of Flats and Mixed Use Buildings Simon Gibbins Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service.
Subpart F - Fire Protection & Prevention ( ) Flammables/combustibles - Approved containers Fire protection program/equipment 2A fire extinguishers.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision  Quality Management  Jos Kuijper, Manager.
Workshop on Accreditation of Bodies Certifying Medical Devices Kiev, November 2014.
BY FRANS WILBRINK WILBRINK & ASSOCIATES. OUTLINE Classify the different types of hazardous areas Identify the risks associated with each of these areas.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
CITY OF HARARE EMERGENCY SERVICES
Code of Practice for Fire Safety in New and Existing Community Dwelling Houses Eamon O’ Boyle.
World Health Organization
Financial Support to Third Parties
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
The Final Decision in the Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure in Ukraine as a Multilateral Agreement Tretiak Taras Associate Professor of National.
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
ARCHITECTURAL SAFETY FEATURES –Exit Separations –Continuation of Exit Stairs from lower to upper floors –Discharge from Exits FIRE PROTECTION FEATURES.
Decree of the Ministry of Interior 3rd August 2015 The “so called” Italian Fire Prevention Code - IFC: S7 – Fire Detection and Alarm Systems Piergiacomo.
Decree of the Ministry of Interior 3rd august 2015 the so called italian «Fire Prevention Code» S02 – Fire Resistance Dr. Eng. Luca Ponticelli Italian.
Hazardous Areas & Hazards of Electricity
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Fabric Air Dispersion Systems
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
General Requirements of NFPA 101
Smokes extraction principle
PSS verification and validation
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Parker domnick hunter. Safety of Electrical and
Staying legal: Machinery Safety and Visibility
CR-GR-HSE-302 Management of change
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
Frank Power Ergonomist (Inspector) Health and Safety Authority
Presentation transcript:

Decree of the Ministry of Interior 3rd August 2015 The “so called” Italian Fire Prevention Code - IFC: S6 – Fire Control and Suppression provisions

S.6: Fire Strategy Measure layout Introduction Performance Levels Generally accepted criteria for selecting the performance level Fire safety Design Solution: Deemed to satisfy solutions Alternative solutions

S.6 Introduction S6 Fire Control and suppression aims to: Design the provisions for controlling and suppressing a fire in an activity. Therefore, the need for portable, manual and automatic fire suppression systems can be selected using Chapter S.6.

S.6 Performance Levels I II III IV V Performance requirement Description I No Provisions Required. II Basic protection (control requirements of fire size) III Basic protection and Manual protection IV Basic protection, Manual protection and Automatic suppression system only extended to selected hazardous activity areas. V Basic protection, Manual protection and Automatic suppression system extended to the entire building or activity. Active fire protection measures are divided into five levels of performance; the first one is not suitable for activity subjected to fire inspections as no provision is required. Level II wants only a basic protection in order to contrast a starting fire (a fire of a limited size); level III requires the addition of a manual system to mitigate a fire developing in a compartment. The performance level IV requires all of the protection measures provided by level III, in addition to an automatic suppression system covering only selected hazardous areas of the activity. Finally, the highest level of active protection measures implies selecting all the portable and manual measures and also extending the automatic suppression system to the entire building or activity

S.6 Performance Level Criteria Selection The chapter S6 also contains generally accepted criteria to be followed in order to select the performance level according to the risks profile Rlife, Rprop, Renv and other hazardous parameters resulting from the assessed fire risk of the activity. The following Table describes the performance level compliant with acceptability criteria. Once the performance level is set following the result of the risk assessment, the designer knows the purpose of the selected level of performance.

S.6 Performance Level Criteria Selection Not allowed in fire inspection activities II Activities where all of the following conditions have been met: Risk profiles: Rlife included in A1, A2, B1, B2, Ci1, Ci2, Cii1, Cii2, Ciii1, Ciii2; Rprop equals to 1 or 2; Renv not significant; crowding density not greater than 0.7 persons/m2; all floors of the activity located at a height between -5 m and 32 m; specific qf fire load not greater than 600 MJ/m2; gross surface area of each compartment not greater than 4’000 m2; hazardous substances or mixtures are not used or stored in any significant quantities; hazardous processing as concerns fire and explosion is not performed.

S.6 Performance Level Criteria Selection III Activities not included in the other assignment criteria. IV According to the results of the risk assessment (e.g. activity with high crowding, activity with complex geometries or underground floors, high specific qf fire load, hazardous substances or mixtures (significant quantities), hazardous processing as concerns fire, ...). V If requested by the owner, provided for by project technical specifications, required by the authorities for strategic buildings safety, or required by vertical technical fire safety regulations.

S.6 Deemed to satisfy solutions The required safety level and its purpose lead the designer to select the correlated technical solution. In case of “deemed-to-satisfy solutions”, the IFC provides some prescriptive technical measures for the performance requirement levels II, III IV and V. Basic protection has the objective of ensuring the use of effective firefighting equipment at the initial phase of a fire, before it propagates to other portions of the activity. The types of extinguishers installed must be selected based on the classes of fires (e.g. class A fire extinguishers, ABC multi-purpose fire extinguishers, ...), determined according to the outcomes of risk assessment.

S.6 Deemed to satisfy solutions Following the deemed-to-satisfy solutions, the basic protection - Level II of performance - is fulfilled for a class A fire by placing a portable fire extinguisher sufficient for each 100 m2 of the protected area , with at least half of the fire extinguishers rated 34A, while the others can be 21A The number of class B extinguishers that should be installed, shall be such that the total extinguishing capacity CB is not less than the minimum extinguishing capacity CBmin = 144·S, where S is the protected area expressed in square meters. In addition, at least 50 % of CBmin must be provided by extinguishers with an extinguishing capacity not less than 144 B. Finally, the protected area must show a usable fire extinguisher reachability within a distance of 20 m.

S.6 Deemed to satisfy solutions Fire extinguishers must always be ready for immediate use: therefore they must be easily visible and reachable, near the exits from the floor and along escape routes, and near specific risk areas. If the fire risk assessment outcomes show the need for installing fire extinguishers effective on several fire classes (A, B, F..etc.), it is proposed that the number of different types of extinguisher be minimized according to the maximum reaching distances.

S.6 Deemed to satisfy solutions The S6 performance level III deemed-to-satisfy solution requires a hydrant system extended to the entire activity or, at least, to a single building compartment. This deemed-to-satisfy solution is based on a fire hydrant system designed according to the UNI 10779 Italian National fire hydrant standard, where: hazard levels, types of protection (external, internal…), and water-supply characteristics shall be set by the designer based on the outcomes of the fire risk assessment.

S.6 Deemed to satisfy solutions The S6 IV level of performance deemed to satisfy solution wants, other than fire extinguishers and hydrant systems, an automatic fire suppression system extended to selected building zones. The selection of the automatic protected zone is carried out on the basis of the outcomes of the fire risk assessment, also taking into account: - the effects on people of the extinguishing media and devices, - the size, power and topology of fires that should be controlled or suppressed. The deemed-to-satisfy solution for the design of an automatic suppression system merely requires the employment of the Italian or European technical standards, such as UNI EN 12845 for sprinklers, UNI EN 15004-1 for gas extinguisher systems and other relevant standards or technical specifications:

S.6 Deemed to satisfy solutions EN 16750:2017 Fixed firefighting systems - Oxygen reduction systems - Design, installation, planning and maintenance This European standard specifies oxygen reduction systems that are used as fire prevention systems by creating an atmosphere in an area which is having a lower permanent oxygen concentration as in ambient conditions. The level of oxygen reduction is defined by the individual risks of these areas. Oxygen reduction is achieved by technical systems which are providing a flux of air containing a reduced concentration of oxygen. Composition of normal air vs. hypoxic air

S.6 Deemed to satisfy solutions Ref: https://www.loc.gov/portals/static/about/office-of-the-inspector-general/documents/rpt2012janFireSuppressionSystems.pdf

Description of the application limits S.6 Alternative solutions For all the aforementioned deemed-to-satisfy solutions proposed by the IFC, an alternative solution can be adopted. IFC offers three ordinary fire safety design methods in order to demonstrate the achievement of the connected performance level requirements: Fire Design Method Description of the application limits Application of standards or technical documents The designer must apply standards or technical documents issued by internationally recognised fire-safety organisations. The selected standard or technical document must be fully implemented by means of solutions, configurations, materials and components recommended in the standards or technical documents, by specifically highlighting the suitability for each chosen configuration. Innovative products and technologies Innovative products or technologies are allowed when the compliance for the fire safety scope can be certified by testing protocol and safety analysis validated by third parties, national or international laboratories. Fire-safety engineering The designer must apply fire-safety engineering methods by means of assumptions and limits provided for by national and international fire engineering practice, according to the procedures set out in the chapters M1, M2 and M3 of the IFC.

S.6 References ISO/TS 11602-1:2010 Fire protection - Portable and wheeled fire extinguishers - Part 1: Selection and installation. BS 5306-8:2012 Fire extinguishing installations and equipment on premises. Selection and positioning of portable fire extinguishers. Code of practice. BS 5306-0:2011 Fire protection installations and equipment on premises. Guide for selection of installed systems and other fire equipment.