Vacuum chamber for the CMS forward region

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M.Oriunno/ D.Druzhkin Situation du projet collier pour préparation du 'Work Package' en Iran prepared by : M. Oriunno &
Advertisements

1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
GlueX Simulations Status Report on CD3 geometry Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, January 10-12, 2008.
Consolidation and Upgrade of the LHC Experimental Vacuum Sectors
Status of the Polarized 3He Target
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
Engineering Division 1 Mechanical and Integration CD0 Walkthru, 19-Dec, 2007 Eric Anderssen, LBNL.
Shielding the Weiner PSU 7 May 2013 Kiril Marinov ASTeC, MaRS, DL 1.
Coupler without copper coating S. Kazakov 11/13/2013.
October 28-th, 2005Straw tracker 1 Status of Straw Tracker for P236 P.L. Frabetti, V.Kekelidze, K.Kleinknecht, V.Peshekhonov, B.Peyaud, Yu.Potrebenikov,
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
HAMBURG BEAM PIPE POSSIBLE LAYOUT AND MANUFACTURING JANUARY 2012.
ACFA-7; Taipei, Nov 2004 H.Weerts status Si licon D etector Status H.Weerts Fermilab/Michigan State Univ. (Progress on Si-tracker layout)
1 Jim Thomas - LBL HFT Issues that may Bear on the Fate of the SSD & SVT presented by Jim Thomas 07/07/2006.
Alice overview New detector and chamber ALICE TC.
Vienna Fast Simulation LDT Munich, Germany, 17 March 2008 M. Regler, M. Valentan Demonstration and optimization studies by the Vienna Fast Simulation Tool.
Experimental Sectors Ray Veness / AT-VAC With many thanks to G.Foffano + W.Cameron TS/MME Patrick Lepeule / AT-VAC.
Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC January 17, 2003TOTEM plenary meeting -Marco Bozzo1 CSC detectors for T1.
EAR2 Beam Line Report on the Status C. Weiss EAR2 Beam Line - Report on the Status1.
SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
Beampipe Installation Status Ray Veness For the Beampipe team in AT/VAC and TS-MME.
Hcal Geometry and Assembly Videoconference January 2008, 24th.
Shielding the turbomolecular pump and the vacuum gauge 11 June 2013 Kiril Marinov ASTeC, MaRS, DL 1.
Status of the Experiment RRB - TOTEM 16 April 2013 S.Giani - CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration CERN-RRB
XML Description of Beam Pipe Geometry  For XML description of Beam Pipe were used: Det/XmlDDDB/v6, Det/XmlEditor/v4, Det/DetDesk/v8, Vis/GaudiLab/head.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
CMS Luminosity Status Report
Bunching system for SPES project
Forward Tagger Simulations
Ti/SS transitions A.Basti INFN-PISA*
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BHAVNAGAR TOPIC : INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS Prepared By :- 1.Aal Akash Ansari Aarif.
CLAS12 Beamline Configurations
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Development of a low material endplate for LP1 and ILD
General remarks about the HESR and PANDA vacuum system
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Machine-Experiment Interface
SILICON PIXELS DETECTOR
Update on DECAL and some questions
EBTF Design Review Technical Meeting Group
Changes to SiD since the DBD
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
ATLAS ITk CO₂ Cooling pipe routing CO₂ Meeting, 28 June 2016
Upgrade Strategy for the Experimental Vacuum Systems
IDEA Detector Simulation Status
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
ATLAS ITk CO₂ Cooling pipe routing Common Mechanics meeting
HPL DG d=1.4mm/e= mm.
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS
Thin Target effusion calculations using GEANT4
RICH simulation for CLAS12
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
… continue with realistic particle
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
Cryostats Some ideas for the new Q1 to Q3 Hi-Lumi WP3 meeting
SHMS Downstream Beamline
Detectors for future accelerators
IR Beam Transport Status
Presentation transcript:

Vacuum chamber for the CMS forward region To measure with good precision the total inelastic rate it has been shown by TOTEM (G. Matthiae and V. Verzi) that the inelastic detector must be able to measure over 4 units of rapidity for eta>3 due to the necessity to properly evaluate the fraction of diffractive events. The possibility of extending the study of diffractive physics to larger eta by a joint CMS-TOTEM effort also depends on a better configuration of the vacuum chamber in the CMS very forward region. Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

The TOTEM Vacuum chamber The actual design of the vacuum chamber is not optimized for either TOTEM or diffraction studies. After some general comments on the shape of the vacuum chamber, I will show a possible design. What do we have now? The region between 10 and 15 m. General remarks. Feasible proposal. The region between 15 and 18 m ???? The plots have been prepared by Marco Oriunno Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies 10.5 m to 15 m (HF Pipe) Present CMS version: three cylindrical sections 200, 280 and 420 mm diam. and a thin window of 506mm inner diameter (bad for smaller eta range: 5 to 6) RF compliance with a 10 degrees copper cone, perforated, 0.2 mm thick (?) to a diam of 56 mm and bellows at entrance of small diameter region (bad for large eta range: 6 to 8) Design constraints due to: transitions (RF reasons) may have a maximum slope of 15 degrees. bellows at 11m must be of same diameter as the one fitted in the conical part at z=3.1m (now in the region of 5.8<  < 6.1) (i.d. 78mm, o.d.160 mm) with complicated sliding mechanism Limitations in diameter due to HF (max diam. 200mm at z=13m) Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies The present design Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies The material in the 3 regions Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies Region A 1 2 3 7 8 4 5,6 9 2 8 4 1 5,6 3 7 9 Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies Region B 3 4 5 6 2 3 1 6 3 Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies Region C Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies 15m to 18m (Forward pipe) At present: Cylindrical Aluminum pipe with i.d. 55mm and 2mm thick Cantilevered pipe support fixed to shielding. very important for overall vacuum chamber stability Present design greatly limits access for T2. Max. radius for detectors in the shielding is 250mm ( = 4.75) OK for Total Cross section Min. radius or max eta is less than 7… NOT adequate for diffraction studies. Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies Towards a New Design (1) For particles in range of interest present design requires multiple vacuum chamber crossing and large amount of material in detector region. Cannot ask to make the bellow at 11 m larger in diameter: Has to be same size as the bellow in the conical section in order to balance the hydrostatic pressure, in order not to load the tracker which supports the vacuum chamber at z~3.5m Increasing the diameter of both bellows implies moving the one in the cone at larger z and will jeopardize the installation scenario of the Pixel detector Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies Towards a New Design (2) To avoid re-entry of tracks in the vacuum chamber need pointing conical section (possibly only one). will concentrate all material in one eta region PROPOSAL Cone from a diam. of 78 mm at z = 11 (~5.82) At z~x? start reduction of diameter to TAS opening complying with RF requirements Decreasing 15 degree cone Traditional T2 (outside the vacuum) covering an eta range between 5 and 5.8 New more sophisticated T3 (to detect particle still inside the vacuum chamber) … can go to eta ~8.5 Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002

Diffractive friendly design Marco BOZZO INFN Genoa CMS-TOTEM meeting on diffraction studies March 8, 2002