Assessments for Monitoring and Improving the Quality of Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
Advertisements

Using Student Data as a Basis for Feedback to Teachers Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute Cal-ABA, 2011.
Connecting Teacher Evaluation to Student Academic Progress Implementing Standard 7 0 August 2012.
ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT: BUILDING VALID AND RELIABLE TESTS Habeeb Quadri, M.Ed Denis Jarvinen, Ph.D.
HONG KONG EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSED HKDSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.
By: Michele Leslie B. David MAE-IM WIDE USAGE To identify students who may be eligible to receive special services To monitor student performance from.
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Standard Setting Inclusive Assessment Seminar Marianne.
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Survey Designs EDUC 640- Dr. William M. Bauer
What should be the basis of
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
New York State Education Department Understanding The Process: Science Assessments and the New York State Learning Standards.
Ch 6 Validity of Instrument
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Standardization and Test Development Nisrin Alqatarneh MSc. Occupational therapy.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 Welcome PISA for Development Andreas.
 Closing the loop: Providing test developers with performance level descriptors so standard setters can do their job Amanda A. Wolkowitz Alpine Testing.
Measuring of student subject competencies by SAM: regional experience Elena Kardanova National Research University Higher School of Economics.
Human Learning Asma Marghalani.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning March 2009 Assessment Critiquing.
Management of Quality of Education in Korea
Classroom Diagnostic Tools. Pre-Formative Assessment of Current CDT Knowledge.
Assessment and Testing
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Pike County Middle GA Milestones 2015
B.A. (English Language) UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
AIM: K–8 Science Iris Weiss Eric Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
NAEP Achievement Levels Michael Ward, Chair of COSDAM Susan Loomis, Assistant Director NAGB Christina Peterson, Project Director ACT.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Paulding County School District Elementary Parent Presentation New Georgia Elementary Parent Informational Meeting All parents and guardians.
Curriculum Night Elementary. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
Paulding County School District Hutchens Elementary Parent Presentation Powerpoint information has been adapted from resources available at
Chapter 1 Assessment in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms
The Alignment between Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment in Korea
Curriculum Forum Secondary Tuesday 6 June 2017
EVALUATING EPP-CREATED ASSESSMENTS
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Contents 1. Overview of NAEA NAEA Results 3. Implication.
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS IN QATAR TIMSS
Assessment of Learning 1
Melanie Taylor Horizon Research, Inc.
Next-Generation MCAS: Update and review of standard setting
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Jenny Lyn Tee Estrada-Firman Reporter
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
پرسشنامه کارگاه.
Principles of Assessment & Criteria of good assessment
Understanding and Using Standardized Tests
Using data for instructional decision-making
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Jennifer Rodriguez TB610-60
Deanna L. Morgan The College Board
Presentation transcript:

Assessments for Monitoring and Improving the Quality of Education Kyongah Sang(KICE)

Assessments and Quality of Education Assessment is a systematic process of determining the extent to which instructional objectives are achieved by students It serves as a tool for monitoring and improving student learning and quality of education by… making curriculum priorities more explicit and focusing in instructional effort providing information about current status and progress of students’ achievement and quality of education holding educators accountable for results

Assessment and Quality of Education More and more Countries now conduct assessments to monitor and improve educational quality assessments for monitoring educational quality are often conducted at the national level the percentage of countries conducting at least one national assessments grow rapidly since 2000 the number of countries conducting national assessments was about 100 in 2013(EFA Global Monitoring Report, 2015)

Characteristics of the Assessments for Educational Quality Develop assessment based on curriculum/ standards Interpret assessment results based on performance standards Secure representativeness of examinees Conduct assessment periodically and equate tests to monitor achievement trends Collect educational context or background information

Methods to develop and implement Assessment for Educational Quality Develop test specification which guides the selection of items/tasks Set performance standards/ establishing cut-off scores Define target population & sampling Equate tests administered in different years Questionnaires Survey

Develop test specification which guides the selection of items/tasks Assessment for quality monitoring aims to measure the extent students achieve the intended learning outcomes Curriculum/ standards specify what should be taught and what students should learn Therefore, Assessments for monitoring educational quality are usually curriculum-based tests Test specifications help to ensure that assessments measure a representative sample of instructionally relevant tasks (content validity)

Develop test specification which guides the selection of items/tasks Role of test specification -Test specification guides the selection of test items and assessment tasks -It ensures assessments measure a representative sample of instructionally relevant tasks (content validity) -Select or develop test items according to the test specification ※ In next presentation, methods to develop items from test specification and standards will be discussed in details

Test specification used in NAEA (9th grade, Science, 2013, ) Item Content Behavior Domain Unit Standard memory understand apply … 1 Motion and energy Heat Explain thermal equilibrium, specific heat, thermal capacity ○ 2 Force and Motion Understand how to measure force and Calculate resultant force 3 Matter State of matter Understand solubility is the characteristics of matter 4 Structure of matter Understand matter is composed of elements

Set performance standards Assessment results are reported and interpreted based on fixed performance standards in Assessment for quality monitoring ex) basic, proficient, advance etc. Performance standards specify levels of performance that students are expected to achieve for the performance to be considered partially proficient, proficient, advance, etc. They provide basis for defining the level of performance(set cut-off scores) that is judged to be adequate or exemplary

Set performance standards Generic steps in setting performance standards 1 Select a representative panel 2 Choose a standard-setting method 3 Prepare Performance Level Descriptions 4 Train Participants to use the standard-setting method 5 Compile item ratings or other judgments from participants 6 Provide feedback and facilitate discussion 7 Compile Panelist ratings and obtain final performance standards

Standard setting in NAEA Performance levels are presented in 4 levels (establish 3 cut-off scores) Standard-setting panels - Subject experts who are mostly teachers(20 teachers for each subject) - Teachers from diverse regions - Teachers with experience of teaching target grade students(minimum 2 years) Standard-setting method : Modified Angoff

Standard setting in NAEA Performance Level Descriptions ADVANCED Level PROFICIENT BASIC Superior academic performance of required knowledge and skills Solid academic performance of required knowledge and skills Partial mastery of required knowledge and skills BELOW- BASIC Base Line of basic academic achievement

Test equating Assessments are developed based on same specification every year but there can be little difference in difficulty level It is necessary to equate tests implemented in each year to monitor achievement trends regardless of small changes in test difficulty Test equating refers to the statistical process of determining comparable scores on different forms of an exam(Same construct and the same levels of difficulty and reliability). It allows the scores from each test to be used interchangeably

Test equating in NAEA Equating design Non-equivalent group design using anchor items(external anchor items) Equating Method -Calibration Model for Multiple –Choice items : 3PL Model for Construct Response items : GPC Model -Scale transformation Extended Stocking-Lord Method

Test equating in NAEA Matrix sampling Test design (sample size : 2000 for each test form) Item clusters Test Forms

Define Target Population & Sampling Specify target population - Who should take part in assessment - Who will be excluded - for whom to approve test modification Census test vs. sample-based test - Census test : high-stake, emphasize accountability - Sample-based test : representative sample from pop. needed

Target Population & Sampling in NAEA Target population -All 9th,11th grade students learning National Curriculum (including private schools) Census test except assessments of Social Studies and Science for 9th graders Grades Subjects Contents 9th grade Korean language, Mathematics, English, Science, Social Studies** and Questionnaires All the content covered from the 7th to the 9th grade, 1st semester 11th grade Korean language, Mathematics, English, and Questionnaires All the content covered in the 10th grade

Questionnaires Survey in NAEA Collect context information in which learning takes place Analyze the factors influencing achievement obtain implications to improve learning School Features, School Climate, School Facilities - School-Level Curriculum Management SCHOOLS - Personal Background, Job Satisfaction - Teaching Activities Related to Each Subject TEACHERS* - Personal and Family Background - Extracurricular Activities - Learning Method and Attitude - Learning Experience related to Each Subject STUDENTS