Tuckman’s Group Development Theory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Effective Teams
Advertisements

Situational Leadership Donna Shea, M.Ed.. Objectives By the end of this presentation you should be able to: Discuss the four leadership styles Discuss.
Teams: Bettering the Workplace T ogether E veryone A chieves M ore.
USCG Auxiliary Deck Plate Leadership Series 1 Auxiliary Deck Plate Leadership Series Group Development USCG Leadership Competency: Leading Others: Team.
Introducing 1 Chris Rogers Asst. Scribe. Coaching & Mentoring.
CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG ??? TEAM BUILDING Presented by: Eric Jones.
Copyright © 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning All rights reserved 1 Chapter 15 Dynamics Of Leadership.
TOGETHER EVERYONE ACHIEVES MORE
Communicating in Groups Chapter 10 Providing Leadership in Groups
TEAMWORK.
Teamwork 101.
Section B: Psychology of sport performance 2. Group dynamics of sport performance.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Conservation District Supervisor Accreditation
USCG Auxiliary Deck Plate Leadership Series 1 Auxiliary Deck Plate Leadership Series Group Development USCG Leadership Competency: Leading Others: Team.
 Is there a difference between working as a group and working as a team? Why or why not? What is the difference?
Ms. Eberhard HGD – Spring What is teamwork? A joint action by a group of people, in which each person subordinates his or her individual interests.
Teams Dale W. Bomberger D.ED. ACSW Community Services Group
Introduction of Teams: Team Norming and Culture Jaron L. Jones.
PERSONAL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Effective Teams. CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE TEAMS 
TEAM DEVELOPMENT Prepared by Clay Bassham, Jeanie Long.
COLLABORATION AND PARTNERSHIP MODULE ONE HEALTH COURSE Introduction to Collaboration and Partnership.
COMMUNITY INTERVENTIONS 2 3 rd December Icebreaker: Story Telling 2. Reviewing last week’s topic 3. Course overview 4. How Groups Work 5. Facilitation.
Group Interaction and Group Dynamics. What is a Group? Individuals Group Team.
Leadership & Teamwork. QUALITIES OF A GOOD TEAM Shared Vision Roles and Responsibilities well defined Good Communication Trust, Confidentiality, and Respect.
What Makes a Good Team? Dr Aaron McManus ST2 GP AiT 21st September 2010.
Objective 2.01: Differentiate between positive and negative interpersonal skills in a variety of workplace settings.
Working in Teams, Unit 12 Life Cycle of HIT Teams: Reforming and Repositioning Techniques Component 17/Unit 121 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version.
Team Stages (Forming / norming /storming / performing / adjourning)
USCG Auxiliary Leadership Deck Plate Series 1 Auxiliary Deck Plate Leadership Series Group Development USCG Leadership Competency: Leading Others: Team.
BUSINESS TEAM 7/3/ Basics of Team Building Team Building is the process of collective performance A team comprises two or more people with shared.
The Denison Organizational Culture Model & Link to Performance
Angelike Karampatzaki Career Counselor of the Centre Of Counselling & Career Guidance of Volos.
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
Team Development: Creating a Strong adherent and competent team.
GROUP DISCUSSION REVIEW
Creating Effective Teams
Group dynamics and leaders
ESD Regional Workshop Year 2 Workshop 1
‘There is somebody wiser than any of us, and that is everybody.’
Troop Presentation Scott Wolfe, ASM - Program
TEAMWORK.
Leadership in a humanitarian context
Stages of Team Development
Priorities and system changes
An Introduction to Teamwork
“Together Everyone Achieves More” Shushma Manandhar Pratibha Dhungana
Leadership Compass Michele Rastovich 2016 Prevention Summit
Getting the best out of your team
Team Building and Leadership Standards 8.21 and 8.22
Critical thinking begins when you question beyond what is given.
Action learning Session Two
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Team Building.
Project Development Team
PHED 3 Sport Psychology GROUP FORMATION
4.03 Apply principles of leadership and teamwork
Chapter 3: Set the Example
GROUP COMMUNICATIONS.
Transformational Leadership – Team Yellow
Chapter 9 Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Realities, & Challenges Nelson & Quick, 5th edition Work Teams and Groups.
Chairperson Training.
Quick Quiz What is the meant by the terms social facilitation, social inhibition and evaluation apprehension? What factors can affect how an audience affects.
Personal and social development
Dr Aaron McManus ST2 GP AiT
Teamwork.
TEAMS 2.02.
Teams: Bettering the Workplace
Temple Hills Church of God
Presentation transcript:

Tuckman’s Group Development Theory

Forming High dependence on leader for guidance and direction. Little agreement on team aims other than received from leader. Individual roles and responsibilities are unclear. Leader must be prepared to answer lots of questions about the team's purpose, objectives and external relationships. Processes are often ignored. Members test tolerance of system and leader. Leader directs.

Storming Decisions don't come easily within group. Team members vie for position as they attempt to establish themselves in relation to other team members and the leader, who might receive challenges from team members. Clarity of purpose increases but plenty of uncertainties persist. Cliques and factions form and there may be power struggles. The team needs to be focused on its goals to avoid becoming distracted by relationships and emotional issues. Compromises may be required to enable progress. Leader coaches.

Norming Agreement and consensus largely forms among the team, who respond well to facilitation by leader. Roles and responsibilities are clear and accepted. Big decisions are made by group agreement. Smaller decisions may be delegated to individuals or small teams within group. Commitment and unity is strong. The team may engage in fun and social activities. The team discusses and develops its processes and working style. There is general respect for the leader and some of leadership is more shared by the team. Leader facilitates and enables

Performing The team is more strategically aware; the team knows clearly why it is doing what it is doing. The team has a shared vision and is able to stand on its own feet with no interference or participation from the leader. There is a focus on over-achieving goals, and the team makes most of the decisions against criteria agreed with the leader. The team has a high degree of autonomy. Disagreements occur but now they are resolved within the team positively, and necessary changes to processes and structure are made by the team. The team is able to work towards achieving the goal, and also to attend to relationship, style and process issues along the way. Team members look after each other. The team requires delegated tasks and projects from the leader. The team does not need to be instructed or assisted. Team members might ask for assistance from the leader with personal and interpersonal development. Leader delegates and oversees.

Which stage is your mentor group in now Which stage is your mentor group in now? Which stage will they be in at camp? How can you influence the success of your group according to this model? Forming - stage 1 High dependence on leader for guidance and direction. Little agreement on team aims other than received from leader. Individual roles and responsibilities are unclear. Leader must be prepared to answer lots of questions about the team's purpose, objectives and external relationships. Processes are often ignored. Members test tolerance of system and leader. Leader directs (similar to Situational Leadership® 'Telling' mode). Storming - stage 2 Decisions don't come easily within group. Team members vie for position as they attempt to establish themselves in relation to other team members and the leader, who might receive challenges from team members. Clarity of purpose increases but plenty of uncertainties persist. Cliques and factions form and there may be power struggles. The team needs to be focused on its goals to avoid becoming distracted by relationships and emotional issues. Compromises may be required to enable progress. Leader coaches (similar to Situational Leadership® 'Selling' mode). Norming - stage 3 Agreement and consensus largely forms among the team, who respond well to facilitation by leader. Roles and responsibilities are clear and accepted. Big decisions are made by group agreement. Smaller decisions may be delegated to individuals or small teams within group. Commitment and unity is strong. The team may engage in fun and social activities. The team discusses and develops its processes and working style. There is general respect for the leader and some of leadership is more shared by the team. Leader facilitates and enables (similar to the Situational Leadership® 'Participating' mode). Performing - stage 4 The team is more strategically aware; the team knows clearly why it is doing what it is doing. The team has a shared vision and is able to stand on its own feet with no interference or participation from the leader. There is a focus on over-achieving goals, and the team makes most of the decisions against criteria agreed with the leader. The team has a high degree of autonomy. Disagreements occur but now they are resolved within the team positively, and necessary changes to processes and structure are made by the team. The team is able to work towards achieving the goal, and also to attend to relationship, style and process issues along the way. Team members look after each other. The team requires delegated tasks and projects from the leader. The team does not need to be instructed or assisted. Team members might ask for assistance from the leader with personal and interpersonal development. Leader delegates and oversees (similar to the Situational Leadership® 'Delegating' mode).

So how to we move from one stage to another?

Tell your story Listen to others’ stories Be willing to be honest & uncomfortable Forming Storming

Reframe your perception of others Discern group vision & goals Get to know individual strengths and areas for growth Storming Norming

Use the strengths you know about to act together Partner with others who have different strengths Be willing to say some tough sentences Norming Performing

Some tough sentences. . . . . I realize I can come across as _____________________. I was wrong when I _____________________. If I could do __________________differently, I would. ______________________really helped shape my perspective in a new way. I used to struggle to work with __________________, but now I understand them in a new way. Something I’m learning about myself is _____________________. I’m sorry. Please forgive me.