Elaine Wyllie Executive Director of Joint Commissioning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Health and Wellbeing Board for Leicestershire Cheryl Davenport Programme Director.
Advertisements

Presentation to Lancaster City Council OSC 11 June 2014 Update on the Clinical Strategy for Health Services in Morecambe Bay: Better Care Together.
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
Health Scrutiny in Newham CCG Newham Patient Forum Thursday 4 September Cllr Dianne Walls, Chair, Health and Social Care Scrutiny Commission Luke Byron-Davies,
Health and wellbeing boards and Police and Crime Commissioners.
Creating Better Health and Care Services An overview of a Better Health and Care Review process.
Delivery Plan.  As part of the overarching localism agenda, Councils are responsible for their own improvement.  The Local Account is a key component.
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
St Helens CCG Governing Body Meeting 17 th July 2014 St Helens CCG Engagement Strategy WORKING WELL TOGETHER 2014/2019 Caroline Lees, Head of Corporate.
Northern Lincolnshire Healthy Lives Healthy Futures Programme Consultation Feedback and Review NEL Partnership Board November 2014.
NHS Wakefield CCG NHS North Kirklees CCG Consultation on changes to hospital services in North Kirklees and Wakefield District Wakefield public meeting.
Partnerships for the Future Implementing a sustainable framework of partnership working with service users and other partners Thursday 2 May 2013 Giving.
Welcome to February’s ETAG Su Long, Chief Officer.
Helping to make care better Cynthia Bower, CEO National Care Association Conference 11 November 2009.
Registering the care sector – next steps Dr Linda Hutchinson Director, Care Quality Commission National Care Association Conference, 21 October 2010.
The Leeds Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy Explaining the approach to creating the refreshed Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy for Leeds and.
Engaging with Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs)
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
South Tyneside Neighbourhood Services and Children and Young People Scrutiny Committees – 20 March 2008 Healthcare Commission Standards for Better Health.
March 2012 Social Care Reform Integration – where we are now and where are we going David Behan – Director General Social Care, Local Government and Care.
Annual General Meeting 22 nd September Overview of reports published responses to support findings 1000 comments and reviews of.
Health and Wellbeing VCS Forum
Case for change Burden of disease – each week around 250 diagnoses and 115 deaths in West Yorkshire. Cancer ‘roadmap’ set out in FYFV and Cancer Taskforce.
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Surrey Heath Clinical Commissioning Group
Young Carers and Health
Children and Families Bill SEND provision: how we work together
Successful Integration is a result of good governance – getting the wiring right Integrated care as an aspiration is simple, and simplest if one begins.
Patient and Public Participation
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Uterovaginal Prolapse
Foster Carers: at the heart of a world class children’s workforce
The Health and wellbeing board, local healthwatch, and health scrutiny
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
RAPID RESPONSE program
East Sussex Better Together Alliance
A Blueprint for Change: The West Wales Area Plan
Jai Jayaraman Thursday 27 April 2017
Integrated Care European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations
Have your say!.
Co-commissioning of Primary Care
Mary Adams – Patient and Public Engagement Manager
Consultation on Liverpool’s Hospital-Based Orthopaedic and ENT Services for Adults 26 June to 15 September 2017.
Urgent Care Consultation Update
NICE -The End of Life Care (Service Delivery) Guideline for adults in the last year of life. NICE’s aim is to improve outcomes for people who use the.
Developing an integrated approach to identifying and assessing Carer health and wellbeing ADASS Yorkshire and The Humber Carers Leads Officers Group, 7.
Carers and place-based commissioning
for the Surrey Heartlands CCGs
Public engagement strategy
Strategic Review Update
Gem Complete Health Services
Commissioner Feedback for SLAM CQC Inspection in September 2015
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
HWLH CCG - Who We Are & What We Do
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
Strategy
March 2019 Realising the potential of a single Commissioning Group:
Consultation and Engagement
Karen Owen.
STOCKPORT TOGETHER: CONSULTATION MENTAL HEALTH CARERS GROUP
An Integrated Decision Making Process for Children with Complex Needs
Cheshire East All Age Mental Health Strategy
Tracie Wills Senior Commissioning Officer
Working Together Across Cheshire
Working Together Across Cheshire
The National Data Guardian review & Government response
NHFT Patient & Public Involvement Strategy 2019/2022
National policy perspective
Workbook for Progressing Strategic Priorities at Local Level
Presentation transcript:

Elaine Wyllie Executive Director of Joint Commissioning Developing a new mental health hospital for the Vale of York: Public consultation outcome report Elaine Wyllie Executive Director of Joint Commissioning

Mental health services in the Vale of York The CCG identified mental health services as one of it’s eight strategic initiatives in it’s Integrated Operational Plan 2014 – 2019 Services for people who need mental health support should be in line with best practice We are clear that a clinical model, based on the principles of therapeutic care whilst meeting the needs of what the local community has said it wants, is delivered in an environment that is fit for purpose

What will be in the new hospital? Adult and older people’s inpatient services together under one roof Base for the crisis and intensive home treatment team and the care home liaison team Section 136 assessment suite

What did we ask people? About the proposed number and configuration of beds About the potential sites and preferred location for a new hospital Duty to consult on issues of service change under the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (section 14Z2)

Equality Impact Assessment Due regard to eliminate discrimination, advance equal opportunities and foster good relations between people of diverse groups; characteristics protected by the Equality Act (2010)

Who we engaged with 16 weeks from 23 September 2016 to 16 January 2017: Local population People who use the mental health services Local NHS and independent healthcare organisations Vale of York GP practices and Patient Participation Groups Healthwatch x 3 Health and Overview Scrutiny Committees x 3 Members of Parliament Statutory and voluntary organisations Community groups Students NHS Vale of York CCG and City of York Council

Digital/media campaign Website/on-line survey How we communicated Face to face Stakeholder letters Digital/media campaign Website/on-line survey

How we communicated

Consultation responses 31 public and stakeholder events Multiple opportunities to respond: single IP address 40 email responses Attendance at more than one public meeting: 184 attendees at public events = 166 individuals 387 survey responses

Forecast Bed Requirements Bed numbers (based on PRAMH model) Adult Older people Total TEWV Maximum required 37 26 63 TEWV Minimum required 21 19 40 TEWV average 27 22 49 National benchmarking toolkit (mid point) 29 31 60 Current bed numbers 24 46 70 Proposed bed numbers 30 60

Proposed number of beds

Site Options Feasibility of sites discussed and considered against a set of criteria: Availability Achievability Accessibility Cost Site layout Capacity for service expansion in the future

Proposed sites Haxby Road Clifton Bootham Park Bootham Park Hospital had the most support with 49.32% of respondents (181 people) preferring this option   Haxby Road site was the next most popular with 31.88% of respondents (117 people) preferring this location Clifton Park was the least popular with 18.80% of respondents (69 people) showing a preference for this site Haxby Road Clifton Bootham Park

Those who chose Bootham as preferred option

Those who chose Haxby as preferred option

Those who chose Clifton as preferred option

Next Steps February 2017 - Governing Body consideration of recommendations March 2017 - Development of detailed option appraisal April 2017 - Progression of Business Case (two stage process) January 2018 - Confirmation of final site and detailed design December 2019 - Completion of build Underpinned by NHS England assurance framework for strategic service change

Feedback received Theme (#) Recommendation Detailed action Bed numbers may be appropriate but are dependent on robust, effective community services for all cohorts of the population being in place before further reduction in the bed base is made. (Theme #1) Recommendation 1 The CCG should seek further assurance from TEWV about 24/7 community services provision in the form of a detailed implementation plan to ensure that the proposed bed numbers (60) are sufficient for the population of Vale of York. Future needs and flexibility for the on-going development of services should be a key component of any design and clinical model. (Theme #2 ) Recommendation 2 The CCG should seek further assurance from TEWV on the robustness of the proposed bed numbers in light of the future trend for the demographic changes profiled for the population of the Vale of York. Recommendation 3 TEWV should ensure the organisation of in-patient mental health services reflect current best practice and are developed in a flexible way to meet future models of care. The CCG recognises the need to work with the wider system and partners to maximise effective use of resources. Respondents gave a preference for the location of the new hospital to be on the Bootham Park. (Theme #3) Recommendation 4 TEWV should progress the further detailed site/option appraisals guided by the preference stated by respondents.  If there are constraints by any of the criteria within the detailed site / option appraisal, the remaining options should be progressed in line with preferences in the feedback.

Feedback received Theme (#) Recommendation Detailed action Respondents wanted to understand more about the criteria considered by TEWV in identifying the 3 sites, which were consulted on, and when/how a final decision would be made. (Theme #4) Recommendation 5 TEWV should maintain an open, honest and transparent approach with the public and its partners in the consideration of the detailed site / option appraisals and provide timely updates around any constraints or limitations.   Information and regular updates should be available via TEWV’s website and stakeholder communication channels, such as its newsletter. Recommendation 6 The CCG should remain involved in the on-going consideration of the detailed site/option appraisals within the context of its responsibilities as commissioner of mental health services for the population of the Vale of York. The CCG expects this to be evident through regular updates and discussions. People wanted to remain involved and engaged in the detailed design and plans. Having sight of initial project designs was helpful for people to understand the configuration of beds and how services would actually be delivered. (Theme #5) Recommendation 7 To help ensure that stakeholders have an influence on the way services will be delivered, the CCG requires TEWV to continue to actively involve service users, their carers and partners in designs and plans. A number of issues relating to broader mental health service provision and delivery were highlighted as part of the feedback, which need to be addressed by the relevant partners. (Theme #6) Recommendation 8 To address issues that were highlighted as areas of concern, but were not directly related to the number and configuration of beds or the location of a new mental health hospital, the CCG will share the consultation findings with partners across the system.

Our Goal We want to improve resources for patients and their families and provide care to meet a wide range of needs and circumstances. It matters that with partners, service users and their carers, the best possible solution is created collaboratively. Our goal is to achieve a fundamental improvement in the quality and sustainability of mental health services.