STUDY VISIT RZESZÒW POLAND APRIL 2013 Michael Schefcsik ISB Munich, Bavaria, Germany.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Formatvorlage des Untertitelmasters durch Klicken bearbeiten Presentation of the Art - Workshop Commenius 2012.

Advertisements

Changes in Accreditation procedures in Slovenia Act Amending the Higher Education Act (ZViS-G) - held on 20 th October 2009.

The German Accreditation System: From programme to institutional approach Accreditation Council Foundation for the Accreditation of Study Programmes in.

ENQA seminar: Programme oriented and institutional oriented approaches to quality assurance - New developments and mixed approaches Berlin, 13/14 June.

© Federal Statistical Office of Germany, Sections Human Resources Development and Questionnaire Pretesting, Data Collection Methods Upward feedback at.

Mapping external quality assurance in Central and Eastern Europe – Where do we go next? CEEN Workshop, Poznan, 28 May 2005 Stefanie Hofmann.

Acknowledging and Honoring Quality Performance.  The purpose of the EAS process is to provide teachers with the opportunity to reflect on professional.

Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan

BA Primary Year 2 School Based Training.. Thank You.

_____. Things to be kept in mind 1.Identify and agree on who, or what the “self” is 2.Self evaluation is a learning process and has to be organised accordingly.

World’s Largest Educational Community

Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski

Irish Universities Quality Board Internal Quality Assurance at Universities: The Irish perspective Dr Padraig Walsh Chief Executive Irish Universities.

Standards for Better Health implementation Suzie Loader Director of Nursing.

24/25 March 2015 Reykjavik “From Gaps to Caps – Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR” TASK D COMPARISON OF EVALUATIONS OF.

Developing appropriate quality assurance: Policies and tools Quality Assurance and Evaluation.

Resource Rooms Resource Room is a special education program for a student with a disability who is registered in either a special class or regular education.

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European

European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Assessment Project Cavendish, M arch 2008 Cavendish, M arch 2008.

Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.

PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.

Rogaška Slatina 30. november- 1. december 2007 ESTABLISHING EXTERNAL QA SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Franci Čuš Marinka Drobnič Košorok.

Development and Evaluation of Joint Study Programmes Almantas Šerpatauskas Center for Quality Assessment in Higher Education.

© Federal Statistical Office Germany, Department B Bringing DESAP self- assessments back into use Mirko Herzner Federal Statistical Office, Germany.

Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Basic Education 4 May 2010 Development of Workbooks.

Report on present status of the quality assurance system at University of Split Željko Dujić, MD, PhD Vice rector for science and international affaires.

Careers Education in Estonian Schools Tiina Trampärk Careers education specialist.

© Mark E. Damon - All Rights Reserved Group 2 Group 3 Round 1Round 2 Final Jeopardy Group 1.

1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD

PG SE JS/CH1.  Introductions  Reflective Portfolio – expectations  Weekly Review meetings  Expectations on School Experience 3  Action planning.

Meeting of the TEMPUS DoQuP Project –Workshop on “Documentation for Quality Assurance of Study Programs" 1-6 May 2012, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Accreditation.

Bishkek 3/5/2011 QA of SPs in Italy 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes National Standards for Quality Assurance.

Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.

Use of CDCynergy Model in Kazakhstan Raimbek Sissemaliev CARK Programme Communication Workhshop, 9-13 August 2004 Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Titelmasterformat Textmasterformate durch Klicken bearbeiten –Zweite Ebene Dritte Ebene –Vierte Ebene »Fünfte Ebene EUWI CIS, Brussels The.

Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.

LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROGRAMMES (LEAPs) Succesfull SEA for local planning.

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.

1 International Conference Performance Appraisal of Civil Servants: Experience of Moldova Tamara Gheorghita Head of Personnel Policy Division, State Chancellery.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.

1 Quality Assurance in VET M. Kirsch & Y. Beernaert Internal Quality Assurance and the self-evaluation report Magda Kirsch & Yves Beernaert Bulgaria –

Lithuanian Education Quality Management: System of School Internal and External Audits Ričardas Ališauskas Head of Education Development Division of the.

Development of Education Quality Management System Ričardas Ališauskas Ministry of Education and Science of Lithuania Rotterdam.

Evaluation of schools 1 Jaako Lindmäe. Evaluation of the Education System 600 pre-school child care institutions 600 general education institutions 43.

Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION QUALITY EXTERNAL MONITORING IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2007 – 2008 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Material produced.

IEP INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM EDUCATOR’S PERSPECTIVE ON EFFECTIVENESS By Kandas Queen.

Review of the Implementation of the White Paper on Corrections in South Africa, 2005.

Belgian Technical Cooperation Internal audit presentation.

“School evaluation as a path towards its development” Rzeszów, r.

Methodology ‘Talent (h)erkend’ November 2013 Kenniscentrum Talentontwikkeling.

Tasks, responsibilities and ethics of the evaluator Helka Kekäläinen Baku.

OStD, Wolfgang Fladerer, Städt. Lion-Feuchtwanger-Gymnasium 1 Democratic Co-Determination Models at Bavarian Gymnasiums Speech by OStD Wolfgang.

The Czech School Inspectorate Main responsibilities and Activities Prague,

Presenter Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, University of the Punjab, Lahore,

Seite 1 Martina Vahlhaus GTZ Evaluation Unit Monitoring & Evaluation Efforts: How do they influence resource allocation? GMF-IFC-GTZ Meeting.

Making best use of EQAVET - the Romanian NRP experience

Katharina Schlamp Germany

DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO

Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty

Faculty of Science Review Staff Orientation Workshop

ECH 514 Innovative Education-- snaptutorial.com

MTE 518 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com

Internal Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Europe

Learning and teaching – lessons 3 School culture 4

Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance

TEEP II – A Pilot Evaluation of Joint Degrees

The role of internal and external evaluation in an autonomous system

Assessment of Classroom Learning

Eve Limbach, Mariann Veisson Department of Public Service

Federal states of Germany: Multitude of educational systems

Presentation transcript:

STUDY VISIT RZESZÒW POLAND APRIL 2013 Michael Schefcsik ISB Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Structure of ISB 7 departments

School System in Bavaria One Evaluation- Concept for all school types

Implementation and legal basis External Evaluation since 2003 Legal basis: BayEUG: Bavarian Law regulating the educational system § 113c... internal and external evaluation are both obligatory (for all state schools) for quality assurance...

Responsibility Quality Agency (QA) concept, conduction, trainig Governmental supervisory board identification of schools, appoint of evaluators, target agreement with schools

Evaluation Team (3 + 1) 3 teachers plus 1 layperson Methods and instruments questionnaire data analysis interview observation Teachers, students, parents, instructors School portfolio, Homepage Heads, teachers, instructors, students, parents, administra- tion, local education authority Lessons, school facilities

Titelmasterformat durch Klicken bearbeiten Textmasterformate durch Klicken bearbeiten –Zweite Ebene Dritte Ebene –Vierte Ebene »Fünfte Ebene weeks before 5 weeks after 3 weeks after Target agreement 6 weeks before 3-4 months after Time line evaluation organisation meeting School portfolio Introductory conference Questionnaire 12 weeks before Report conference Comments of school School visit 3 days

Quality frame work general conditon process quality school process quality lesson results outcome 4 pillars23 criteria

Criteria and requirements 4 quality pillars 23 quality criteria 71 quality requirements assessment 2 are rated2 are described rating indicators

Example: criteria rating 2,50 Criteria rating Requirements (4) Criteria: systematic quality development poor

Final report and consequences Final report is provided to: School, QA, Governmental supervisory board Basis for quality development (school) Basis for target agreement (GSB) Basis for systematic analysis (QA) School has to determine a target agreement with gsb School has to provide progress reports School has to conduct internal evaluations

Thank you for your attention