1. Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School 2007-08

2. The Moral Purpose
To support every student at Meadow Homes Elementary School as if he/she were our own child.

3. Session Outcomes
Review the key strategic initiatives that we implemented as a school community last year
Predict our student performance on the CST aligned to our strategic initiatives
Review our actual student performance on the CST linked to our strategic initiatives
Work in grade level teams to follow a similar inquiry process to review our grade level CST data.
Review our AYP, API, and HPSG status

4. The Leadership and Learning Matrix
Lucky
High results, low understanding of implementation components
Replication of success unlikely
Leading
High results, high understanding of implementation components
Replication of success likely
Student Achievement
Losing
Low results, low understanding of implementation components
Learning
Low results, high understanding of implementation components
Replication of mistakes unlikely
Degree and Quality of Implementation
Center for Performance Assessment

5. Our Collective Expectation for Student Achievement
Our staff holds ourselves collectively responsible to ensure that every student within our school achieves academic success by:
Engaging all students in instructional activities that are real world, relevant and standards aligned.
Helping students establish meaningful learning targets where they are able to align their work with exemplary grade level work and then plan to achieve this level of work with teacher and fellow student support.
Providing all students with timely descriptive feedback that supports student achievement in an ongoing manner.
Celebrating student success both formally and informally

6. Specific Strategic Initiatives
Initiative Description
Student Group Focus
Expected CST Performance
TBD

7. Meadow Homes Elementary Demographics – Enrollment Over Time

8. Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance Overall

9. Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Level

10. Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Subgroup

11. Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Subgroup 2

12. Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Grade Level

13. Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Grade Level

14. Meadow Homes Elementary School Footprint ELA:CST 2007- 2008
Advanced
Proficient
5% / 27
15% / 82
350
33% / 188
28% / 155
Basic
Below Basic
Below Basic
# Students Tested: 565
20% / 113
Far Below Basic

15. Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance

16. Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance

17. Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance by Subgroup

18. Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance by Subgroup 2

19. Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance by Grade

20. Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance by Grade

21. Meadow Homes Elementary School Footprint Math: CST 2007- 2008
Advanced
Proficient
8% / 47
24% / 136
350
29% / 163
31% / 172
Basic
Below Basic
Below Basic
# Students Tested: 563
8% / 45
Far Below Basic
8/21/08

22. Meadow Homes Elementary CST 5th Grade Science Performance

23. Meadow Homes Elementary CST 5th Grade Science Performance

24. Meadow Homes Elementary CELDT Performance by Grade

25. Meadow Homes Elementary CELDT Performance by Grade

26. Meadow Homes Elementary CELDT Performance by Grade for Mt
Meadow Homes Elementary CELDT Performance by Grade for Mt. Diablo School District

27. Inquiry Questions What were your goals for students last year?
What strategies did we employ to ensure that all students achieved the standards-aligned achievement targets?
What are your predictions about student performance for your grade level?
Use the tools in the following slides to help you carry out your grade level inquiry.

28. Inquiry Protocol

29. Inquiry Protocol

30. Inquiry Protocol

31. Inquiry Protocol

32. Inquiry Protocol

33. Comparing AYP and API Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP and Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
Academic Performance Index (API)
Performance Levels
Proficient
Not Proficient
Advanced (1000)
Proficient (875)
Basic (700)
Below Basic (500)
Far Below Basic (200)
Calculation
Percentage of students who score proficient or advanced in Math and ELA as defined by each state
Student performance levels for multiple content areas are weighted and used to develop an index score that is measured and compared over two years to show growth

34. HPSG Criteria

35. API Growth for Meadow Homes Elementary

36. Did We Meet our API Growth Targets?
API Group
API Base Score for 2007
API Growth Score for 2008
API Growth Target for 2008
Did we Meet Our API Growth Target for 2008
Overall School
605
636 10
Yes
Hispanic
587
622 11
Economically Disadvantaged
590
624
English Learners
580
607

37. Did we Meet our AYP Targets in 2008
AYP Group
ELA Participation
(95%)
ELA % Proficient or Advanced
(35.2%)
Math Participation
Math Proficient or Advanced
(37%)
Overall School
100%
19.7%
32.8% (SH)
Hispanic
16.0%
31.2%
(SH)
Economically Disadvantaged
17.7%
30.9% (SH)
English Learners
13.6%
28.0%

38. Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School 2007-08