Teacher Evaluation System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Appraisal Systems
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Teacher Evaluation Update Marzano Protocol System.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
ADEPT Framework
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Davis Junior High Action Plan English Department Tier II Indicator: Writing 2010 – 2011.
Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar August 13, 2012 Florida Department of Education.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
New Teacher Induction.
Differentiated Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Models
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
INSTRUCTIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
The New Educator Evaluation System
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Edgewood T-TESS Updates for
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
FY17 Evaluation Overview: Student Performance Rating
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
KSDE Board Presentation Educator Evaluation Systems Update
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Local Option Plan for Analysis of Student Work (ASW)
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
Evaluation Information
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Bradley County Schools Robert Brittingham Department of Instruction Evaluations & Licensure
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation System Updated 8-6-14 Alachua County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System 2014-2015 “An environment for learning, whether learning by students or by adults, does not occur spontaneously, it must be planned and honored in practice” Charlotte Danielson from Teacher Evaluation

Alachua County Teacher Evaluation Process The results of analyzing over 100,000 student achievement scores led to the statistical conclusion that “the most important factor affecting student learning is the teacher.” (Marzano, Classroom Instruction That Works)

Alachua County Teacher Evaluation Process The Alachua County Instructional Improvement System (ACIIS) was developed in compliance with F.S.1006.281 All references to ACIIS refer to the individual modules that comprise the Alachua County Instructional Improvement System.

Alachua County Instructional Improvement System (ACIIS) Teacher Evaluation Module NEW

Alachua County Instructional Improvement System (ACIIS) Teacher Evaluation Module: Domain Summaries There are domain summaries available for the Observations and appraisals.

Component I: Administrator Appraisal Administrative Appraisal consists of the following: Professional Development Plan (PDP) Observations Informal Formal (two observations) Administrator Feedback Formal Administrator Appraisal Annually for all teachers Twice annually for newly hired teachers

Component I: Administrator Appraisal (continued) The Professional Development Plan (PDP): Must be aligned to the teacher’s most recent evaluation results. Objectives, activities and outcomes must be specific and measurable. Timeline: Online PDPs must be completed by Friday, September 26, 2014. (or 30 school days from date of hiring) Teacher Evaluation by Danielson and McGreal

Component I: Administrator Appraisal (continued) ACIIS Appraisal Module – Professional Development Plan FCAT data will not be posted for the 2014-2015 School Year, since the state is transitioning to a new state assessment and set of standards.

Component I: Administrator Appraisal (continued) Observation Feedback Informal Classroom Observations Informal observations are not formally scheduled observations and may occur throughout the school year. Informal observations are a “snapshot” of classroom practices. Feedback from the classroom snapshot will be shared with the teacher through the ACIIS Appraisal Module.

Administrator Appraisal Component I: Administrator Appraisal Observation Feedback ACIIS Classroom Snapshot

Component I: Administrator Appraisal (continued) Observation Feedback Formal Classroom Observations – Protocols Formal Observations will include an initial Online Planning Conference. The Online Planning Conference will occur 10 days prior to the first observation. The ACIIS Appraisal Module Initial Planning Conference process will be used. (An appointment may be scheduled with the administrator upon teacher request.) If the teacher is not using the ACIIS Lesson Plan Module, the teacher will submit the lesson plan online to the appropriate administrator at least 5 days in advance of the scheduled formal observation. Observation time in the classroom will follow the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Component I: Administrator Appraisal (continued) Observation Feedback Formal Observation feedback will occur within 10 days of observation and includes written comments. The ACIIS Appraisal Module Observation template will be used for observational feedback. “Observation is a source of data for use in collecting evidence and for use as a focus for professional discussion and reflection on teaching and learning.” Teacher Evaluation by Danielson and McGreal

ACIIS Formal Classroom Observations

Administrator Appraisal (Component I) Observation Feedback Formal Observation Timeline: Annual Contract Teachers - Observation #1 by October 31, 2014 (or a minimum of 6 weeks from hiring date) Observation #2 by March 31, 2015 PSC Teachers - Observation #1 by January 15, 2015 Observation #2 prior to May 1, 2015 Teachers who received an overall Unsatisfactory on the 2013-2014 evaluation will follow alternate observation dates as listed in the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Evaluator: Teachers will receive the name of their evaluator by the third week of school.

Administrator Appraisal (Component I) Mid-Year Appraisals A Mid-Year Appraisal will occur for all newly hired teachers. The Principal will appraise all newly hired teachers. Mid-Year Appraisals for newly hired teachers will be scheduled by the administrator before the end of the first semester. (subject to change due to hiring date). The Mid-Year Appraisal will use the ACIIS Appraisal Module Annual Appraisal Template for documentation. An Appraisal Conference for any teacher may be scheduled anytime during the school year when appropriate.

Administrator Appraisal (Component I) Annual Formal Appraisal Every teacher will receive an Annual Appraisal by the appropriate administrator. The Annual Appraisal includes a scheduled conference by the appropriate administrator and utilizes the ACIIS Appraisal Module Annual Appraisal form.

Administrator Appraisal (Component I) Annual Appraisal Feedback The Annual Appraisal is aligned to the ACPS performance rubric. The ACPS appraisal performance rubric has five categories: Highly Effective, Effective, Developing, Needs Improvement, and Unsatisfactory. The ACPS appraisal performance rubric is online for teacher access at the “Just 4 Teachers” link on the SBAC homepage.

Administrator Appraisal (Component I) Timeline PSC teachers - Annual Appraisal completed by June 8, 2015. Annual Contract teachers - Annual Appraisal completed by the last day of post-planning, June 8, 2015.

Component II Student Performance Model Florida Statute Requirements All teachers must have a “student data” performance score as a component of their evaluation. The student performance score will be factored in at 40% of the teacher’s summative annual evaluation score when there are less than three years of available student data or 50% of the teacher’s summative annual evaluation score when there are three years of data available.

Student Data Component Teachers who teach students taking the FSA: VAM reading value for the teacher’s students. If the teacher teaches math, VAM math value for the teacher’s students. If the teacher teaches both reading and math, VAM reading and math for the teacher’s students will be used. Teachers who do not teach students taking FCAT K-3: Discovery Education Assessments will be used. Grades 11 & 12: test results from AP, IB, AICE, PERT, ACT. All courses not assessed by state or national assessments: District developed End-of-Course tests will be used. Non-Instructional Teachers: May include a combination of student learning growth data and/or other measurable student outcomes. A separate orientation will occur in September to provide the DOE Technical Assistance information. (see your school administrator for more information)

Teacher Evaluation Categories The teacher’s summative score will determine the teacher category that is reported to the Department of Education. High Performing Effective Needs Improvement (Developing in years 1-3) Unsatisfactory

References The Art and Science of Teaching by Robert Marzano Better Learning Through Structured Teaching by Douglas Fisher and Nancy Frey Classroom Instruction That Works by Marzano, Pickering, and Pollock Teacher Evaluation by Danielson and McGreal

Implementation Plan for Teacher Lesson Plans 2014-2015 The District will follow the same lesson plan procedures that were implemented last year. All teachers are expected to have lesson plans. Lesson plans/PCG are encouraged , but not required, to be done electronically. Principals can ask for lesson plans on a rotating basis by subject areas or grade levels. If a teacher needs assistance in the area of planning or instruction, a principal can ask that the teacher turn in lesson plans more frequently than other teachers. The frequency would be dependent on the degree of assistance the teacher needs. Three areas that are required in the lesson plans are as follows: Benchmarks Essential Questions/Objectives/ Higher Order Questions Gradual Release

Alachua County Instructional Improvement System (ACIIS) Teacher Lesson Plan Module