Welcome to the NMTEACH Summative Report Webinar 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Advertisements

Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Teacher Evaluation Update
Schools Module Introduction Press F5 to maximise this presentation.
Guidelines for Claiming Students for Teacher Effect ScoresGuidelines for Claiming Students for Teacher Effect Scores Spring 2014Spring 2014.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
Gradebook Parent Portal. At Ray School, beginning with the second quarter of the school year, parents will have access to a web-based tool that.
Fourth R Inc. 1 WELCOME TO MICROSOFT OFFICE PROJECT 2003 INTERMEDIATE COURSE.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
PowerTeacher with Web Grade Book Semester Classes School Year August 2012.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Syllabus Design and Resources, Part 1
Maximizing RANDA Reports for Directors and Principals Erin Brophy-Lindo Educator Effectiveness Director HR 2015.
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.
Session Objectives Decode the Teacher Summative Evaluation form, including the Student Achievement Measures, so it can be used to give teachers feedback.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Kentucky Department of Education Professional Growth and Effectiveness System PGES Webcast March 18, 2015.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
PowerTeacher Gradebook PTG and PowerTeacher Pro PT Pro A Comparison The following slides will give you an overview of the changes that will occur moving.
CCRPI Title I Parent Involvement PowerSchool Attendance Welcome to Buford Middle School Curriculum & Parent Involvement Night.
EDL 531 Week 1 Individual Code of Ethics Graphic Organizer To purchase this material click below link Week-1-Individual-Code-of-Ethics-Graphic-Organizer.
LEAP 2025 Practice Test Webinar for Teachers
Professional Learning Management System True North Logic
Assignments, Assessments and Grade Book
Please put the title here
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Compass Information System (CIS)
Overview of the NMTEACH Summative Report
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
A Guide for Wisconsin’s Initial Educators By: Cynthia L. Teal
NCEES Process: End-of-Year for Teacher Evaluations
Teacher Evaluation Training
Jessica Dare, Principal Consultant
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Mansfield Elementary School Title I stakeholders’ input & Revision MEETING March 5-9, 2018.
Built by Schools for Schools
Orientation to Revisions in the Colorado State Model Evaluation System
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Poster Template for a 1189mm x 841mm poster presentation
ISIS Degree Application
ISIS Graduation Application
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
1234: AEC SCHOOL | 1234: RESIDING DISTRICT
Please put the title here
David Huckleberry Roosevelt Room April 20th 1:30pm – 2:15pm
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
Maximizing RANDA Reports for Directors and Principals
Program Overview for Arkansas
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Evaluation Information
Your Presentation Name
Staff Finalization Using Thoughtful Classroom
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Evaluation Training September 4, 2018
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the NMTEACH Summative Report Webinar 2015 NMTEACH Year 2 Summative Report (2014-2015) Enhanced information for teachers to better understand performance Provide information that will improve professional development plans (PDPs) Establishes an objective standard of performance in which professionals can improve All the data used in this presentation is “dummy” data

Welcome to the NMTEACH Summative Report Webinar 2015 *50% ONLY when three years of data are available

NMTEACH Summative Report

Identifiers Identifiers include: Teacher Name, Teacher Group according to student achievement data, Level of the teacher’s most recent grade level assignment, New Mexico Teaching License Number, Graduated Considerations Tag, School District and School location. Please refer to the tool box on the NMTEACH webpage for a detailed explanation of Graduated Considerations. School location is assigned according to where the teacher was observed. You can see a copy of your District/Charter plan on the NMTEACH webpage, click on Evaluation Plan.

Overall Score and Effectiveness Level Overall Score = Student Achievement + Observations + Multiple Measures Effectiveness Level is the level corresponding to the range of the Overall Score. Effectiveness levels include: Exemplary, Highly Effective, Effective, Minimally Effective and Ineffective.

Summary of Points This table identifies: Measure- The measures chosen by your district or charter school for NMTEACH EES Teacher Evaluation. To see your district or charter school plan, please visit Evaluation Plans on the NMTEACH website. Possible Points- The maximum number of points available to you in each category, equaling no more than 200 points in total. Possible points in each category will often differ from teacher to teacher, because of Graduated Considerations. Your Points Earned- Actual points you have earned in each category and overall.

Comparison Graph and Comment Box Teacher/District/State Medians: This graph compares your overall score to that of your peers’ median scores in the district and the state. Next Steps: The comment box labeled Next Steps can be used to record notes and goals discussed in the teacher evaluation conference, or the evaluator may choose to fill it out ahead of time. It does not require any mandatory information.

Acknowledgement Signatures The acknowledgement signature lines are provided to document that the summative evaluation report was provided to the teacher. It does not imply agreement , nor waive the right to disagree with the contents of the report.

VAS Scores and Course Listing Detail The table identifies Value Added Scores (VAS) for each course that you taught over the last three years, not including the current year. Information on this table also helps you identify how your Teacher Group (A, B or C) is assigned, and how Graduated Considerations have been applied to your evaluation calculations.

Graphical Representation of Your Impact on Student Growth This is a graphical representation of your individual students’ growth in student achievement. The text below the graph explains the information represented in the graph.

Comparison Graphs for Domains 1 - 4 These graphs illustrate how you scored in Domains 1 – 4 compared to your peers in your school, district, and state.

Graphical Representation of Your Scores for Domains 1 – 4 Your scores from each element of Domains 1 – 4 are graphically represented here. At a glance, you can better understand which areas you need to work on, and the areas in which you excel.

Comparison Graph for Attendance This graph compares your attendance to the attendance of your peers in your school, district and state. Your report will only include attendance data if it was selected as a multiple measure by your district.

Survey Score Detail This table shows the percentage of responses for each question in the survey and how each question is aligned to the elements of the NMTEACH Observation Rubric. Your report will only include survey data if it was selected as a multiple measure by your district.

Glossary! You may want to start here.  This is a quick guide to the terms referenced throughout the summative report.

http://ped.state.nm.us/ped/NMTeach_EvaluationVideos.html

Printing the Summative ● You can print page 1 of the report for all of the teachers at once. ●If you want to print all 5 pages of the NMTEACH Summative Report, you will be required to print the document teacher by teacher. You cannot print the entire report for all teachers at your District or Charter at once. It will impede the entire system.

NMTEACH Office Hours For the next several weeks, the NMTEACH team will have extended office hours District and Charter officials have been provided contact information The office will be open from 7AM through 7PM Monday through Friday, from April 30 through May 8

NMTEACH Summative Report