Marshall Public Schools Assessment Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
Summit County’s Changing Demographics Hispanic Population3262,4064,207 Total County Population15,51829,73636,100 Hispanics as percent of.
School Year September 2014 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Diverse Populations in Small Rural Schools Presented by: Amy Trujillo-Conway Amy Trujillo-Conway Madalena Barboa-Archuleta.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
Minnesota Assessment System Overview Jennifer Dugan Director, Statewide Testing 6/18/15 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every.
September 2015 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous Improvement Report for Triton School.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
Testing Overview for Parents October 22, What Tests Will My Child Take? District 11 Testing Chart.
MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.
ESOL Teacher Evaluation and Support Megan Moore Manassas City Public Schools 2016 Title III Consortium Conference.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Quick Look at Minnesota’s Assessment Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Minnesota Assessments June 25, 2012 Presenter: Jennifer Dugan.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
English Learners at MPS January Who are our students? O MPS currently has 398 EL students enrolled K-12 O Current EL students speak 10 different.
Santa Fe Public Schools Our Common Commitments Improving our lives through education.
Minnesota Assessment System Update “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Title I Annual Meeting
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
Nova Classical Academy
An Introduction to NETS*T
Bennett County School District
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Rio Rancho Public Schools
WELCOME.
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
Washington Township Public Schools
TESTING: How We Measure Academic Achievement
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Program Evaluation Leading & Learning Spring 2016
Sheltered Courses for English Learners
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2018 Legislative Session, Act 555 was passed requiring schools.
Annual Title I Meeting Pottsville Schools August 2016
Title I Annual Meeting
6300 Hinkson Road Southwest Little Rock.
Starting Community Conversations
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Taylor ISD Title I Parent Meeting
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Phillipsburg Middle School Identification as a School in Need of  Comprehensive Support and Improvement: Starting Community Conversations March.
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2019 Legislative Session, the Legislature updated a the.
What Every Family Needs to Know! Date
Presentation transcript:

Marshall Public Schools Assessment Update August 2016 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning

Topics Testing and Assessment Overview 2016 Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment Results Math, Reading, Science Achievement Gap Discussion District Response and Direction

Federal Requirements for Minnesota Assessment System Mathematics (MCA III/MTAS) and Reading (MCA III/MTAS) Grades 3-8 and once in high school Aligned to Minnesota Academic Standards Science (MCA III/MTAS) Once in elementary, middle, and high school English Learners (ACCESS/Alternate ACCESS) Grades K-12 Assess English language proficiency in Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking

Changes in Legislation Regarding Testing College Entrance Exam Reimbursement Testing Calendar/Schedule Opt Out Form Use of MCA scores by higher education New Civics Test Writing Test

2016-2017 MCA Testing Schedule & Information Testing window: March 6-May 5 Third year with Pearson as the testing vendor for MCA Reading, Math & Science and OLPA Reading & Math Administration TestNav8 Cloud-based PearsonAccess Next

MPS 2015-2016 Data Results

Marshall MCA III Data- Math & Reading   Math 2015-16 State 15-16 (+/-) Reading Grade 3 65.1% 69.4% -4.3 52.1% 57.3% -5.2 Grade 4 59% 68.7% -9.7 52.3% 58.3% -6 Grade 5 45.1% 58.8% -13.7 66.0% 67.7% -1.7 Grade 6 61.3% 55.9% +5.4 63.4% 62.3% +1.1 Grade 7 59.7% 56.2% +3.5 51.4% 56.6% Grade 8 73.5% 58% +15.5 59.5% 57% +2.5 Grade 10R & 11M 48.2% 47.1% 48.4% 58.9% -10.5 MPS- MCA III 58.7% 59.4% -1.3 55.8% -3.9

2016 MCA III Results Summary Mathematics Grades 3-8 MCA-III Grades 6 (+5.4), 7 (+3.5) and 8 (+15.5) are above the state average. Grade 11 MCA-III Grade 11 was above the state average by +1.1 Overall MPS Math MCA-III scores were below the state average by -1.3 In the MCA III Math proficiency tests, MPS saw a -1.2 decrease in Math MCA-III scores. If we look at MCA III data students enrolled by Oct 1, MPS is above the state average by +.7 I will reference the 4-year trend data document for the next 2 slides.

2016 MCA III Results Summary Reading Grades 6 (+1.1) and 8 (+2.5) are above the state average Overall MPS Reading scores are below the state average by -3.9 In the MCA III Reading proficiency tests, MPS saw a -2.7 decrease in Reading MCA-III scores. If we look at MCA III data students enrolled by Oct 1, MPS is below the state average by -2.6

Other Items of Interest The cohort of students graduating in 2023 (in 5th grade last year) were at 56.8% proficient in math in 2015; this year, they were at 61.3% proficient. That’s a 4.5% increase. The cohort of students graduating in 2022 (in 6th grade last year) were at 52.5% proficient in math in 2015; this year, they were at 59.7% proficient. That’s a 7.2% increase. The cohort of students graduating in 2021 (in 7th grade last year) were at 58.1% proficient in math in 2015; this year, they were at 73.5% proficient. That’s a 15.4% increase. The cohort of students graduating in 2024 (in 4th grade last year) were at 55% proficient in reading in 2015; this year, they were at 66% proficient. That’s a 11% increase. The cohort of students graduating in 2021 (in 7th grade last year) were at 56.3% proficient in reading in 2015; this year, they were at 59.5% proficient. That’s a 3.2% increase.

2016 MCA III Results Summary-Science Grade 5 is above the state average by +3.3 MCA Science 2015-16 State 15-16 (+/-) MS Grade 5 64.8% 61.5% +3.3 MS Grade 8 45.8% 47% -1.2 Secondary Grade 10 51.8% 55.5% -3.7 MPS All Grades 53.9% 54.7% -.8

Sub-Group Results Charts & Summary

Achievement Gap Results Summary-Math Celebrations-Math Our Hispanic subgroup increased proficiency in Math by +7.1 from 2015 Our EL subgroup increased proficiency in Math by +3.7 from 2015 Our Black subgroup increased proficiency in Math by +.4 from 2015 Our FRP subgroup increased proficiency in Math by +.1 from 2015 I will reference the achievement gap data document that has been compiled for MPS.

Achievement Gap Results Summary-Reading Celebrations-Reading Our Black subgroup increased proficiency in Reading by +6.4 from 2015

Achievement Gap Things We Are Doing: Added additional EL staff during the 2015-16 school year. We are currently at 12.42 FTE EL teachers. Added a .5 EL Coordinator for the 2016-17 school year. Offered 3 cohort trainings on Sheltered Instructional Observation Protocol (SIOP) during the 2015-16 school year. Plan to continue to offer additional SIOP trainings during the 2016-17 school year. Doing more parent out each with our EL families. Added 2.0 FTE Parent/Student Connectors. Increased SPED staff to help lower case loads.

Response & Direction Best Practices: Many things are going well. We need to improve on identifying what is working well and then share that information with other grade levels and/or same-grade teachers. Curriculum: We need to ensure that teachers are familiar with state standards and benchmarks and verify that curricular materials selected and used adequately cover those. Data: We need to continue to evaluate data and provide quality, relevant, and timely professional development (relative to what the data shows) for our staff. Evaluation: We need to evaluate existing programs and their effectiveness – specifically, interventions provided for struggling learners.

Response & Direction Professional Development: We need to determine what effective tools, strategies, and professional development are available and provide those to our staff so they can work better with our changing demographics and student population. Professional Learning Communities: It is critical that our PLC’s are effective – to work with colleagues to understand what a standard means, discuss strategies to help identify what works in classrooms, and use data to make instructional decisions. Standards Based Learning: The need for “re-teaching” when students do not understand a particular concept is incorporated into Standards Based Learning, which is likely to help improve student achievement.

MDE Report Card http://rc.education.state.mn.us/ For further data analysis, please visit the MDE report card at the following website: http://rc.education.state.mn.us/