March 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Assessing Your Organization: Gauging Your Land Trusts Progress Maryland Land Conservation Conference 2009 Sylvia Bates, Land Trust Alliance Beki Howey,
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
 To facilitate the implementation of employment equity and the communication to employees of matters relating to employment equity and diversity.
Working Toward Accreditation Joan Ellison, Public Health Director Mary Margaret Stallone, Director Center for Preventive Services Livingston County Department.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
1 PILOT JOINT LEARNING STUDY ON E-GOVERNMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SIMPLIFICATION IN LEBANON André J. Amiouni Senior Policy Analyst Office of the Minister.
Objective institutionspolicies How do social institutions affect the design and implementation of E-Accessibility policies? norms, values and procedures.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
How an idea becomes an IEC standard Gary Johnson Chairman IEC SC45A
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
1 MBA PROJECT Nasir Afghan/Asad Ilyas. 2 Objective To enable MBA students to execute a client focused challenging assignment and to enhance.
Implementing ISO 9001 Our project plan Copyright ©2008 The 9000 Store.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
National Center on Response to Intervention NCRTI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Tessie Rose, PhD NCRTI Co-coordinator of TA and.
Proposed National SET Goals for 2009 National SET Mission Mandate Team and National 4-H Council.
DCIPS Implementation Project Plan Update Army G2 Intelligence Personnel Management Office (IPMO) April 6, 2009.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
How to Conduct National Assessment. Objectives of National Assessment Assessment of each country situation in implementation of the GSIYCF Publishing.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
Preparatory Stakeholder Workshop - Laos 26 May 2010.
M ODULE 6 PART 1: Planning and Stakeholder Management GLOBAL FUND GRANT CONSOLIDATION WORKSHOP DATE.
Healthy School Improvement Plan (HSIP). Plan (using data) Complete Healthy School Rpt Card Develop Healthy School Improvement Plan (HSIP) Plan (using.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
Aviation Security Training Module 3 Conducting an Exercise 1.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
FLORIDA BUREAU OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DROWNING PREVENTION MATCHING GRANT Updates August 2008 Deborah A Mulligan, MD FAAP FACEP Director, Institute.
MONITORING, EVALUATION & REPORTING UPDATES 2014 Annual Partners Forum 15 April 2014.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Accreditation Readiness Team (ART) Orientation Office of Quality Performance.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
District Training Assembly
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Well Trained International
Self-Study Instrument for Early Childhood Centers EDITION
System Planning To Programming
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
GETTING INVOLVED: VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES AT CAEP
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT [SECOND]/[THIRD] QUARTERLY COLLABORATIVE WORKSHOP
March 2017.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Regional preparatory process for Rio+20
Friday – Day 5 Taking it Home!
Version 0.1Assessment Method Overview - 1 Process Assessment Method An objective model-independent method to assess the capability of an organization to.
BSA 376 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
MGT 598 STUDY Education for Service-- mgt598study.com.
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Funding & Resources Gear Meeting 2 presentation
Political Will Gear Meeting 2 presentation Gear Team Members:
Coordination, Goals & Monitoring Gear Meeting 2 presentation
Advocacy Gear Meeting 2 presentation Gear Team Members: March 2018.
Promotion Gear Meeting 2 presentation Gear Team Members: March 2018.
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
Definition of Project and Project Cycle
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
‘BOAT CHART’ PROJECT WORKPLAN
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Development of energy balance statistics
CCM EPA Methodologies, Impact and Shortcomings
European Statistical System Network on Culture (ESSnet Culture)
Overview of the iLIVE Volunteer Project
Understanding Impact Stephanie Seavers, Impact Manager.
needs assessment summary and next steps for continuous improvement
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Validation procedure Nat. Secretariat and MSG
CJA/475 FORECASTING AND STRATEGIC PLANNING The Latest Version // uopcourse.com
CJA/475 CJA/ 475 cja/475 cja/ 475 FORECASTING AND STRATEGIC PLANNING The Latest Version // uopstudy.com
Presentation transcript:

March 2017

BBF Process Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, PhD Katie Doucet Professor of Epidemiology & Public Health, Yale School of Public Health Katie Doucet Research Coordinator, Yale School of Public Health

Timeline & Methodology Summary of Deliverables BBF: Process Implementation Timeline & Methodology Summary of Deliverables

BBF: Implementation Identify local project leader Identify and invite 10-12 committee members Members are responsible for scoring BBF metric Each member participates in no more than three gears Conduct five meetings for baseline assessment process Produce and submit deliverables to Yale University in specified time frame

BBF: Timeline & Methodology MEETING 1: committee orientation to BBFI & scoring; Formation of gear teams & action plans Meeting 1 BBF Index (BBFI) details are presented to committee members Committee members assigned to gear teams Gear teams set data gathering action plans 2 Month Interim Teams collect data, complete primary scoring and document progress

BBF: Timeline & Methodology MEETING 1: committee orientation to BBFI & scoring; Formation of gear teams & action plans MEETING 2: Primary scoring & progress reports Meeting 2 Gear teams present scores to full committee Committee discuss: Scores Progress, incl challenges Gaps identified 1-2 Month Interim: Gear teams finalize scores and reach consensus Gear teams prepare presentation: scoring, data sources, gaps and potential actions Initial report on gaps due to Yale 2 months

BBF: Timeline & Methodology MEETING 1: committee orientation to BBFI & scoring; Formation of gear teams & action plans MEETING 2: Primary scoring & progress reports; Initial report due MEETING 3: Final scoring & gaps identified Technical Report Due Meeting 3 Gear teams present final scores and gaps identified Develop technical report 1 Month Interim: Gear teams develop action plans to address gaps Technical report due to BBF Yale team 1-2 months

BBF: Timeline & Methodology MEETING 1: committee orientation to BBFI & scoring; Formation of gear teams & action plans MEETING 2: Primary scoring & progress reports; Initial report due MEETING 3: Final scoring & gaps identified Technical Report Due MEETING 4: Present and reach consensus on gear action plans Policy Report Due 1 month Meeting 4 Gear teams present finalized action plans Committee reaches consensus on actions Develop policy report 2 Month Interim: Circulate policy report for consensus and submit final to Yale Identify key decision makers Format presentation for key decision makers

BBF: Timeline & Methodology MEETING 1: committee orientation to BBFI, formation of gear teams & action plans MEETING 2: Primary scoring & progress reports; MEETING 3: Final scoring & gaps identified Technical Report Due MEETING 4: Present and reach consensus on gear action plans Policy Report Due MEETING 5: BBFI results; Action plan presented Final Report Due Meeting 5 Committee presents BBFI results, recommendations and proposed action plan to key decision maker Ensure prominent media coverage Clear articulation of “call to action” 2 months 1-2 months 1 month 2 months 1 month

BBF: Summary of Deliverables Minutes from each meeting Due two weeks after each meeting Data action gathering plan Due two weeks after Meeting 1 Initial report of gaps identified Due two weeks after Meeting 2 Technical report: BBF Index scores and documented processes Due two weeks after Meeting 3 Policy Report: recommended actions Due two weeks after Meeting 4 Final report: BBF index scores and documented processes, policy recommendations and action plan Due one month after Meeting 5

BBF: Yale Support $20,000 grant Salary support for coordinator/research/administrator Meeting costs In-country training Professional Development opportunities at Yale for in-country PI(s) July 2017 TAG meeting Conference Presentations & Publications