Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process 2016-2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Peninsula School District
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Teacher PDP for the School Year
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Process and Online Tool Updates Kim Simmons NCDPI Robert Sox NCDPI Lou Cicchinelli McREL October 17, 2012.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
North Carolina Principals Council Fall 2012 Kimberly Simmons NCDPI Jennifer Preston NCDPI.
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview Jessica Garner Professional Development Lead Region 6
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Educator Effectiveness System NC Educator Effectiveness System Orientation and Training Southern School of Energy and Sustainability.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Faculty Orientation for Certified Evaluation SY13-14
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Using the Online Evaluation Tool with Fidelity Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Region 2 Professional Development Leads.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Principals and Assistant Principals New to the NCEES Process September 28, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Beaufort County Schools April 19, 2012.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Overview of the Evaluation Process and the School Counselor Evaluation Rubric NCDPI Webinar.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Support Staff Evaluation Process Training Validation Study
Principal Evaluation Process
TEACHER ORIENTATION BEGINNING TEACHERS AND TEACHERS NEW TO SCS
Dissemination Training
Low-Performing Schools Evaluation Requirements
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
NCEES Process: End-of-Year for Teacher Evaluations
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Teacher Evaluation Process
Support Staff Evaluation Process Training Validation Study
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process 2016-2017

MyTalent All evaluation activities will be completed in the MyTalent system: https://cms.truenorthlogic.com Username: CMS email/network login Default Password: Cm$##### (# = last 5 digits of user’s social security number After the initial login, users will be prompted to change the password to one that is easier to remember and more secure.

NCEES? What is NCEES? Which positions follow a NCEES process? NCEES is an acronym for North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Which positions follow a NCEES process? All classroom teachers And these licensed support staff positions: Media coordinators (specialists) Instructional Technology Facilitators School counselors Speech-Language Pathologists School social workers Occupational Therapists School psychologists Physical Therapists Career Development Coordinators/Academy Coordinators Teacher Leadership Specialists (specified dept. positions only)

NCEES Evaluation Process Cycle

Beginning of School Year Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete training on the evaluation process. Online courses for teachers and licensed support staff are available in the Professional Learning module in MyTalent. STEP 1: Training and Orientation Orientation Within two weeks (10 business days) of employee’s first day, the principal/supervisor will provide an orientation to the evaluation process and access to these materials*: Evaluation rubric for the employee’s position Local (Policy GCO) and state teacher/support staff evaluation policy (ID Number: TCP-C-004) Schedule for completing evaluation process CMS minimum performance expectation Resources in Red *Links to orientation materials are available to employees in the Orientation step in MyTalent

Before First Formal Observation Self-Assessment Using the Evaluation Rubric , the employee rates his or her performance and continues to reflect on his or her performance throughout the year. Professional Development Plan Using the self-assessment and/or prior year summary evaluation, professional goals are developed for the current school year. STEP 2: Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference Pre-Observation Conference Before the first formal observation, the evaluator meets with the employee to discuss: self- assessment, professional development plan & a employee-provided written description of the lesson or activity to be observed. Goal: To prepare evaluator for the observation.

Within the First Quarter Component 5: Observations The Observation Rubric is used to record observation feedback. How many observations? Beginning Teachers (< 3 yrs experience) & Experienced Teachers in their 1st year in CMS : 3 formal* by administrator 1 formal* by peer Experienced Teachers with ≥ 3 yrs experience (and not in 1st year with CMS): 3 total (1 must be formal*) on all standards if in license renewal year 2 total (informal) in off-cycle year (unless principal or teacher elects full evaluation plan) on Standards 1 & 4 only Licensed Support Staff (NCEES): There is no abbreviated plan for licensed support staff. 3 formal for beginning staff (< 3 yrs experience; or 1st year in CMS with ≥ 3 yrs) + 1 formal by peer 3 total (1 must be formal) for experienced staff with ≥ 3 yrs experience (and not in 1st year with CMS) EXCEPTION: 1 formal for all speech-language pathologists, physical and occupational therapists (regardless of experience level) *Formal observation = 45 min. or entire lesson/activity Informal observation = 20 min. or entire lesson/activity STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) Component 6: Post-Observation Conference The evaluator conducts a post-observation conference no later than ten school days after each formal observation. Strengths and areas for improvement are discussed as documented on the Evaluation Rubric.

NCEES Rating Scale Distinguished Accomplished Proficient Developing Consistently and significantly exceeded basic competence on standard(s) of performance Accomplished Exceeded basic competence on standard(s) of performance most of the time Proficient Demonstrated basic competence on standards of performance Developing Demonstrated adequate growth toward achieving standards during the period of performance, but did not demonstrate competence on standard(s) of performance Not Demonstrated* Did not demonstrate competence on or adequate growth toward achieving standard(s) of performance. Not Looked For Element not rated during this observation period Not an option in the Summary Evaluation Form Now, think about this in the context of support services staff members. *Note: If the “Not Demonstrated” rating is used, the evaluator must comment about why it was used.

Before the End of the School Year Component 8: Professional Development Plan Evaluator conducts review of PDP goal success for the year. STEP 4: Summary Evaluation and Goal Setting Component 7: Summary Rating Form & Summary Evaluation Conference Every element in Rubric is rated for the year Every standard receives an overall rating for the year Completed Summary Rating Form is reviewed with teacher Based on summary evaluation ratings, the PDP plan type is determined for the following year: Individual Growth Plans-“Proficient” or better Monitored Growth Plans-1 or more “Developing” ratings Directed Growth Plans-“Not Demonstrated” or “Developing” rating for 2 sequential yrs.

Additional Information Employees do not automatically start over at a Developing rating for all elements at the beginning of each year if there is evidence and/or artifacts to support a higher rating. Ratings are determined by the employee’s overall performance compared to the description of the indicators within the elements at the time of the observation. Each observation should reflect a comprehensive review of an employee’s work, not just what was observed at the moment of the observation.

Conferencing Best Practices Employee needs to have time to review evaluation prior to a meeting (suggestion-24 hours) Employee does not have to sign at the time of the post- conference, but must sign within 5 days. Signature represents acknowledgement that the evaluation was discussed with the employee If employee does not agree with the evaluation, s/he can provide a written response and upload supporting artifacts Evaluations should be a collaborative interaction between the supervisor and employee used to improve performance.

Supporting Resources NC Department of Education Evaluation Wikispace: Select the icon for your position type on the home page. These resources can be found there: Evaluation Rubrics and User Guides State Board policy for the evaluation process Talent Management Intranet Site: These and other resources can be found there: Evaluation timelines CMS policies for the evaluation process Minimum performance expectations CMS Indicators for the Teacher Evaluation Rubric