Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE a Submission April 2005 Welborn (Freescale) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Advertisements

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [TG3a Performance Considerations in UWB Multi-Band] Date.
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission November 2004 Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE r3 Submission November 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission February 2004 McCorkle, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Date Submitted: [18 March 2004]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Rick Roberts, XtremeSpectrum
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 January 2004
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
Submission Title: [TG4a General Framework]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Name - WirelessHD doc.: IEEE g July 2010
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Multi-band OFDM Proposal References]
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Sub-GHz proposal for ] Date Submitted:
July 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [FCC-UWB-certifications-below-1-GHz] Date Submitted:
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
February 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Compromise for UWB Interoperability –
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Compromise Proposal] Date Submitted: [12Sept2004]
Submission Title: [Rate one over four code for TG4a]
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <xyz> January 2001
May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Multi-User Support in Designs of UWB Communication.
Submission Title: [Errors in a] Date Submitted: [18 March, 2010]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> November 2012
Project: IEEE P WG for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Sub-GHz proposal for ] Date Submitted:
July 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c rate-range requirements: looking forward]
Submission Title: [Compromise Proposal] Date Submitted: [12Sept2004]
Submission Title: [Reasonable Compromise Proposal]
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
May 203 doc.: IEEE r1 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
March, 2003 doc.: IEEE /127r0 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Alternate PHY.
Submission Title: [TG3a Closing Report September 2005]
Submission Title: [Uniform bandplan for TG4a Modulation]
Submission Title: [Reasonable Compromise Proposal]
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
<month year>20 Jan 2006
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [FEC Multipath performance for TG4a ]
Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution for FSK/GFSK Prior Comments]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [UWB Coexistence Issues] Date Submitted:
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> <March 2016>
Submission Title: [TG3a Compromise Proposal]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> <March 2003>
June, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [OFDM PHY Mode Representation] Date Submitted:
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> <March 2016>
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary.
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Merger Proposal #2 Affirmation of Commitment.
Submission Title: [TG3a Compromise Direction]
May 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Comparison of Responses to Task Group j.
12/15/2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [AWGN Simulation Results] Date Submitted:
May 203 doc.: IEEE r2 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Presentation transcript:

Date Submitted: [18 March 2004] Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Scaling-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-High-Aggregate-Data-Rates] Date Submitted: [18 March 2004] Source: [Matt Welborn] Company [Motorola] Address [8133 Leesburg Pike Vienna, VA USA] Voice:[703-269-3000], E-Mail:[mwelborn@xtremespectrum.com] Re: [] Abstract: [A proposal for a common frequency plan for DS-UWB and MB-OFDM to enable a common signaling mode] Purpose: [Provide technical information to the TG3a voters regarding a possible common signaling mode compromise] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Welborn Motorola

Outline Scaling baseline PHY modes Higher frequency bands March 2004 Outline Scaling baseline PHY modes Higher frequency bands Higher data rates Welborn Motorola

DS-UWB Operating Bands March 2004 DS-UWB Operating Bands Low Band High Band 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 GHz GHz MB-OFDM Operating Bands Welborn Motorola

Multi-piconet Overview March 2004 Multi-piconet Overview DS-UWB low band and high band 2x center frequency & BW in high band Support for 6 piconets in each of low band and high band MB-OFDM has added full FDM support for multiple piconets using band groups New band groups have higher frequencies All use same TFCs For both proposals, higher frequency bands will experience worse RF losses Likely higher receiver noise figures Welborn Motorola

Multipath Ranges for 110 Mbps March 2004 Multipath Ranges for 110 Mbps * * Band group 5 has 2 bands  rate or range is lower Welborn Motorola

Assumptions for Comparison March 2004 Assumptions for Comparison Assumptions for multiple piconet support All piconets >5GHz assumed to have +2dB NF Assume multipath ranges reduced by 20*Log(Fc ratio) All piconets are outside UNII except Band Group 2 UNII devices ~30dB higher transmit power 802.11a, cordless phone, TDWR, DSRC… Typical UNII device within about 100-200m of BG2 piconet will degrade sensitivity 6dB (~½ range) Assumes erasure decoding present to partially mitigate UNII RFI Dynamic UNII protection may increase NF/BOM (03/141r3, p.12) Seems unlikely that this would be acceptable to user/OEM Does not meet selection criteria of <1 m for 802.11a separation Assumptions about acceptable distance ratio, 2 cases Distance ratio of <=1.5 is required for multi-piconet support Distance ratio of <=1.0 is required for multi-piconet support Assumes adequate adjacent band/band group isolation Welborn Motorola

Piconets & Multipath Range March 2004 Piconets & Multipath Range Band Group 2 shown degraded 6 dB (UNII Device at 100-200 m) Band Group 4 With 2 “piconets” Welborn Motorola

Piconets & Multipath Range March 2004 Piconets & Multipath Range Band Group 2 shown degraded 6 dB (UNII Device at 100-200 m) Band Group 4 With 1 “piconets” Welborn Motorola

DS-UWB scaling to Higher Rates March 2004 DS-UWB scaling to Higher Rates There is significant interest in “cable replacement” applications that require high speed operation (480+ Mbps) at short range DS-UWB operation at 500 Mbps uses L=2 code & ¾ FEC Complexity is similar DS-UWB receiver for 110 & 220 Mbps Same ADC bit widths & clock rates Same rake bit width & complexity Fewer rake taps available (only 2/3 as many as for 220 Mbps) Viterbi decoder for k=6, rate ¾ likely 2x gates  45k gate increase Operation at 660 Mbps also supported with un-coded operation 4.9 m range in fully impaired AWGN simulation Eliminates requirement for high speed Viterbi decoder Complete, fully impaired multipath simulations for 500-1000 Mbps DS-UWB are underway Welborn Motorola

MB-OFDM scaling to Higher Rates March 2004 MB-OFDM scaling to Higher Rates Currently available complexity estimates for MB-OFDM implementations do not support operation at > 200 Mbps Document 267r5, p. 35 Estimated MB-OFDM receiver complexity scaling for 480 Mbps 5-bit ADC required instead of 4-bit ADC at lower rates (Doc# 03/267) Increased bit-width for internal FFT processing 45 bits is 25% increase  assume 25% higher gate count (conservative) This scales FFT engine from 70-100k gates to 90-125k gates @ 85 MHz 25k gate increase over current estimates for 200 Mbps implementation K=7 Viterbi decoder does not operate at 480 Mbps SiWorks (Document 03/213r0) estimates that 480 Mbps, k=7 operation would be possible, but would require a 4-wide parallel implementation SiWorks estimate for 200 Mbps k=7 Viterbi is 75k gates at 100 MHz Equivalent to 88 k gates at 85.5 MHz SiWorks estimate for 480 Mbps is 110K gates at 120 MHz  154k gates at 85.5 MHz (about 2x the <=200 Mbps Viterbi complexity) K=7 Viterbi decoder would require an increase of 80k gates @ 85MHz Welborn Motorola

DS-UWB & MB-OFDM Complexity Scaling March 2004 DS-UWB & MB-OFDM Complexity Scaling Complexity increase for MB-OFDM receiver Increase for FFT & Viterbi is >100k gates @ 85 MHz Total complexity now >550 k gates at 85.5 MHz Based on estimate of 295k gates at 132 MHz Complexity increase for DS-UWB receiver Increase in gate count due only to Viterbi decoder, 54k gates Total receiver complexity now ~230 k gates at 85.5 Mhz For un-coded operation at 660 Mbps, no Viterbi decoder Power consumption equivalent to 130 k gates at 85.5 MHz DS-UWB digital baseband complexity is only ~30-40% of the equivalent MB-OFDM implementation Welborn Motorola