I3U Commitment 8. Strengthen science base for policy making through Joint Research Centres and Forum on Forward Looking Activities Venue: Vienna, I3U.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Moving the process forward Sálvano Briceño UN/ISDR.

Advertisements

WP4 – 4.1 and 4.2 Preparatory activities for the creation of the WATERMODE permanent network 1 Technical Committee Meeting Venice, June 24-25, 2010 VENETO.

Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building

Meaningful Patient Involvement In FP7 Research Nicola Bedlington Meaningful Patient Involvement In FP7 Research Nicola Bedlington Open Information Day.

Foresight in the strategic programming of Horizon 2020

EFSA’s Mission and Priorities Bernhard Berger Head of the Advisory Forum and Scientific Cooperation Unit Conference “Importance of food additives today.

Regional Trajectories to the Knowledge Economy: A Dynamic Model IKINET-EURODITE Joint Conference Warsaw, May 2006.

Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V

22 Feb 2007EU-Russia Co-operation1 Dr. Stephan Pascall Advisor to the Director Directorate G: Components and Systems DG Information Society and Media European.

© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU The Strategic Planning System at Central Public Administration.

Strengthening the Science-Policy Interface Towards Sustainable Development Dr. Gisbert Glaser International Council for Science (ICSU) Side Event at 2.

RESOURCE EFFICIENCY IN LATIN AMERICA: ECONOMICS AND OUTLOOK 1.

Transregional Workshop – Sofia, October 30, 2008 R4R Tools and Methodologies.

Ensuring Food Safety in Europe through Scientific Cooperation and Networking The Role of EFSA Carola Sondermann EFSA Polish Focal Point – Annual Experts.

Dr C Svanfeldt; DG RTD K2; October 6, Support for the coherent development of policies Regional Foresight in a European Perspective Dr. Christian.

EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.

WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.

Eurostat Forthcoming EU support to African capacity building for statistical production Pieter Everaers, Eurostat, Director of Cooperation in the European.

1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.

Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.

Kiel University, Germany Institute for Natural Resource Conservation Department of Ecosystem Management Benjamin Burkhard (Project coordinator) Enhancing.

St. John’s, Antigua May What is STAP? In 1994, the GEF Instrument sets up STAP – “UNEP shall establish, in consultation with UNDP and the World.

Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Planning of a Workshop CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON THE WATER CYCLE, RESOURCES AND QUALITY.

Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.

1 European Union - European Commission Delegation to China and Mongolia EU-China Biodiversity Programme (ECBP) Cooperation & Development Section.

The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.

EU Horizon 2020 Coordination and support action Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking Project coordinator: Benjamin Burkhard,

Eurostat I) Context & objectives of KIP INCA project Project owner is the Environment Knowledge Community (EKC) EKC is an EU inter-services group involving.

The European Transport Research Alliance - ETRA Prof. G. A. Giannopoulos Chairman, ETRA.

Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA priority 1: More effective National Research Systems Workshop for enlargement countries 10 March.

Russian Information-Analytical APEC Center for Agricultural Biotechnology.

Towards a European Innovation Partnership on „Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability Martin Scheele Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural.

Venue: Vienna Nevenka Čučković, IRMO (EIZ team)

This project is co-funded by the European Union

This project is co-funded by the European Union

This project is co-funded by the European Union

This project is co-funded by the European Union

Session 3: Advancing National Action and Capacity Development

This project is co-funded by the European Union

I3U Commitment 32 “Roll-out Global Research Infrastructure“

This project is co-funded by the European Union

Venue: WIIW, Vienna Andrea Mervar, EIZ

Venue: WIIW, Vienna Loredana Marmora and Margaret Pesuit, ISIS

I3U Project Meeting & Technical workshop Vienna, September 2015

This project is co-funded by the European Union

Commitment 9: Set out EIT strategic agenda

EERA e3s and Energy Consumers

I3U Commitment 27 “A – Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard B – Research Programme on Public Sector and Social Innovation“ Venue: Vienna, I3U Project Meeting.

This project is co-funded by the European Union

This project is co-funded by the European Union

This project is co-funded by the European Union

This project is co-funded by the European Union

Erasmus+ ( ): 3 Key Actions

Introduction to the EEA and the EIONET

Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments

European social dialogue A new start for social dialogue

Priority 3 NMP: generalities

The new European Consensus on Development

Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland

Commitment 18 “Eco-innovation”

I3U “C6 Literature Review Presentation“

Merlijn van Rijswijk, Marcel Kleijn et al

I3U “Methodological debriefing“ 2nd Meeting –

Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments

I3U “Investigating the Impact of the Innovation Union“

Date and venue: 23 September, MSFD PCG, DG Environment, Brussels

I3U “Introduction of the Workshop“ 2nd Meeting –

River basin management plans in Europe

Merlijn van Rijswijk, Marcel Kleijn et al

Presentation transcript:

I3U Commitment 8. Strengthen science base for policy making through Joint Research Centres and Forum on Forward Looking Activities Venue: Vienna, I3U Project Meeting & Technical Workshop, 14-15.09.2015 Warsaw School of Economics, World Economy Research Institute, Poland

The Rationale for Commitment 8: Commitment 8 of the Innovation Union "The Commission will also create a European Forum on Forward Looking Activities bringing together existing studies and data and involving public and private stakeholders to improve the evidence base of policies."

An Overview of Activities Committed in the Innovation Union to Support Science Base for Policy Making The activity of Joint Research Centre (JRC) and European Forum on Forward Looking Activities may bring research results useful for: - Evidence-based polices; - Foresight-based policies. Why Is It Necessary to Strengthen Science Base for Policy Making in the EU? Better coordination of European policies; Longer policy perspective; Europeanising visions of development; Providing independent evidence-based scientific and technical support for EU policy design and implementation. Science-based policies

The Map of Commitment 8. Source: Own elaboration.

Conclusions (1) Theory of public policy underlines the following factors that can determine the impact of science-based policies on innovation: Content of scientific input (quality of evidence and its relevance) (Stromsdofer, 1985; Nutley, 2003; Packwood, 2002; Shaxson, 2005; Newman et. al., 2012) The appropriate use of scientific evidence and rationality of its application (Jann&Wegrich, 2007; Sutherland et. al, 2012; Cairney, 2012) The organisational aspects of the policy advice process: the stage of policy cycle in which science input is used, the model of policy-science interface, the size, type and power of scientific advisory body and the nature of advisory body mandate (Habermas, 1971; Pielke Jr., 2007; Bijker et. al., 2009; Wilsdon, 2014; Edenhofer and Kowarsch, 2015)

Conclusions (2) On the basis of empirical literature 3 main types of impact of science-based research on innovation can be distinguished and should be covered in the impact assessment: 1. Economic impact (e.g. introduction of new policies, harmonized implementation of policy, development of special products, developing skills , developing & employing methodologies) Social impact (enhancing cooperation and human capital, changing cooperation patterns, integrating stakeholders, setting international examples of good practices, promoting gender equality) 3. Environmental impact (e.g. quality improvement (environment), climate change, preserving biodiversity)

Tentative proposal of indicators measuring impact of Commitment 8. Input measures Throughput measures Output measures Number of EU regulations proposed on the basis of the work of JRC Number of new methods of standardization implemented (also globally) Number of JRC customers Deliverables supporting policy (e.g. reports, tests, methods) and science (e.g. peer-reviewed publications, scientific reports) JRC publications (number and citations) Number of JRC partners (collaboration agreements) R&D budgets for JCR and EFLA EFFLA publications (number of policy papers and policy briefs) Number of researchers working for JRC

Thank you Marzenna Anna Weresa marzenna.weresa@sgh.waw.pl In modalità Presentazione fare clic sulla freccia per accedere alla pagina della guida introduttiva di PowerPoint.