The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Advertisements

DOE O Changes and the CRS
Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management System Overview.
1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
TERMINATION AND RECOVERY. Termination of the Emergency Considerations for event termination If the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) has not been activated,
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 EM Update and Perspective David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management 2012 DOE Project Management Workshop April 3, 2012.
Interagency Refinery Task Force Gina M. Solomon, M.D., M.P.H. Deputy Secretary for Science and Health California Environmental Protection Agency
Remediation Challenges and Stakeholder Engagement: A Canadian Perspective Michael Binder President Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Presentation to the.
DOE Region 8 Radiological Assistance Program Response Capabilities
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Developing a Chemical Risk Management Program
Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Control and Radiological Services.
TRU Waste Processing Center Culture and Successful Implementation of an ISO Certified Environmental Management System Presented at the DOE ISM Conference.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Consultants’ Meeting to develop a guidance document on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an.
Safety and Loss Control
Safety Analysis Working Group FY2010 EFCOG Semi-Annual Meeting Brad Evans, Chair Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Rob McKeehan, Vice-Chair Oak Ridge.
1 Los Alamos Legacy Cleanup Completion Project (LCCP) Post Fiscal Year 2016 Contract(s) Industry Day Request For Information & Capability.
NRC Leadership Expectations and Practices for Sustaining a High Performing Organization NRC Commissioner William C. Ostendorff FR/SSO/FS Workshop U.S.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.
Tank Operations Contract 1 Presenters: Fred Beranek Everett Gray Results of EFCOG/DOE Safety Culture Pilot Focus Group Assessment DOE ISMS Conference August.
Introduction to Workplace Safety
1 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division James Mason Institutional Affairs Manager Carlsbad.
Integrating ISMS Safety Concepts and Tools into the Design of CH2M HILL’s Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System September 12-13, 2006.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.4. Pre-disposal waste management Safety Standards.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Management of Unneeded Materials and Chemicals (UMC) Arnold Edelman Office of Science May 2006.
1 LICENSING A U.S. GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY WILLIAM BORCHARDT Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
1 Resuming Operations at WIPP Frank Marcinowski Acting Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for The Office of Environmental.
U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office Legacy Cleanup Completion Project DOE National Cleanup Workshop September 29,
Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.
Containing Toxicity with Policy Natural Disaster.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Introduction to a Safe Workplace
Application of Calibrated Instruments in Medical Facilities MAJ H. Mike Stewart, Jr., MS, CHP April 17, 2009.
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E Reister CE Presentation 1/98 1 Program Elements and Related Activities Rich Reister U.S. Department.
HANNAH WALKER RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
WIPP National TRU Program
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
Facilities Incident Notification. Reporting Requirements All employees are required to report immediately any incidents, accidents, or major equipment.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM--FALL 2014 MEETING
Worker Safety and Health Enforcement Program Update
Egyptian Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority (ENRRA)
EFCOG STARTUP AND COMMISSIONING TASK TEAM INTRODUCTION
EFCOG STARTUP AND COMMISSIONING TASK TEAM INTRODUCTION
Uranium in Colorado: Past, Present, and Potential Future
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
Low Level Radioactive Waste Forum, Fall 2014 Meeting
Shipping to WIPP Travis R. Myers 5/24/17 GV ppt.
Overview of Waste Disposition Activities Fall 2017 LLW Forum Meeting
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction and Background
Consultants’ Meeting to develop a guidance document on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation 04, Feb. – 08, Feb.
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Regulatory Infrastructure and Transport Safety Section
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Nuclear Emergency Planning and Preparedness
NRC Oversight on Storage of Special Nuclear Material
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Dr. Hany Sallam & Regulatory Activities
U.S. Department of Energy Perspectives on Waste Classification
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective David Martin, Cabinet Secretary NM Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD) Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Fall 2014 Meeting Denver, Colorado October 30, 2014

Outline Summary of Events Leading to Suspension of Operations DOE’s Response: A Regulator’s Perspective (NMED) Negatives Positives A Path Forward for Re-opening WIPP Identification and Resolution of the Problems Facility Operation DOE Management Independent Peer Review Stronger Oversight State Plans and Requests

Fire and Radiological Release Feb 5, 2014: Vehicle Fire Ineffective maintenance, fire protection and emergency management/preparedness Feb 14, 2014: Radiological release Ventilation/filtration system did not operate correctly Amount of radiation released is below any threshold that would indicate a public health hazard 21 employees at WIPP tested positive for radiological contamination, but “dose does not represent a clinically significant exposure”

DOE’s Response from the Perspective of a Regulator Negatives WIPP: Initial Communication with Regulator & Public Damaged DOE’s Credibility at the Start Pace of the Investigation is Moving Too Slowly LANL: Poor Communication with Regulator is Damaging DOE’s Credibility & Increasing Potential Liability DOE HQ: Difficulty Keeping Everyone Focused

DOE’s Response (cont.) Positives Multi-Laboratory Technical Assessment Team & LANL Teams (Energetics Team, Remediation Planning Team, Chemical Reactions Team) WIPP: Town Hall Meetings & Communication with Regulators WIPP: Recovery Plan Looks Promising

New Mexico’s Initial Views on How to Move Forward at WIPP Root Cause of Release Must be Identified & Verified by Independent Team Interim Panel Closure: Panel 6 ASAP & Panel 7, Room 7 Pending Accident Investigation Board Findings Eliminate the Silo Effect at WIPP/Generator Sites DOE-HQ Cannot Manage Recovery Operations from Washington, D.C. DOE-EM Must be Given Control of Legacy Waste Cleanup at LANL and Throughout the Complex

DOE Actions to Date Decontamination at WIPP more than 50% completed Ongoing assessments by Accident Investigation Board and Technical Assessment Team Office of Inspector General Management Alert* WIPP Recovery Plan** Cleanup of transuranic waste at LANL will be transitioned from NNSA to DOE-EM Improved communication and transparency at Carlsbad Town Hall Meetings *Remediation of Selected Transuranic Waste Drums at Los Alamos National Laboratory- Potential Impact on the Shutdown of the Department’s Waste Isolation Plant (Sept. 2014) **Waste Isolation Pilot Plant--Road to Recovery (Sept. 30, 2014)

Independent Peer Review All scientists currently studying the radiological event are DOE employees or contractors of DOE Independent team of experts is needed Review DOE’s conclusions regarding the root cause of the radiological release Define procedures to ensure this problem will never happen again

Stronger Oversight Among Oversight Agencies Multiple Regulatory Agencies (22) Involved, including U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission N.M. Environment Department (NMED) N.M. Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring and Research Center (CEMRC) Mine Safety and Health Administration N.M. and U.S. Department of Transportation Alliance of key agencies and local government for coordination and accountability to the public

State Plans and Requests State will request funding for an independent peer review team led by New Mexico Tech State will convene a meeting of the key WIPP oversight agencies and local government officials Stronger coordination among agencies Community Assurance Program for improved communication Request management changes at DOE A full-time DOE employee at the CBFO with decision-making authority to run the WIPP recovery Ensure FY16 funding Better collaboration with generator sites

Questions?