Device Research Conference, June 19, 2012

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEEE Device Research Conference, June , Notre Dame
Advertisements

Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Electron Devices Microelectronics, BSc course Field effect transistors.
Improved Migration-Enhanced Epitaxy for Self-Aligned InGaAs Devices Electronic Materials Conference (EMC), Mark A. Wistey University of California,
Carbon nanotube field effect transistors (CNT-FETs) have displayed exceptional electrical properties superior to the traditional MOSFET. Most of these.
Electrical Techniques MSN506 notes. Electrical characterization Electronic properties of materials are closely related to the structure of the material.
2007 DRC Ultra Low Resistance Ohmic Contacts to InGaAs/InP Uttam Singisetti*, A.M. Crook, E. Lind, J.D. Zimmerman, M. A. Wistey, M.J.W. Rodwell, and A.C.
1 InGaAs/InP DHBTs demonstrating simultaneous f t / f max ~ 460/850 GHz in a refractory emitter process Vibhor Jain, Evan Lobisser, Ashish Baraskar, Brian.
1 Uttam Singisetti*, Man Hoi Wong, Jim Speck, and Umesh Mishra ECE and Materials Departments University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 2011 Device Research.
1 Scalable E-mode N-polar GaN MISFET devices and process with self-aligned source/drain regrowth Uttam Singisetti*, Man Hoi Wong, Sansaptak Dasgupta, Nidhi,
NAMBE 2010 Ashish Baraskar, UCSB 1 In-situ Iridium Refractory Ohmic Contacts to p-InGaAs Ashish Baraskar, Vibhor Jain, Evan Lobisser, Brian Thibeault,
DRC mS/  m In 0.53 Ga 0.47 As MOSFET with 5 nm channel and self-aligned epitaxial raised source/drain Uttam Singisetti*, Mark A. Wistey, Greg.
IPRM 2010 Ashish Baraskar 1 High Doping Effects on in-situ Ohmic Contacts to n-InAs Ashish Baraskar, Vibhor Jain, Uttam Singisetti, Brian Thibeault, Arthur.
Ashish Baraskar 1, Mark A. Wistey 3, Evan Lobisser 1, Vibhor Jain 1, Uttam Singisetti 1, Greg Burek 1, Yong Ju Lee 4, Brian Thibeault 1, Arthur Gossard.
2010 Electronic Materials Conference Ashish Baraskar June 23-25, 2010 – Notre Dame, IN 1 In-situ Ohmic Contacts to p-InGaAs Ashish Baraskar, Vibhor Jain,
Week 8b OUTLINE Using pn-diodes to isolate transistors in an IC
1 InGaAs/InP DHBTs in a planarized, etch-back technology for base contacts Vibhor Jain, Evan Lobisser, Ashish Baraskar, Brian J Thibeault, Mark Rodwell.
1 Interface roughness scattering in ultra-thin GaN channels in N-polar enhancement-mode GaN MISFETs Uttam Singisetti*, Man Hoi Wong, Jim Speck, and Umesh.
1 In 0.53 Ga 0.47 As MOSFETs with 5 nm channel and self-aligned source/drain by MBE regrowth Uttam Singisetti PhD Defense Aug 21, 2009 *
Lecture 19 OUTLINE The MOSFET: Structure and operation
87 GHz Static Frequency Divider in an InP-based Mesa DHBT Technology S. Krishnan, Z. Griffith, M. Urteaga, Y. Wei, D. Scott, M. Dahlstrom, N. Parthasarathy.
280 GHz f T InP DHBT with 1.2  m 2 base-emitter junction area in MBE Regrown-Emitter Technology Yun Wei*, Dennis W. Scott, Yingda Dong, Arthur C. Gossard,
Henok Abebe Collaborators
December 2, 2011Ph.D. Thesis Presentation First principles simulations of nanoelectronic devices Jesse Maassen (Supervisor : Prof. Hong Guo) Department.
Prospects for High-Aspect-Ratio FinFETs in Low-Power Logic Mark Rodwell, Doron Elias University of California, Santa Barbara 3rd Berkeley Symposium on.
2010 IEEE Device Research Conference, June 21-23, Notre Dame, Indiana
Comparison of Ultra-Thin InAs and InGaAs Quantum Wells and
Modeling thermoelectric properties of TI materials: a Landauer approach Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Network for Computational Nanotechnology, Electrical.
University of California Santa Barbara Yingda Dong Molecular Beam Epitaxy of Low Resistance Polycrystalline P-Type GaSb Y. Dong, D. Scott, Y. Wei, A.C.
University of California Santa Barbara Yingda Dong Characterization of Contact Resistivity on InAs/GaSb Interface Y. Dong, D. Scott, A.C. Gossard and M.J.
Comparative Analysis of the RF and Noise Performance of Bulk and Single-Gate Ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs by Numerical Simulation M.Alessandrini, S.Eminente,
III-V MOSFETs: Scaling Laws, Scaling Limits,Fabrication Processes A. D. Carter, G. J. Burek, M. A. Wistey*, B. J. Thibeault, A. Baraskar, U. Singisetti,
Aikaterini Argyraki, Weifang Lu, Paul Michael Petersen, Haiyan Ou
Device Research Conference, 2005 Zach Griffith and Mark Rodwell Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California, Santa Barbara,
12 nm-Gate-Length Ultrathin-Body InGaAs/InAs MOSFETs with 8
2009 Electronic Materials Conference Ashish Baraskar June 24-26, 2009 – University Park, PA 1 High Doping Effects on In-situ and Ex-situ Ohmic Contacts.
Technology Development for InGaAs/InP-channel MOSFETs
Electronic transport properties of nano-scale Si films: an ab initio study Jesse Maassen, Youqi Ke, Ferdows Zahid and Hong Guo Department of Physics, McGill.
STANFORD High-Power High-Speed Photodiode for LIGO II David Jackrel Ph.D. Candidate- Dept. of Materials Science & Eng. Advisor- Dr. James S. Harris March.
Ultrathin InAs-Channel MOSFETs on Si Substrates Cheng-Ying Huang 1, Xinyu Bao 2, Zhiyuan Ye 2, Sanghoon Lee 1, Hanwei Chiang 1, Haoran Li 1, Varistha Chobpattana.
Suppression of Random Dopant-Induced Threshold Voltage Fluctuations in Sub-0.1μm MOSFET’s with Epitaxial and δ-Doped Channels A. Asenov and S. Saini, IEEE.
Improved Regrowth of Self-Aligned Ohmic Contacts for III-V FETs North American Molecular Beam Epitaxy Conference (NAMBE), Mark A. Wistey Now at.
III-V CMOS: Device Design & Process Flows , fax ESSDERC Workshop on Germanium and III-V MOS Technology, Sept.
C. Kadow, J.-U. Bae, M. Dahlstrom, M. Rodwell, A. C. Gossard *University of California, Santa Barbara G. Nagy, J. Bergman, B. Brar, G. Sullivan Rockwell.
Millimeter-wave Device & Circuit Lab. (MDCL) Non-Alloyed Ohmic Contact in HEMTs Microwave devices 노 훈 희  Introduction  Ohmic.
Process Technologies For Sub-100-nm InP HBTs & InGaAs MOSFETs M. A. Wistey*, U. Singisetti, G. J. Burek, B. J. Thibeault, A. Baraskar, E. Lobisser, V.
Indium Phosphide and Related Materials
Uttam Singisetti. , Mark A. Wistey, Greg J. Burek, Ashish K
ISCS 2008 InGaAs MOSFET with self-aligned Source/Drain by MBE regrowth Uttam Singisetti*, Mark A. Wistey, Greg J. Burek, Erdem Arkun, Ashish K. Baraskar,
1 Interstrip resistance in silicon position-sensitive detectors E. Verbitskaya, V. Eremin, N. Safonova* Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute of Russian Academy.
A Self-Aligned Epitaxial Regrowth Process for Sub-100-nm III-V FETs A. D. Carter, G. J. Burek, M. A. Wistey*, B. J. Thibeault, A. Baraskar, U. Singisetti,
Tunnel FETs Peng Wu Mar 30, 2017.
MoS2 RF Transistor Suki Zhang 02/15/17.
Contact Resistance Modeling and Analysis of HEMT Devices S. H. Park, H
Lecture 8 OUTLINE Metal-Semiconductor Contacts (cont’d)
Lower Limits To Specific Contact Resistivity
Metal Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors
Kai Nia, Enxia Zhanga, Ronald D. Schrimpfa,
Device Structure & Simulation
Contact Resistance Modeling in HEMT Devices
High Transconductance Surface Channel In0. 53Ga0
A p-n junction is not a device
Carbon Nanotube Vias By: Rhesa Nathanael.
PHYSICS OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES II
Lecture 8 OUTLINE Metal-Semiconductor Contacts (cont’d)
Optional Reading: Pierret 4; Hu 3
Ultra Low Resistance Ohmic Contacts to InGaAs/InP
Record Extrinsic Transconductance (2. 45 mS/μm at VDS = 0
Lecture #15 OUTLINE Diode analysis and applications continued
C. Kadow1, H.-K. Lin1, M. Dahlstrom1, M. Rodwell1,
Presentation transcript:

Device Research Conference, June 19, 2012 Regrown Ohmic Contacts to InxGa1-xAs Approaching the Quantum Conductivity Limit Jeremy J. M. Law,a,b Andy D . Carter,a Sanghoon Lee,a Arthur C. Gossard,a,b and Mark J. W. Rodwella Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara

Outline Motivation Ballistic FET Current and TLM Quantum Conductance Process Flow Sample Structures Regrowth TLM (RGTLM) Transmission Line Measurement (TLM) Results Metal-semiconductor (TLM) Metal-semiconductor and semiconductor-channel (RGTLM) Theory Comparison Conclusion 2

Unmetalized Source/Drain Source/Drain–Channel Motivation Unmetalized Source/Drain Ungated Channel Metal–Source/Drain Source/Drain–Channel Two interfaces of interest Metal–regrowth interface Regrowth–channel interface Sheet resistance of regrowth Sheet resistance of ungated region Must ascertain contribution to overall access resistance from all of above 3

FET Ballistic Current = TLM Quantum Conductance Fundamental limits to contact resistance to a two-dimensional channel? Quantum limited contact resistance1, 2 equivalent to ballistic transconductance 4 1 P. M. Solomon et al., IEDM Tech. Dig., 1989, p. 405; 2 J Guo et al., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 33, 525 (2012).

Regrowth TLM (RGTLM) Process Flow Understand source (regrowth) to channel interface Rudimentary process flow Approximates FET structure and process flow Independent of high-k properties Four-point Kelvin measurement Epi growth Dummy Pillar Definition Regrowth 5 Planarization Isolation S/D Metalization

TLM Process Flow Understand metal to source (regrowth) interface Rudimentary process flow Can be done on same die as RGTLM Four-point Kelvin measurement Epi growth Regrowth Isolation S/D Metalization 6

Sample Structures: TLM InAs RG on d–doped 25 nm In0.53Ga0.47As channel InAs RG on 100 nm n+ In0.53Ga0.47As channel InAs RG on d–doped 15 nm InAs channel In0.53Ga0.47As → InAs RG on 100 nm n+ In0.53Ga0.47As channel 7

TLM Results InAs RG on d–doped 25 nm In0.53Ga0.47As channel InAs RG on 100 nm n+ In0.53Ga0.47As channel Slope: 23.8 W; Intercept/2: 2.1 W–mm Slope: 7.4 W; Intercept/2: 4.6 W–mm InAs RG on d–doped 15 nm InAs channel In0.53Ga0.47As → InAs RG on 100 nm n+ In0.53Ga0.47As channel Slope: 19.3 W; Intercept/2: 3.0 W–mm Slope: 11.3 W; Intercept/2: 3.0 W–mm 8

Sample Structures: RGTLM InAs RG on d–doped 25 nm In0.53Ga0.47As channel InAs RG on 100 nm n+ In0.53Ga0.47As channel In0.53Ga0.47As → InAs RG on 100 nm n+ In0.53Ga0.47As channel InAs RG on d–doped 15 nm InAs channel 9

Regrowth TLM Results InAs RG on d–doped 25 nm In0.53Ga0.47As channel InAs RG on 100 nm n+ In0.53Ga0.47As channel Slope: 540 W; Intercept/2: 120.8 W–mm Slope: 32 W; Intercept/2: 55.6 W–mm InAs RG on d–doped 15 nm InAs channel In0.53Ga0.47As → InAs RG on 100 nm n+ In0.53Ga0.47As channel Slope: 269 W; Intercept/2: 68.2 W–mm Slope: 15 W; Intercept/2: 12.7 W–mm 10

Results Summary Contact resistance to thin channels (small ns) limited by quantum conductance Low contact resistance of 12.7 W–mm (11.1 W–mm2) Contact resistance low ns channels 136.4 W–mm close to theoretical 80 W–mm N+ Regrowth Composition InAs In0.53Ga0.47As → InAs Thickness 60 nm Doping 5-10×1019 cm-3 Sheet Resistivity 23.8 W 7.4 W 19.3 W 11.3 W Channel In0.53Ga0.47As 25 nm 100 nm 15 nm 9×1012 cm-2 3-5×1019 cm-3 540 W 32 W 269 W 15 W Access Resistivity 120.8 W-mm 55.6 W-mm 68.2 W-mm 12.7 W-mm Metal/Regrowth Contact Resistivity 2.1 W-mm 0.2 W-mm2 4.6 W-mm 1.5 W-mm2 3.0 W-mm 0.4 W-mm2 0.8 W-mm2

Conclusion Ballistic FET current equivalent to quantum conductance of TLM Should not add to FET contact resistance Material independent, i.e. true for all semiconductor materials Metal–regrowth contact resistance is small portion of overall Rc ~ 3.0 W–mm (1.0 W–mm2) Regrown ohmic contacts (136 W–mm) within a factor of 2 of theoretical 80 W–mm 12.7 W–mm (11.1 W–mm2) is true measure of interface properties This includes regrowth to channel and metal to regrowth 12

Backup slides

MBE Regrowth by Migration Enhance Epitaxy (MEE) InAs Quasi MEE In, As, and Si shutters open As shutter open InGaAs Quasi MEE In, Ga, As, and Si shutters open As shutter open 14

MBE Regrowth: Close to 2-D Quantum conductivity Limit: 15