Paul Eglitis [IEEE] and Siri Jodha S. Khalsa [IEEE]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Clearinghouse, Catalogues, Registries Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey February 5, 2008.
Advertisements

Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 21, 2008.
Standards and Interoperability Forum: Status, Issues & Plans GEO Architecture and Data Committee Kyoto, Japan 9 February 2009 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa.
Managing Interoperability for GEOSS - A Report from the SIF S.J. Khalsa, D. Actur, S. Nativi, S. Browdy, P. Eglitis.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI): status and evolution EC Side Event - GEO Plenary IX Foz do Iguacu, November 2012 Mirko Albani Earth Observation.
Architectures for Data Access Services Practical considerations for design of discoverable, reusable interoperable data sources.
Interoperability Principles in the Global Earth Observations System of Systems (GEOSS) Presented 13 March 2006 at eGY in Boulder, CO by: Eliot Christian,
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Jay Pearlman, IEEE Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, IEEE Report to GEO Committees February 2008.
1 Introduction to XML. XML eXtensible implies that users define tag content Markup implies it is a coded document Language implies it is a metalanguage.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A practical tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey September 2008.
Architectural enhancements for GEOSS Douglas Nebert February 2011.
ADC Meeting ICEO Standards Working Group Steven F. Browdy, Co-Chair ADC Workshop Washington, D.C. September, 2007.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Jay Pearlman, IEEE Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, IEEE Report to GEO Committees February 2008.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Jay Pearlman, IEEE Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, IEEE Report to ADC Committee May 21, 2008.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
ENV proposal meeting, Geneva, Sep. 24, GCI Presentation Joost van Bemmelen, ESA
Towards Data Management Principles (report of progress of the Task Force on Data Management Principles) Alessandro Annoni European Commission Joint Research.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Internal Structure and Standards Steven F. Browdy (IEEE)
W HAT IS I NTEROPERABILITY ? ( AND HOW DO WE MEASURE IT ?) INSPIRE Conference 2011 Edinburgh, UK.
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop November 12-13, Introduction to the SIF Steven F. Browdy, IEEE
® GEOSS AIP 5 Water SBA Update HDWG June 2012 Matt Austin NOAA Stefan Fuest KISTERS Jochen Schmidt NIWA.
1 Using the GEOSS Common Infrastructure in the Air Quality & Health SBA: Wildfire & Smoke Assessment Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working.
OGC ® ® OGC HY_Features model - progress report, next steps - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of.
Data Management Principles Implementation Guidelines Document 10 David Halpern Co-chair of DMP-TF November 11th 2015 Mexico City.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
Task XX-0X Task ID-01 GEO Work Plan Symposium April 2014 Task ID-01 “ Advancing GEOSS Data Sharing Principles” Experiences related to data sharing.
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
Data Services Task Team WGISS-22 meeting Annapolis, the US, September 12th 2006 Shinobu Kawahito, JAXA/RESTEC.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Data Stewardship Interest Group ESA – EO Data Stewardship Maturity Matrix WGISS#41 Meeting, Canberra, (AUS) 14–18 March,
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A Practical Tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey AIP-3 Kickoff March 2010.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
QA4EO in 10 Minutes! A presentation to the 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting.
GCI Overview Steve Browdy with input from Doug Nebert May 2012.
GEO Data Management Principles Implementation : World Data System–Data Seal of Approval (WDS-DSA) Core Certification of Digital Repositories Dr Mustapha.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) The GEOSS Common Infrastructure allows Earth Observations users to search, access and use the data, information, tools.
HMA-T Progress Meeting 26 November 2008 Slide 1 IMAA-CNR activity report HMA-T Progress Meeting 26 November 2008 S. Nativi, E. Boldrini, F. Papeschi IMAA-CNR.
GCI Architecture GEOSS Information System Meeting 20 September 2013, ESA/ESRIN (Frascati, Italy) M.Albani (ESA), D.Nebert (USGS/FGDC), S.Nativi (CNR)
OGC’s role in GEO: Results from the Architectural Implementation Pilot (AIP) George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task IN-05 Coordinator
Page 1 CSISS Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems IIB and GCI Meeting CSR Architecture and Current Registration Status Prof. Liping Di Director.
Common interoperability, best practices and strategic approach
GEOSS Component and Service Registry (CSR)
European Monitoring Platform for Mapping of QoS and QoE
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop
Implementing the Data Management Principles Opportunities and Advantages Robert R. Downs, PhD Sr. Digital Archivist, CIESIN, Columbia University.
DMP GEO Label from self assessment to certification Joan Masó
Implementing through the GCI
Workplan for Updating the As-built Architecture of the 2007 GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Session 7B, 6 June 2007 GEOSS Architecture Implementation.
Brokering Agreement process Stefano Nativi and Mattia Santoro ESSI-lab of CNR-IIA San Petersburg (Russia), 07 Nov 2016.
The GEOSS Data Sharing Principles and Guidelines for Implementation GEOSS Data Providers Side Event St Petersburg – 7th November 2016 Dr. Michel SCHOUPPE.
Overview of GEOSS Data Sharing Principles and Implementation GEO-XIII Plenary Side Event Towards Open Earth Observation Data Policies Wenbo Chu GEO.
The Standards and Interoperability Forum
GEOSS Future Products Workshop Session 5 Introduction & Agenda
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
Geospatial Knowledge Base (GKB) Training Platform
Identifiers Answer Questions
GEOSS EVOLVE Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat CEOS WGISS-43
Wsdl.
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
Data Stewardship Interest Group WGISS-45 Meeting
GEOSS Future Products Workshop March 26-28, 2013 NOAA
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
WGISS Connected Data Assets Oct 24, 2018 Yonsook Enloe
LOD reference architecture
A Case Study for Synergistically Implementing the Management of Open Data Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications.
MSDI training courses feedback MSDIWG10 March 2019 Busan
4/5 May 2009 The Palazzo dei Congressi di Stresa Stresa, Italy
Australian and New Zealand Metadata Working Group
Presentation transcript:

Paul Eglitis [IEEE] and Siri Jodha S. Khalsa [IEEE] Interoperability and Data Access Overview Session 3.2: Interoperability and Standards in relation to the DMPs Paul Eglitis [IEEE] and Siri Jodha S. Khalsa [IEEE] 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

Interoperability and Standards GEOSS Implementation Plan Reference Document: “GEOSS interoperability arrangements are to be based on the view of complex systems as assemblies of components that interoperate primarily by passing structured messages over network communication services. By expressing interface interoperability specifications as standard service definitions, GEOSS system interfaces assure verifiable and scaleable interoperability, whether among components within a complex system or among discrete systems. ” Interoperability is achieved at service interfaces where the interface details are known to all components. GEOSS Interoperability may be achieved with a combination of Technical Standards, Special Arrangements and Best Practices. Technical Standards (i.e. as published by an SDO ) provide a recognized means to establish a well-defined interface. The GEOSS registries document resource information and the interfaces specifications, referencing the applicable Technical Standards or Special Arrangements. Use of brokers and mediators to further facilitate interoperability. Alternative approach is that the tools interrogate service interface and harvest service interface details … but still dependent on a minimum interface definition. Standards Special Arrangements Best Practices 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

Standards in the context of the GCI Registries 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

GEOSS Standards Registry 3: Includes other Registry Functions 2: Provides description, sources, contact details ... 1: An Inventory of GEOSS Standards 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

Best Practices Wiki http://wiki.ieee-earth.org/ Provides an open forum for converging on best practice recommendations and reviews. Reaches out to a broad community. Flexible structure can be easily adapted using lessons learned. Now expanded to include tutorials (more to come) including use of Technical Standards. ... 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

Tools and Facilitators Given the use of Technical Standards and Special Arrangements for interoperability, tools to facilitate are also required. Support Groups, e.g. The SIF Data Dictionaries, Taxonomies – encourage semantic interoperability Software Frameworks, Standards compliant IDEs, Schema and metadata authoring tools, compliance checking tools – make building interoperability easier. The basic building blocks are well established and become simpler as System of Systems concepts have evolved: REST, SOAP to exploit Web Services XML, RDF encode and represent information SPARQL for semantic query ... etc Challenges are still uptake and avoiding different interpretation of the same metadata value. 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum Standards and the DMPs 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

GEOSS Interoperability Worskhop Data Management Principles Category Principle Discoverability DMP-1 Metadata for Discovery Accessibility DMP-2 Online Access Usability DMP-3 Data Encoding DMP-4 Data Documentation DMP-5 Data Traceability DMP-6 Data Quality Control Preservation DMP-7 Data Preservation DMP-8 Data and Metadata Verification Curation DMP-9 Data Review and Reprocessing DMP-10 Persistent and Resolvable Identifiers Table Reference: Data Management Principles Implementation Guidelines, GEO-XII – 11-12 November 2015 Document 10 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Worskhop

Data Management Principles Workshop focus: Metadata, Traceability and Quality Control. The three key Data Management Principles: DMP-1: Data and all associated metadata will be discoverable, through catalogues and search engines, and data access and use conditions, including licenses, will be clearly indicated. DMP-5: Data will include provenance metadata indicating the origin and processing history of raw observations and derived products, to ensure full traceability of the product chain. DMP-6: Data will be quality-controlled and the results of quality control shall be indicated in metadata; data made available in advance of quality control will be flagged in metadata as unchecked. One should note! The same themes are relevant in the context of other DMPs. For example: Traceability is also an aspect of DMP-4. and DMP-10 that cover references to data description in peer- reviewed journals and the use of persistent, resolvable identifiers to ensure precise citation and data provider acknowledgement. Metadata is an element of DMP-4 Data Documentation “via formal structured metadata” Quality control is implicit to DMP-9 on Data Review and Reprocessing Reference: Data Management Principles Implementation Guidelines, GEO-XII – 11-12 November 2015 Document 10 Some examples of the relationship between standards and the DMPs are provided in the next slides. 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

Metadata for Discovery DMP-1 Types of Standard Comments/Examples Data and all associated metadata will be discoverable through catalogues and search engines, and data access and use conditions, including licenses, will be clearly indicated Data connectivity, publication and usage of data Linked Open Data, Standards and BPs; e.g. Linked Data Platform 1.0 Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices: https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ Catalog/Registry Service - standards that support exposure of metadata repositories for e.g. distributed searches OpenSearch OGC Catalogue Service Constraints – provide the control on use and licensing Data Usage Agreements IP issues This is the area of the GEOSS Legal Interoperability Subgroup 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum Traceability DMP-5 Types of Standard Comments/Examples Data will include provenance metadata indicating the origin and processing history of raw observations and derived products, to ensure full traceability of the product chain. Specific detail of metadata standard – the standards shall include provenance records. e.g. Earth Observation Metadata profile of Observations & Measurements OGC 10-157r4 includes: subsetOf (Link to the “father” EO product), linkedWith (Specify a link to another EO product ) Challenges: Tools to exploit this information Organizations to define and use the provenance information in the same way 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum Quality DMP-6 Types of Standard Comments?Examples Data will be quality-controlled and the results of quality control shall be indicated in metadata; data made available in advance of quality control will be flagged in metadata as unchecked. Process standards so that Quality Information is derived consistently ISO 19114:2003 Geographic information -- Quality evaluation procedures Management of quality information ISO/FDIS 19157 Geographic information Data quality - recognises the different viewpoints of the data provider and the consumer Specific Metadata for quality information Typically included in most metadata encoding standards. Not forgetting, QA4EO http://qa4eo.org/ : “Working with experts in the various EO communities to harmonise best practices in their respective areas.” 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

Citation and Acknowledgement Types of Standard Comments/Examples Data description in peer-reviewed journals and the use of persistent, resolvable identifiers to ensure precise citation and data provider acknowledgement. Metadata for the corresponding identifiers ... e.g. Provenance Vocabulary Core Ontology Specification - http://purl.org/net/provenance/ns-20120314 provides classes and properties for describing provenance of Web data. Note: Issues addressed in context of GEOSS DataCore and the development of GEOSS Data-CORE metadata tags placed in the metadata in order to: “(i) allow users to discover and identify the GEOSS Data-CORE data, and (ii) inform the data users of any conditions attached to the use of the data.” 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum References GEO Strategic Plan 2016-2025: Implementing GEOSS // Reference Document http://www.earthobservations.org/documents/GEO_Strategic_Plan_2016_2025_Implementing_GEOSS_Refere nce_Document.pdf GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) Architecture Design Document Version: 1.0, Date: 15 November 2012, Prepared by: IN-03 Task Team Global Earth Observation System of Systems GEOSS, 10-Year Implementation Plan Reference Document, 10-Year Implementation Plan Reference Document GEO 1000R February 2005, https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/10-Year%20Plan%20Reference%20Document.pdf The GEOSS Standards Registry was used to select many of the Standards included in the examples / discussion: http://geoss.omstech.com QA4EO: http://qa4eo.org/ GEOSS Best Practices Wiki: http://wiki.ieee-earth.org/ GEOSS DataCore: https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/dswg/Annex%20IX%20- %20Instructions%20for%20GEOSS%20Data%20Providers%20How%20to%20place%20tags%20in%20the%20Me tadata%20for%20GEOSS%20Data_CORE.pdf W3 OGC Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/ Data Management Principles Implementation Guidelines, GEO-XII – 11-12 November 2015 Document 10 https://www.earthobservations.org/documents/geo_xii/GEO- XII_10_Data%20Management%20Principles%20Implementation%20Guidelines.pdf 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Workshop Standards and Interoperability Forum

Questions / Discussion / Defer to end of Session 3? 2016-OCT-20 GEOSS Interoperability Worskhop