Andrew Snella Shannon Donovan Chanda Meek.  Awarded to Shannon Donovan and Chanda Meek in January 2011.  Supports work until June 30, 2011.  The purpose.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS4 Process.
A Review of Published Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) & Recommendations for Future Scholarly Work Darius Tandon, PhD Assistant Professor,
WTO Symposium, GENEVA,08 November, 2011 Study of Trade Facilitation Initiatives in Pakistan Implementing trade facilitation reforms: Aligning national.
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
NOAA Restoration Center
Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
The University of Priština, temporary settled in Kosovska Mitrovica (UPKM) Danijela Kulić, assistant lecturer, Faculty of Philosophy Nemanja Vasić, assistant.
Thematic evaluation on the contribution of UN Women to increasing women’s leadership and participation in Peace and Security and in Humanitarian Response.
Summary of theme 1 CHALLENGES Uta Wehn de Montalvo 30 May 2013.
University of the Western Cape HEQC /Finnish Project October 2008 Vincent Morta Quality Manager.
Alaska EPSCoR AHM May 27, 2010 Shannon Donovan University of Alaska Anchorage Department of Geography and Environmental Studies.
Development of a Regional DRM Strategy for the Tourism Sector in the Caribbean Regional Workshop – May 5th, 2009 – Trinidad & Tobago The Sixteen Steps.
1 What is Remediation Process Optimization? How Can It Help Me Identify Opportunities for Enhanced and More Efficient Site Remediation? Mark A. Gilbertson.
Relationships between Involvement and Use in the Context of Multi-site Evaluation American Evaluation Association Conference November 12, 2009.
School of Marketing Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science Sales management issues relating to cross-functional selling teams John Wilkinson.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
Transparency, Risk Communication and Stakeholder Engagement for a Diverse Audience in the 21 st Century Ruth Hull & Josephine Archbold Intrinsik Environmental.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Institutional analysis.
Geography in US Higher Education Growth, Change, and Development Sarah Witham Bednarz Texas A&M University.
Monitoring by NGOs for marine conservation management – examples from Indonesia “The big Grouper in the room”
School Counselors as Advocates The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 5 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom use and can.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Effective dissemination and evaluation
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2008 ERCOT Market Participant Survey February 12, 2008.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Information and Discovery in Neuroscience (IDN) Carole Palmer Graduate School of Library and Information Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
SAON Data Management Workshop Report June 7-8, 2010, Norway Recommendations (Extracted by Jan René Larsen, 25 September 2012),
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
Influence of Stakeholder Identification on Attitudes Towards Beaver Control Methods in North Dakota Kelly Pearce 1, Jennifer Bohrman 2, Sadie Stevens 1,2,3,
Phase 3 Environmental Documentation Process SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST AND GIANT SEQUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT.
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Challenges of using Urban Heart in Barcelona Carme Borrell.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Influencing Policy through Research: Introduction to Principles and Tools Arnaldo Pellini:
Sustainability Principles for Land Use and Mobility Approved by City Council – January 2007.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Clarifying the Evaluation Focus in a Complex Program Context Howard Kress, PhD* Natalie Brown, MPH** *Battelle Memorial Institute, with National Center.
TRTFN - BC Framework Agreement Planning Process Fred Oliemans, ILMB Bryan Evans, TRTFN Presentation to Public Workshop, Atlin, BC June 13, 2008.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
Value network analysis for complex service systems: Author : Juite Wang Jung-Yu Lai Li-Chun Hsiao Professor : Soe-Tsyr Daphne Yuan Presenter : Po-Wei Chiang.
Chapter 10 Understanding and Planning Reports and Proposals 10-1.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Teaching & Learning & Curriculum Leadership Program 2007.
Diversity Plan Update and Overview Dawn Wilkins Associate Professor University of Mississippi.
Session VI: Communication Plan
Review of draft radiation protection and safety law and regulations for Antigua and Barbuda Reviewed by Barbados.
Session I: Scoping Project and Explore Possibilities
School Counselors as Advocates
School Counselors as Advocates
Workshop on Enhancing Policy Dialogue in the Sunflower Oil Sector
Future of Public Health in Kansas: Local Pilot
Assessment of current management plan (EoH Tool 5)
Spatial Tools for Arctic Mapping & Planning
Achieving coexistence with large carnivores in the EU
Presentation transcript:

Andrew Snella Shannon Donovan Chanda Meek

 Awarded to Shannon Donovan and Chanda Meek in January  Supports work until June 30,  The purpose of our study is to better understand public perceptions regarding black bear management as well as the policy context within which decisions are made. We are conducting a social assessment and policy review of black bear management.

 Food Source  Predator  Hunted trophy species  Wildlife viewing opportunity  Tourist attraction

 Affects highly desired food sources ◦ Moose ◦ Young calves ◦ Caribou  1994 Intensive Management law which requires active management actions to boost populations of game vulnerable to decline in identified game management units

 There have been many attempts to understand how predator control may affect prey species, however the social context of predator control in Alaska and its feedbacks to policy change is poorly understood.  Extensive debate regarding the state of Alaska’s management practices and whether or not there is adequate baseline data and monitoring to justify lethal predator control measures.

 The National Research Council (1997) developed a set of 16 conclusions and recommendations for dealing with the complex social and biological challenges associated with managing predator-prey dynamics in Alaska.

 Conduct archival research of relevant literature  Review a sample of available transcripts from public meetings  Conduct phone interviews with key stakeholders  Perform an institutional analysis of black bear management

Three undergraduate UAA research assistants have helped:  Conduct archival research of relevant literature  Review a sample of available transcripts from public meetings  Draft interview scripts

 Complex issue ◦ “As a hunting and fishing organization the strives to promote fair chase hunting practices and principles… we urge the Board to reconsider passage of this new bear Policy.” –Backcountry Hunters and Anglers  Public Safety  Postponed black bear snaring decision until 2012

 Shannon and UAA undergraduate research assistants will conduct interviews with select key stakeholders.  Chanda and a UAF graduate student will perform an institutional analysis of black bear management.

Q: How and when do actors influence decision-making? Research In progress….  Systematic review of BOG predator control decisions since  Build an institutional map, document information flows.

 Analyze and follow up on the Boertje et al. article.  Dovetail our results into larger, interdisciplinary projects.

 We plan to submit grant proposals to the Wilburforce Foundation and the National Science Foundation Arctic Social Sciences ◦ Develop and implement a statewide survey to assess public perceptions on black bear management policies and decision-making

 We are collaborating with other researchers from UAA and UAF to develop a proposal for the NSF Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems ◦ Expand the project scope to assess social and ecological dynamics of predator-prey management strategies in the state

For more information contact: Shannon Donovan Chanda Meek