Strengthening multi-sectoral collaboration: a framework for building interactive capabilities Glenda Kruss HESA Conference 3-4 April 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPA in Croatia Ministry of Science, Education and Sports Nataša Maršić, PhD.
Advertisements

The project is funded by the European Union Institutional capacity development of the three innovation centres and research sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
World Bank Financial Management Sector September 2010.
Excellence with Impact Declan Mulkeen January 2011.
Industry-School Partnerships: Boundary crossing to enable school-to-work transitions across three targeted industries.
MerSETA Strategic Plan Derrick Peo General Manager : Innovation, Research & Development.
BA Damonse, March Operational Prospects for Implementation: A Reflection Informed, critically engaged & science literate public.
DELIBERATIONS. From the Higher Education and FET Commission at SAMSA Skills Summit 2011 VISION To promote the delivery of a globally competitive teaching,
Social science that makes a difference The role of universities in innovation for inclusive development: insights from the CUPP programme Dr Glenda Kruss.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
BILL GATES’ CONTRIBUTION IN SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Public engagement and lifelong learning: old wine in a new bottle, or a blended malt? Paul Manners Director, National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
Analysing university-firm interaction in the SADC countries: An initial overview Glenda Kruss SARUA workshop October 2008.
Expression of Interest UNICA Science Parks and Incubator Network.
KIC InnoEnergy SE - CC Poland Plus Business Creation KIC InnoEnergy Highway Krakow, 12 April 2011.
Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council.
Innovation Systems Research Network MCRI Theme III: Social Inclusion and Civic Engagement David A. Wolfe, Ph.D. Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation.
1 From Disseminating Knowledge to Promoting Innovation: Challenges in reforming agricultural extension Rasheed Sulaiman V Centre for Research on Innovation.
1 February Partnership between PGWC & CHEC Objectives are to:  draw on the research and teaching resources of the universities to support the development.
Accelerating the development of world-class Irish companies to achieve strong positions in global markets resulting in increased national and regional.
Office of Science and Innovation Universities and Innovation in the UK Chris North Office of Science and Innovation UK Department of Trade and Industry.
Judie Kay & Peter Shadbolt Industry Liaison Beyond the Silos: Developing a Corporate Approach to Industry Engagement.
Glenda Kruss 15 November 2013 The role of diverse types of universities in innovation for inclusive development Social science that makes a difference.
Business Model for an Industrial development agency
Global Change grand challenge SANBI Research & HCD strategy launch: 1-2 Dec 09.
Expert Input : Review of Days 1 & 2 1. Forum Days 1 & 2 2 Overview of Days’ 1 & 2 Themes, Sessions, and Guiding Questions.
A Health Innovation Systems Approach: The Opportunity and the Challenge Dr. Padmashree Gehl Sampath Department for Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual.
1 The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan: Main Conclusions and Recommendations.
Fraunhofer ISI Institute Systems and Innovation Research Trentino plus 10 Foresight Workshop July 2003 (Trento) Trentino plus 10: Innovation system.
Global Forum – Innovation for Green Growth East London, South Africa 30 th May 2013 Inclusive Green Growth through Innovation Dr Charity Mbileni Senior.
11 Workshop on Establishment of a Continental Accreditation Agency for Higher Education in Africa 10 – 11 April 2013, Addis Ababa Rationale for Establishing.
15 November 2013 Cape Town 9 October 2013 Linking knowledge producers and marginalised communities: DST/ HSRC/ CPUT Science seminar Social science that.
1 Innovation and innovation policies in developing countries in the framework of PaceNet+ Ludovico Alcorta Director. Research, Statistics and Industrial.
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: University of Bath Roadmap for EPSRC Catherine Pink Institutional.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
The White Paper on Post School Education and Training A SETA Perspective.
Technology Transfer and IP framework initiatives May 2011.
How do academics extend their knowledge to the benefit of external social partners? Genevieve Haupt, Glenda Kruss and Mariette Visser NRF Mini-Conference.
An Introduction to the European Academy of Business in Society and the RESPONSE project Dr. Pablo Collazzo-Yelpo, EABIS Director, Academic Affairs Kiev.
The Role of Government in Building Absorptive Capacity Ken Warwick DTI Knowledge Economy Forum VI 17 April 2007.
NHS European Office Accessing EU structural funding Michael Wood, European Policy Manager 25 July.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
Innovation and Economic Infrastructures DIMETICS Pecs July Keith Smith Australian Innovation Research Centre.
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:
INVOLVEMENT OF SECTORAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING AUTHORITIES IN FET COLLEGES BRIEFING BY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE.
1 25th May Wroclaw DISTRICT+ Disseminating Innovative STRategIes for Capitalization of Targeted Good Practices DISTRICT+ EAST _INNO_TRANSFER Brasov.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation Harnessing the Digital Economy “Setting the Strategic Context” 9 December 2011 Malcolm Letts.
Research and Innovation (Country note, chapter eight, pp )
15 March 2016 Putting university-industry interaction into perspective: a view from inside South African universities Glenda Kruss IndiaLICS Training Programme.
1 Tanzania National Discourse on Innovation and Innovation Policy 21 st to 22 nd March, 2012, Kunduchi Beach Hotel, Dar es Salaam Tanzania Current Status.
ESRC Regional Knowledge Exchange Event Oisin MacNamara Director, Research, Business and Innovation ESRC Regional Knowledge Exchange Event Oisin MacNamara.
17 March 2016 How do we conceptualise the role of universities and PRIs in a national system of innovation where the goal is inclusive and sustainable.
Balancing Objectives and Needs of Industry and Academia: the Role of Government Presentation by Mary Cryan Meeting of National Councils for S&T Policy.
Seda Annual Performance Plan 2017/18 – 2019/20
Building Business Transformation Capabilities Our perspective on the building blocks, structure and critical success factors to impact change Gillian.
Innovation Development Strategy
Director: Research Coordination, Monitoring and Evaluation
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
IPR’s: new challenges and opportunities
ICT S SMME REVIEW SYMP0SIUM
Stellenbosch University
Columbus state university
Towards a Global, Beyond Boundaries Land Grant
“Working in Partnership and Collaboration to achieve the Goals of NDP and future skills needs” 2019 National Skills Conference, 14 March 2019 Mr.
Working with Industry/External Organisations for Researchers
Business and Industry Partnership Programmes
Yelena Shevchenko Director of Strategic Planning and
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

Strengthening multi-sectoral collaboration: a framework for building interactive capabilities Glenda Kruss HESA Conference 3-4 April 2012

Four research trends and a framework University perspective: scale and forms of interaction that exist in different types of university Firm perspective: nature of firm demand and dynamics in diverse sectors Policy perspective: significance of coordination and alignment across the national system of innovation Institutional perspective: need to balance forms of interaction, and to build interactive capabilities within university => a framework and approach to build interactive capabilities at institutional, sectoral and policy levels

University perspective Scale and forms of interaction with firms: how important is it for universities? Most recent data HSRC 2010: 5 universities representing main types 81% interact, 1 759 academics Of this group 55% interact with firms 58% SMMEs, 56% large firms, 42% MNEs Primarily SET 55%, BUT Business and Commerce 17-18%, Humanities, 15-18% and Education 8% => considerable scale BUT forms ?

Higher education Industry Primarily financial Primarily intellectual Higher education Industry Traditional forms of partnership Sponsorships Donations Commercialisation Consultancies Contracts Incentives Collaboration Networks Entreprenuerial forms Services forms 'Networked' forms

Firm perspective Government incentivisation (THRIP, IF) but recent funding decline, outputs decline Innovative firms: 52% innovate, 15% of these collaborate with local universities; sectoral differences R&D: university as main collaborative partners; sectoral differences => not high general demand for technology or knowledge from universities as collaborative partners => Universities need to have sound understanding of firm demand and dynamics Disaggregate – propensity of firms in specific sectors and knowledge fields

Policy perspective Case studies highlight absence of alignment and coordination across NSI, impacts on outputs, outcomes and benefits of interaction => examine policy environment to highlight key areas of misalignment to determine how conditions facilitate or constrain

Framework: Building interactive capabilities The conceptualization: a broader framework of responsiveness and interaction - teaching, research and outreach activities - a range of external social partners An appreciation and promotion of differentiated university approaches shaped by institutional types, knowledge niches and expertise, institutional historical trajectories and cultures The promotion of a strategic balance of diverse forms of interaction with attendant benefits and risks Development of interactive capabilities on the part of academics, heads of departments, institutional managers and leaders

An understanding of firm demand and the specificities of innovation and R&D dynamics in priority sectors and relevant knowledge fields The promotion of coordination and alignment between universities and other agencies in the national system of innovation, and of alignment with national socio-economic development priorities The promotion of stronger collaboration within the national science and technology system across institutional boundaries of universities and science councils, as a basis for more sustainable interaction

Institutional interactive capabilities Promote debate on responsiveness and interaction in relation to changes in academic roles and identities, and to national priorities Support strategic planning Support sharing of best practice in relation to internal and external interface mechanisms

Commercialisation forms of interaction How can limited expertise to manage IPR be shared in regional technology transfer offices What are the best approaches to the ownership and management of spin off firms How can venture capital be sourced nationally so that spin-off firms are not vulnerable to global markets How can funding be accessed to move from basic research to proof of concept What are the best vehicles to move from proof of concept to proof of product and what partners are required Services forms of interaction What are the interface mechanisms required to offer customized training to firms How can contracts offices manage the negative effects of contract research on publications and students How can heads of department manage and monitor workloads to allow for consultancies without risking core responsibilities Traditional forms of interaction How can institutions attract firm sponsorship and donations, particularly those in rural areas How can institutions build collaborative relationships with industrial bodies, professional associations, SETAs and FET colleges to inform programme and curriculum design in areas of scarce or critical skills What are the interface mechanisms to involve firms more effectively in experiential learning and mentorship Network forms of interaction How can the dynamics of collaborative knowledge creation be managed How can firms be involved in collaborative research networks focused on products with potential benefits for those in rural areas How can research universities collaborate with comprehensive universities and universities of technology to benefit from their applied research and technology development expertise and build research capabilities

Promoting sectoral interactive capabilities Commissioning sectoral studies of skills, R&D and innovation demand; constraints in the NSI in key sectors Extending and deepening support for existing sectoral networks (Biotech, Nano, ICT, Space, Pharma…) Facilitating closer alignment with DTI and DHET strategies in specific sectors Coordinating and deepening collaboration between UoT and research universities in priority sectors for SMMEs Coordinating and facilitating collaboration with professional bodies and industry associations Facilitating regional support for science parks, incubators or centres of excellence

Policy level: promoting coordination and alignment Government DST DHET DTI Agencies NRF Network NACI TIA CHEC ECSEC Gauteng Observatory National Regional Profession Assoc Industry Assoc Networks Sectoral

Thank you! gkruss@hsrc.ac.za