Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DATA DEMAND AND USE: S HARING I NFORMATION AND P ROVIDING F EEDBACK Session 5.
Advertisements

Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides. ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA.
Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.
GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.
Begin with the End in Mind
LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.
Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.
DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
Implementing the Data Quality Assessment Tool
U SING G EOGRAPHY TO S TRENGTHEN THE D ECISION -M AKING P ROCESS.
Increasing district level evidence-based decision making in Côte d’Ivoire Tara Nutley MEASURE Evaluation / Futures Group Mini University, Washington DC.
MEASURE Evaluation DATIM Data Exchange Denise Johnson
Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Strengthening Health Information Systems: Creating an Information Culture Manila, June 14, 2011 Theo Lippeveld, MD, MPH,
Introducing the Multi-Indicator Version of the RDQA Tool Presented at the MEMS - MEASURE Evaluation Brown Bag, Abuja December 7, 2012.
PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.
Regional Forum: Use of Gender Data in Sub-national Decision-making Kigali, Rwanda August 2012 Key Gender Terms and Concepts.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.
Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Session 1: Setting the Gender Policy Context.
Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.
Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
Building New Institutional Capacity in M&E: The Experience of National AIDS Coordinating Authority V F Kemerer Getting To Results IDEAS Global Assembly.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
Data Demand & Use: Information Use Map Webinar Series #2 Tuesday, January 24, 2012 Presenters: Eric Geers and Tara Nutley.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.
Management of RHIS Resources
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:
Community Health Information System in Action in SSNPR/Ethiopia
Difference-in-Differences Models
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
Introduction to Data Quality
Data Quality Assurance
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Using Data to Inform Community-Level Management
Session: 8 Disseminating Results
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
The PLACE Mapping Tool Becky Wilkes, MS, GISP Marc Peterson, MA, GISP
ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Measuring Success Toolkit
MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero
Monitoring and Evaluation of HIV/AIDS Programs Workshop Overview
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Training Content and Orientation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:
Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Information Systems for Health:
Information Systems for Health:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Data and Interoperability:
Measuring Data Quality
Introduction to Health Informatics
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification MEASURE EVALUATION Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification

Topics to Cover Review of the RDQA worksheets Review of the RDQA process Use of the tool for Data Verification

RDQA Worksheets Sheet 1 – Start Sheet 2 – Instructions Sheet 3 – Information Page Sheet 4 – Service Point 1 Sheet 5 – Service Site Summary Sheet 6 – District Site 1 Sheet 7 – District Summary Sheet 8 – Region Site 1 Sheet 9 – Regional Summary Sheet 10 – M&E Unit Sheet 11 – System assessment Summary Sheet 12 – Global Dashboard Sheet 13 – RDQA Final Action Plan Sheet 14 – List of Survey questions Open the RDQA Tool to show a quick overview of each worksheet

Ongoing Monitoring & Follow up The RDQA Process Data Verification System Assessment Interpret the Output Develop Action Plans Disseminate Results Ongoing Monitoring & Follow up

Part I of RDQA Tool: Data Verification Purpose Assess if sites are collecting and reporting data to measure the selected indicator(s) accurately and on time Cross-check the reported results with other data sources (service delivery level only)

Compares recounted to reported data Data Verification Quantitative Compares recounted to reported data Observe or Describe Connection between the delivery of services/commodities and the completion of the source document that records that service delivery Review Source Documents Review availability and completeness of all indicator source documents for the selected reporting period Verify reported data Cross-checks Perform “cross-checks” of the verified report totals with other data-sources Spot checks verify the actual delivery of services or commodities to the target populations Documentation review = describe answering yes/no questions to whether the source documents required for the assessment are available, completed and within the required reporting period.

Data Verification

Cross-checks Validate the primary data source against a secondary data source for the same reporting period E.g., cross-check data in the register with inventory records for treatment drugs, test kits, ITNs, etc. to see if these numbers match the reported results If possible, cross-checks should be performed in both directions Patient Treatment Cards Register Register Patient Treatment Cards Cross checks = verification of the value of the indicator found in the periodic summary report against an alternative data source. The degree to which the two sources match is an indication of good data quality. Give an example to illustrate this point.

Data Verification at Service Delivery Point 3 sub-components Reviewing source documentation Verifying reported results Cross-checking reported results with other data sources Each subcomponent includes questions to be answered by staff at the Service Delivery Site

Hopefully, source documents do not look like this Data Verification Hopefully, source documents do not look like this

Data verification at Intermediate Aggregation Site 2 sub-components Reviewing site reports Verifying reported results Each subcomponent includes questions to be answered by staff at the Intermediate Aggregation Site and M&E Unit

Data Verification in the RDQA Tool Now let’s explore the data verifications sections in more detail within the RDQA tool

Questions & Answers Q & A Exercise: Data verifications at Service Delivery Level

MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group, ICF International, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. government. MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and evaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.

www.measureevaluation.org